Re: elements glossary and phonetic

2004-11-23 Thread Hiroaki KAWAI
  +1.  I'm not sure if the arrow is strictly necessary.  It makes me think 
  more of external link or open in new window rather than glossary. 
But that may just be me.
 
 +1 from me as well.

+1 for glossary
+1 for arrow

-1 for phonetic as I can't view correctly with IE on Windows, because of
lack of phonetic fonts. I think large part of the users don't have 
phonetic fonts in the system. 
# Japansese generally use 'katakana' to show how to pronounce.


---Hiroaki Kawai


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: svn commit: r106229 - /httpd/site/branches/css-test

2004-11-23 Thread Yoshiki Hayashi
Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Author: pquerna
Date: Mon Nov 22 14:55:35 2004
New Revision: 106229

Added:
   httpd/site/branches/css-test/
  - copied from r106228, httpd/site/trunk/
Log:
create a copy of the trunk to test out a CSS based website.
 
 
 FWIW: I'd really like something based on what the docs are built on
 (semantically and syntactically valid xhtml strict, valid CSS and perhaps the
 build system [which is in stage of being rebuilt currently ;-)]).

 ++1, I want that too!

 And I'm ready to help.

 Sweet.

 I decided to start small and try out using CSS instead of the hard coded 
 colors.

++1.  I'm ready to help, too.  I was playing with web site
documentation to start providing translation of those pages
and wondered why we haven't moved to CSS yet.

-- 
Yoshiki Hayashi

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: moving docs build tools to httpd

2004-11-23 Thread Joshua Slive

André Malo wrote:
Currently the docs build tools are misplaced under infrastructure. I'd like to
have them moved from
/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/httpd-docs-build/
to
/httpd/docs-build/trunk (or the like)
What do you think?
+1 (from the guy who misplaced them)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: elements glossary and phonetic

2004-11-23 Thread Andr Malo
* Hiroaki KAWAI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -1 for phonetic as I can't view correctly with IE on Windows, because of
 lack of phonetic fonts. I think large part of the users don't have 
 phonetic fonts in the system. 

I'd guess, a large part of the users don't even have Japanese fonts on their
system ;-).

Seriously: as long as the phonetic elements stay on the glossary page, I
have no problems with them. Funnily on my linux box, firefox and konqueror
have problems with some of the IPA characters, but opera and lynx get them
all (the latter transscribes them very smoothly).

nd

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]