Re: [docbook-apps] book / info / abstract / footnote not generated into HTML
Michael(tm) Smith writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2007-07-24 21:20 +0200: I do have a tiny DocBook book here, and my problem with it is, that the footnote does not appear in HTML generated by the 1.72.0 stylesheets. MS Can you please go ahead and submit a bug report? Sure, that's the least I can do. MS http://docbook.sourceforge.net/tracker/submit/bug Done. Request ID: 1760907 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1760907group_id=21935atid=373747 MS Just to make sure this doesn't fall between the cracks. Thanks for your support and esp. Dick Hamilton's!!! MS --Mike Jochen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [docbook-apps] book / info / abstract / footnote not generated into HTML
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2007-07-24 21:20 +0200: I do have a tiny DocBook book here, and my problem with it is, that the footnote does not appear in HTML generated by the 1.72.0 stylesheets. I have not looked at this yet nor had a chance to test with your example document, but I think it's possible that footnote in abstract is ignored by design -- the rationale maybe being that the abstract is not always included in output. --Mike smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[docbook-apps] book / info / abstract / footnote not generated into HTML
I do have a tiny DocBook book here, and my problem with it is, that the footnote does not appear in HTML generated by the 1.72.0 stylesheets. I tried poking my installation in order to use 1.73.0 stylesheets, that I actually downloaded and unwrapped, but apparently I wasn't very successfull, as the HTML output still says, it got generated by the 1.72.0 stylesheets. But that's another problem ... It's not really any problem at all for me, that the footnote does not appear, I just thought, I should tell you here about that little irregularity. I edited the text in nxml-mode, so RELAX NG does have it's hands on it and does consider it valid according to my /usr/share/xml/docbook/schema/rng/5.0CR4/docbook.rnc . Maybe it's still invalid DocBook syntax / semantics. Maybe someone is interested in this kind of problem. JH ?xml version=1.0? !DOCTYPE book PUBLIC -//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML 5.0CR4//EN http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/5.0CR4/dtd/docbook.dtd; book xmlns=http://docbook.org/ns/docbook; xmlns:xl=http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink; titleMy DocBook XML test document/title info abstract para paragraph of an abstractfootnoteparafootnote ref. abstract within info/para/footnote /para /abstract /info chapter titlea chapter title/title paraa paragraph/para /chapter /book - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
