Re: [Dorset] Belkin wireless USB
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 17:42 +, Tim Allen wrote: > Hi Peter > > On 19/02/11 18:09, Peter Merchant wrote: > > My ZYxel wireless USB stick has been working at 16% signal strength, and > > my neighbour suggested that I try a Belkin one as he had a good signal > > (albeit on W7). > > > > I borrowed a Belkin F5D7050 which is quite an old one and I get a > > marvelous 42% strength. It dropped right in without any reconfiguration. > > Before buying an old one I wondered if I bought a new one supporting > > 802.11n as well as 'b', whether it would work under Linux. > > > > Does anyone have any experience of 802.11n devices in Linux? > > > > I am using a Draytek 802.11n USB stick, which uses a Realtek RT2870 > radio. Drivers are available on the Realtel Wiki. They required a few > minor hacks (2009) - if your Belkin uses the same radio I can stick my > notes on the Wiki. > > Cheers > > Tim > Dmesg gives: 20.974186] Registered led device: rt2500usb-phy0::radio [ 20.974279] Registered led device: rt2500usb-phy0::quality [ 20.974867] usbcore: registered new interface driver rt2500usb [ 22.084960] usbcore: registered new interface driver rt73usb [ 23.136495] EXT4-fs (sda7): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: errors=remount-ro [ 24.327680] usbcore: registered new interface driver p54usb [ 24.349318] udev[356]: renamed network interface wlan0 to wlan3 and it works as is, obviously, so no extra drivers needed. 'wlan0' was the Zyxel one. As it is a borrowed Belkin, I hope in 28 minutes to have purchased one for myself. Thanks for all the help and advice, Peter -- Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00 Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue
Re: [Dorset] Slight OT: Regular Expressions in Winblows
On Monday, February 21, 2011 09:38:24 pm Keith Edmunds wrote: > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:21:14 +, l...@discoverlinux.co.uk said: > > In vi > > > > :1,$s/_[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]/found/g > > In case it isn't clear, Vim is available on Windows as well. I know Vim > isn't everyone's cup of tea (for some inexplicable reason), but good to > know that there is a powerful editor available for those unfortunate > enough to need to edit files on a Windows platform. > > -- > Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00 > Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ > How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue And of course winviis available on windows too. Andy -- Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00 Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue
Re: [Dorset] Slight OT: Regular Expressions in Winblows
On 21 February 2011 21:38, Keith Edmunds wrote: > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:21:14 +, l...@discoverlinux.co.uk said: > >> In vi >> >> :1,$s/_[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]/found/g > > In case it isn't clear, Vim is available on Windows as well. I know Vim > isn't everyone's cup of tea (for some inexplicable reason), but good to > know that there is a powerful editor available for those unfortunate > enough to need to edit files on a Windows platform. also, you can save a couple more keystrokes if you want to operate on all lines in the buffer: :%s/find/replace/g -- regards, jr. time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. -- Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00 Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue
Re: [Dorset] Slight OT: Regular Expressions in Winblows
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:21:14 +, l...@discoverlinux.co.uk said: > In vi > > :1,$s/_[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]/found/g In case it isn't clear, Vim is available on Windows as well. I know Vim isn't everyone's cup of tea (for some inexplicable reason), but good to know that there is a powerful editor available for those unfortunate enough to need to edit files on a Windows platform. -- Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00 Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue
Re: [Dorset] Slight OT: Regular Expressions in Winblows
On 21/02/11 16:54, Terry Coles wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to search and relace a string of the form '_' (eg _4023) in a
large text file at work today. I'm not skilled in the art of constructing
Regular Expressions, so I went on the web and researched what I needed to
type.
Simple I thought; the expression I want is '_[0-9]{4}'. However, the only
thing I could get to work, using Notepad++ and MS Visual Studio Find tools,
was '_[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]'. Here at home I can get my original expression to
work in Kate, but not in Notepad++ running under wine. So! I thought; this is
a Windows thing. But I can't get it to work in nano either, although '[0-9]
{4}' finds any 4 digits, but '_[0-9]{4}' won't find four digits with a
preceding underscore.
What's the obvious thing I'm missing?
Hi Terry,
nano will work with either when you tick "Match as regular expression"
. I use geany editor (available in Windoz and Linux) and it has a
replace function, Search/Replace and tick "regular expressions".
In vi
:1,$s/_[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]/found/g
John.
--
--
Discover Linux - Open Source Solutions to Business and Schools
http://discoverlinux.co.uk
--
--
Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00
Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue
Re: [Dorset] Slight OT: Regular Expressions in Winblows
On Monday 21 Feb 2011, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> No. Could it be that /[0-9]{4}/ worked because you were telling nano
> you were searching for a regexp with M-R, but when you tried /_[0-9]{4}/
> you forgot to do that? The prompt for the search string says whether
> it's expecting a regexp or not.
Actually, this is weirder than I thought. Originally, I proved the regexp in
Kate andf then copied it from the Kate Find field to the nano Find field. No
matter what I did, I couldn't get a match.
Just now, I put in the regexp that always worked \[0-9]{4}\ into nano and then
copied the underscore char from the nano edit window and pasted it into the
Find field. It worked! Then I deleted the underscore char and typed it
instead. It worked! I then copied and pasted the regexp from Kate agian.
You guessed it. It worked!
I can't understand it, but I guess I'll never find out what I was doing wrong
now.
> Having tried here, I find /_[0-9]{4}/ works fine in nano, only finding
> what I expected. (The // are merely quotes for regexps, not to be
> entered.)
