[docbook-apps] Re: DocBook XSL 1.79.0 release is available

[Norman Walsh]

Stefan Seefeld  writes:
>> I'm not sure if this definition of "large open-source project" would fit
>> for a (hypothetical) DocBook organization. However, maybe it would be
>> beneficial to have one as it allows more fine-grained repository
>> permissions? Not sure if that's a good thing for DocBook.
>>
>> Just my thoughts. :))
>
> Yes, I fully agree to the above.

I'm trying to figure it out. Suggestions comments etc most welcome.

Be seeing you,
  norm

-- 
Norman Walsh   | A child becomes an adult when he
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | realizes he has a right not only
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | to be right but also to be
   | wrong.--Thomas Szasz


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [docbook-apps] Re: DocBook XSL 1.79.0 release is available

[Tony Graham]

On Fri, October 16, 2015 6:24 pm, Norman Walsh wrote:
> Stefan Seefeld  writes:
>>> I'm not sure if this definition of "large open-source project" would
>>> fit
>>> for a (hypothetical) DocBook organization. However, maybe it would be
>>> beneficial to have one as it allows more fine-grained repository
>>> permissions? Not sure if that's a good thing for DocBook.
>>>
>>> Just my thoughts. :))
>>
>> Yes, I fully agree to the above.
>
> I'm trying to figure it out. Suggestions comments etc most welcome.

Changing a GitHub user into an organisation is straightforward.  I did it
most recently just yesterday [1].  See
https://help.github.com/articles/converting-a-user-into-an-organization/.

There is no size test for making a GitHub organization.  This most recent
organisation only has one member, me, and I'm not even sure if I should
be.

Regards,


Tony Graham.

[1] https://github.com/Schematron


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org

Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook XSL 1.79.0 release is available

[Thomas Schraitle]

Hi,

On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:25:51 -0400
Stefan Seefeld  wrote:

> [... GitHub ...]
> DocBook as organization 

Stefan, I fear your claim isn't completely right. :) Technically,
DocBook isn't an organisation on GitHub, it's just a normal user named
"DocBook". :)

Shouldn't this be migrated to an organization instead of having a normal
user? According to https://help.github.com/articles/about-organizations/

  About organizations
  Organizations are great for businesses and large open-source projects
  that need multiple owners and administrators, grouped together with
  teams that determine affinity and repository permissions. 

I'm not sure if this definition of "large open-source project" would fit
for a (hypothetical) DocBook organization. However, maybe it would be
beneficial to have one as it allows more fine-grained repository
permissions? Not sure if that's a good thing for DocBook.

Just my thoughts. :))


-- 
Gruß/Regards,
Thomas Schraitle

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org

Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook XSL 1.79.0 release is available

[Thomas Schraitle]

Hi Bob,

On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:33:33 -0700
Bob Stayton  wrote:

> I finally finished putting together a new release of the DocBook XSL 
> stylesheets.  I apologize for the long delay.  Future releases should 
> come more frequently as we move over to Github.

Thanks a lot Bob for this effort! Great work!

One question about contributing:
Any bugs should be reported on GitHub now, right? Will the old bugs on
SourceForge be migrated to GitHub?

How to contribute? Is it ok to send pull-requests or would you prefer
other forms?

Ok, sorry, that was more than one question. ;))

Thanks!

-- 
Gruß/Regards,
Thomas Schraitle

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org

Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook XSL 1.79.0 release is available

[Stefan Seefeld]

On 16.10.2015 02:10, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:25:51 -0400
> Stefan Seefeld  wrote:
>
>> [... GitHub ...]
>> DocBook as organization 
> Stefan, I fear your claim isn't completely right. :) Technically,
> DocBook isn't an organisation on GitHub, it's just a normal user named
> "DocBook". :)

I stand corrected. :-)

>
> Shouldn't this be migrated to an organization instead of having a normal
> user? According to https://help.github.com/articles/about-organizations/
>
>   About organizations
>   Organizations are great for businesses and large open-source projects
>   that need multiple owners and administrators, grouped together with
>   teams that determine affinity and repository permissions. 
>
> I'm not sure if this definition of "large open-source project" would fit
> for a (hypothetical) DocBook organization. However, maybe it would be
> beneficial to have one as it allows more fine-grained repository
> permissions? Not sure if that's a good thing for DocBook.
>
> Just my thoughts. :))

Yes, I fully agree to the above.

Stefan

-- 

  ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org