Unsubscribe request

[archana nagarajan]

Hi

Can you please remove my email from this mailing group? I have sent
multiple requests to the unsubscribe mailing list but still keep getting
the group emails.

Thank you.

Archana

Re: Accuracy Check against v4.1.2 : Status Update

[archana nagarajan]

Hi,

Opening a Document
<https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Writer/Intro/Open_Document>
has
been checked for style and technical accuracy.

Is there a separate status page for links within a main page ?

Regards
Archana

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:22 PM, archana nagarajan <
archananagara...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here's one more page which I have checked for accuracy against v4.1.2.
> Made one change to the technical content.
>
> *Images and OLE objects
> <https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Writer/Intro/Insert>*
>
> Regards
> Archana
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 7:01 PM, archana nagarajan <
> archananagara...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>> Checked for Accuracy template has been added to the documents & I had
>> already signed the status document.
>>
>> Regards
>> Archana
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Keith N. McKenna <
>> keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>> archana nagarajan wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I have verified below section for accuracy against v4.1.2. I made a
>>> > correction to the Rulers section
>>> >
>>> > *Editing text
>>> > <
>>> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Writer/Intro/Content
>>> >*
>>> >
>>> Please add the Checked for Accuracy template to the above document by
>>> inserting the following into the document:
>>> {{Documentation/CheckedAccuracy|}} and also sign the Status document
>>> for that page by adding 4 tildes  next to checked for accuracy by in
>>> the status document.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Keith
>>>
>>> > Regards
>>> > Archana
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: Accuracy Check against v4.1.2 : Status Update

[archana nagarajan]

Hi Keith,

Checked for Accuracy template has been added to the documents & I had
already signed the status document.

Regards
Archana

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net
> wrote:

> archana nagarajan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have verified below section for accuracy against v4.1.2. I made a
> > correction to the Rulers section
> >
> > *Editing text
> > <
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Writer/Intro/Content
> >*
> >
> Please add the Checked for Accuracy template to the above document by
> inserting the following into the document:
> {{Documentation/CheckedAccuracy|}} and also sign the Status document
> for that page by adding 4 tildes  next to checked for accuracy by in
> the status document.
>
> Regards
> Keith
>
> > Regards
> > Archana
> 
>
>

Re: Accuracy Check against v4.1.2 : Status Update

[archana nagarajan]

Hi,

I have reviewed below sections for accuracy against v4.1.2. No changes are
required as far as accuracy is concerned.

*Autocorrect options
<https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/AutoCorrect>*

*Extensions
<https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Extensions>*

And, I corrected a few typos in the section -  Autocorrect options* ( only
corrected spelling mistakes, did not do a proof read )*

Regards
Archana


On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net
> wrote:

> archana nagarajan wrote:
> > Got it Keith. I have added my signature against the sections I checked.
> >
> > Regards
> > Archana
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Keith N. McKenna <
> keith.mcke...@comcast.net
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> archana nagarajan wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I reviewed the sections mentioned below for accuracy against v4.1.2.
> They
> >>> are good and no changes are required.
> >>>
> >>> *Formatting a document
> >>> <https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Formatting>*
> >>> *Find & Replace
> >>> <
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/SearchReplace
> >>> *
> >>>
> >>> (Source :
> >> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Status )
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Archana
> >>>
> >> Archana;
> >>
> >> Would you please sign the Status Document for these two sections by
> >> editing Status Document by typing  next to Checked for Accuracy by
> >> in each of the ones you mention. This will add your electronic signature
> >> and a date and time stamp.
> >>
> >> In future you should do that for all documents that you check, proofread
> >> or author.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Keith
> >>
> >>
> >
> I see that you had. I appreciate it.
>
> Regards
> Keith
>
>

Accuracy Check against v4.1.2 : Status Update

[archana nagarajan]

Hi,

I reviewed the sections mentioned below for accuracy against v4.1.2. They
are good and no changes are required.

*Formatting a document
*
*Find & Replace
*

(Source : https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Status )

Regards
Archana

Re: Accuracy Check against v4.1.2 : Status Update

[archana nagarajan]

Got it Keith. I have added my signature against the sections I checked.

Regards
Archana

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net
> wrote:

> archana nagarajan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I reviewed the sections mentioned below for accuracy against v4.1.2. They
> > are good and no changes are required.
> >
> > *Formatting a document
> > <https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Formatting>*
> > *Find & Replace
> > <https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/SearchReplace
> >*
> >
> > (Source :
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Status )
> >
> > Regards
> > Archana
> >
> Archana;
>
> Would you please sign the Status Document for these two sections by
> editing Status Document by typing  next to Checked for Accuracy by
> in each of the ones you mention. This will add your electronic signature
> and a date and time stamp.
>
> In future you should do that for all documents that you check, proofread
> or author.
>
> Regards
> Keith
>
>

Re: Cwiki account request

[archana nagarajan]

Thanks Keith.

I have created my username on cwiki - it is "archana". Please whitelist it.

Regards
Archana


On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net
> wrote:

> archana nagarajan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can you please create an account on cwiki for me? My username for mwiki
> is
> > archana, and I would prefer the same username for cwiki as well.
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > Regards
> > Archana
> >
> Archana;
>
> The account creation for the cwiki is a bit different than for the
> mwiki. For the cwiki it is a two (2) step process. You create the
> account and then send a request with the username here to have it
> white-listed.
>
> To start the process create your account by going to
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/signup.action and filling out the
> form. Once that is done send a request to this list with the username to
> to request that it be white-listed.
>
> Regards
> Keith
>
>

Re: Can we get this started again?

[archana nagarajan]

Thanks for the details, Keith. I will get started right away.

Regards
Archana

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net
> wrote:

> archana nagarajan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am Archana. I used to work as an Assoc. Operations Manager/Middleware
> > Admin until I quit recently to raise my baby. I would like to work on
> your
> > documentation project. I have completed the orientation module.
> >
> > Please let me know what are the next steps
> >
> > Regards
> > Archana
> >
> >
> >
> Greetings Archana;
>
> The next steps are dependent on where you feel most comfortable. All of
> the Introductory material and the Writer Guide need to be accuracy
> checked against Version 4.1.2 of the OpenOffice software. This entails
> opening AOO 4.1.2 and then following the steps in the wiki page to make
> sure they indeed get the result proper result; eg. if the wiki says
> click file->save as to save a new document, does doing that in v4.1.2
> bring up the Save as Dialog for you to name the document and decide
> where to save it.
>
> If you are more interested in writing than there are numerous pages that
> either need to be written or sections expanded. If this is where your
> interest lies than check the status document and pick one that needs
> doing and start working on it. Just remember to add your signature to
> the Authors line and let the list know what you are going to work on and
> when you start and end.
>
> Lastly there is proof reading and editing a document. This entails
> reading the document for accuracy, and also for use of proper grammar
> and spelling etc. and then making those changes to the document.
>
> All of these roles need to be done for each separate wiki page. Rule of
> thumb is if you Author it someone else needs to proofread and Accuracy
> check it.
>
> The status document at
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Status is where
> we document what has been done and what still needs done for each page
> in the User Guides. Take a look at that and see what you feel
> comfortable attempting and go for it. Just remember to let the list know
> what you are working on and when you finish and to sign the status doc
> by entering 4 tildes next to what you did.
>
> Any questions you have or suggestions on how to make this process easier
> bring them to the list. *All* communication around the documentation
> should take place on this list so that all members of the team are aware
> of what is going on.
>
> Regards
> Keith
>
> 
>
>

Re: Can we get this started again?

[archana nagarajan]

Hi,

I am Archana. I used to work as an Assoc. Operations Manager/Middleware
Admin until I quit recently to raise my baby. I would like to work on your
documentation project. I have completed the orientation module.

Please let me know what are the next steps

Regards
Archana



On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Keith N. McKenna  wrote:

> toki wrote:
> > On 09/12/2015 03:09, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> >
> >> There are ways to document the differences where they exist.
> >
> > This gets into what qualifies as a difference that is significant enough
> > to mention:
>
> Those are editorial decisions that would be have to be made out
> collaboratively.
>
> > # How many people realize that:
> > *  different versions of Java behave differently. Doesn't matter if
> > LibO, AOo, or EU are being used;
> > * there are differences in LibO when using Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, and
> > BSD;
> > # User-installed extensions that alter built-in functionality, as a
> > side-effect of what they are supposed to do;
> >
> > All that said, with the appropriate use of styles --- roughly 40 of them
> > --- one can visually indicate which version of which program on which OS
> > a specific note refers to.
>
> Notes are not the only way that it could be done.
> >
> >> If all you are suggesting is that we just en mass move to LO I am not
> > as sanguine.
> >
> > In theory, ODFAuthors is program agnostic.
> >
> In theory that is correct, however ODFAuthors as it is currently
> constituted does have constraints that would need to be worked out.
> > jonathon
>
> Regards
> Keith
> >
>
>
>