It does for me now ;-)
--
Terry Coles
64 bit computing with Kubuntu Linux
--
Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00
Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue
Re: [Dorset] Slight OT: Regular Expressions in Winblows
Hi Terry,
> However, I still can't see why [0-9]{4} works in nano, but nothing I
> do will allow me to search for 4 digits preceded by an underscore. Is
> underscore a special char in some implementations?
No. Could it be that /[0-9]{4}/ worked because you were telling nano
you were searching for a regexp with M-R, but when you tried /_[0-9]{4}/
you forgot to do that? The prompt for the search string says whether
it's expecting a regexp or not.
Having tried here, I find /_[0-9]{4}/ works fine in nano, only finding
what I expected. (The // are merely quotes for regexps, not to be
entered.)
Cheers,
Ralph.
--
Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00
Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue
Re: [Dorset] Slight OT: Regular Expressions in Winblows
On Monday 21 Feb 2011, jr wrote:
> On 21 February 2011 17:41, Terry Coles wrote:
> > However, I still can't see why [0-9]{4} works in nano, but nothing I do
> > will allow me to search for 4 digits preceded by an underscore. Is
> > underscore a special char in some implementations?
>
> not as far as I know, have you tried escaping the character (ie \_)
Yes. But I thought I might have missed something.
--
Terry Coles
64 bit computing with Kubuntu Linux
--
Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00
Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue
Re: [Dorset] Slight OT: Regular Expressions in Winblows
On 21 February 2011 17:41, Terry Coles wrote:
> However, I still can't see why [0-9]{4} works in nano, but nothing I do will
> allow me to search for 4 digits preceded by an underscore. Is underscore a
> special char in some implementations?
not as far as I know, have you tried escaping the character (ie \_)
--
regards, jr.
time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.
--
Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00
Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue
Re: [Dorset] Belkin wireless USB
Hi Peter On 19/02/11 18:09, Peter Merchant wrote: My ZYxel wireless USB stick has been working at 16% signal strength, and my neighbour suggested that I try a Belkin one as he had a good signal (albeit on W7). I borrowed a Belkin F5D7050 which is quite an old one and I get a marvelous 42% strength. It dropped right in without any reconfiguration. Before buying an old one I wondered if I bought a new one supporting 802.11n as well as 'b', whether it would work under Linux. Does anyone have any experience of 802.11n devices in Linux? I am using a Draytek 802.11n USB stick, which uses a Realtek RT2870 radio. Drivers are available on the Realtel Wiki. They required a few minor hacks (2009) - if your Belkin uses the same radio I can stick my notes on the Wiki. Cheers Tim Regards, peter M. -- Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00 Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue -- Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00 Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue
Re: [Dorset] Slight OT: Regular Expressions in Winblows
On Monday 21 Feb 2011, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> History. Regular expressions were introduced to text processing by Ken
> Thompson who we recently mentioned. The syntax has evolved a bit by
> then and there are variations today. Your regexp could be written as
>
> _[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]
> _[0-9]\{4\}
> _[0-9]{4}
>
> and possibly others once you introduced non-Unix into the mix. And in
> those, the character class [0-9] could be replaced by \d, for digit, in
> some variations.
>
> The first of the six is the oldest; a Basic Regular Expression as POSIX
> calls it. That would work in most places. How do you know which to use
> where? Depends on the program being used.
Thanks for that Ralph.
However, I still can't see why [0-9]{4} works in nano, but nothing I do will
allow me to search for 4 digits preceded by an underscore. Is underscore a
special char in some implementations?
--
Terry Coles
64 bit computing with Kubuntu Linux
--
Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00
Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue
Re: [Dorset] Slight OT: Regular Expressions in Winblows
Hi Terry,
> Simple I thought; the expression I want is '_[0-9]{4}'. However, the
> only thing I could get to work, using Notepad++ and MS Visual Studio
> Find tools, was '_[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]'. Here at home I can get my
> original expression t o work in Kate, but not in Notepad++ running
> under wine. So! I thought; this i s a Windows thing. But I can't get
> it to work in nano either, although '[0-9] {4}' finds any 4 digits,
> but '_[0-9]{4}' won't find four digits with a preceding underscore.
>
> What's the obvious thing I'm missing?
History. Regular expressions were introduced to text processing by Ken
Thompson who we recently mentioned. The syntax has evolved a bit by
then and there are variations today. Your regexp could be written as
_[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]
_[0-9]\{4\}
_[0-9]{4}
and possibly others once you introduced non-Unix into the mix. And in
those, the character class [0-9] could be replaced by \d, for digit, in
some variations.
The first of the six is the oldest; a Basic Regular Expression as POSIX
calls it. That would work in most places. How do you know which to use
where? Depends on the program being used.
Cheers,
Ralph.
--
Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00
Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue
[Dorset] Slight OT: Regular Expressions in Winblows
Hi,
I wanted to search and relace a string of the form '_' (eg _4023) in a
large text file at work today. I'm not skilled in the art of constructing
Regular Expressions, so I went on the web and researched what I needed to
type.
Simple I thought; the expression I want is '_[0-9]{4}'. However, the only
thing I could get to work, using Notepad++ and MS Visual Studio Find tools,
was '_[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]'. Here at home I can get my original expression to
work in Kate, but not in Notepad++ running under wine. So! I thought; this is
a Windows thing. But I can't get it to work in nano either, although '[0-9]
{4}' finds any 4 digits, but '_[0-9]{4}' won't find four digits with a
preceding underscore.
What's the obvious thing I'm missing?
--
Terry Coles
64 bit computing with Kubuntu Linux
--
Next meeting: Blandford Forum, Wednesday 2011-03-02 20:00
Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue
