From: Patrik Grip-Jansson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
Added %inlinetags; to default (some docs uses em in default)
Could you reverse that please.
Sure!
The reason I added em was that some docs use this tag for defaults that
are taken from different modules/directives. To allow for such cases, I
propose that we allow directive with in default. That would allow
links to the module where the directive in question is defined, which
looks nice...
I understand why you want this, but I'm not sure if it is a good idea.
Won't it look awfully confusing to have a directive in a directive. I'd
like to keep the default simple and consistent so that the data can easily
be reused.
At the moment, I'm leaning towards saying that we should only allow a simple
default, and that anything more complicated we just leave to be explained
in usage. Anyone have other opinions/suggestions.
Some examples of stuff I would rather not see:
ErrorLog logs/error_log (Unix) ErrorLog logs/error.log (Windows and OS/2)
RLimitNPROC Unset; uses operating system defaults
ProxyTimout emsame as Timeout/em
etc...
In the same veign, I've tride to eliminate all the complicated/multi-line
syntax entries. If a syntax is too complicated to be explained in one
short line, then we need to explain it in usage.
Joshua.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
