Re: [Dorset] Thunderbird stacking problem - Re: Syntax for aplay
On 11/11/16 14:01, Terry Coles wrote: On Friday, 11 November 2016 13:57:29 GMT PeterM wrote: On Friday, 11 November 2016 13:47:40 GMT PeterM wrote: Thanks Terry. Glad you've got your bits working. I have been struggling for a week to get my R-Pi to light a couple of LED's and last night discovered one LED is dead. Bah! Exactly. There was me racking my brains to work out why the music wouldn't play, only to find out that there was nothing wrong with what I was doing; it was the music that was faulty ;-) Just spent three days trying to get a Fujitsu Scanner and Windows 10 to talk to each other, failed miserably. Seems like there is some incompatibility between the USB 3 ports on the PC and the USB 2 port on the scanner :( Tim -- Next meeting: Bournemouth, Tuesday, 2016-12-06 20:00 Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk / CHECK IF YOU'RE REPLYING Reporting bugs well: http://goo.gl/4Xue / TO THE LIST OR THE AUTHOR
Re: [Dorset] Thunderbird stacking problem - Re: Syntax for aplay
On 11/11/16 13:51, Terry Coles wrote: On Friday, 11 November 2016 13:47:40 GMT PeterM wrote: On 11/11/16 13:38, Terry Coles wrote: Never mind, I've done it. Usually Thunderbird stacks all responses under the initial email so that they are easy to follow, but on this occasion it has not happened. They are showing up as individual email. I have not changed anything on my setup and it works fine on another list. Not sure if 'stack's is the correct terminology, but it shows them as indented mails under the initiating mail. Is anybody else having this happen to them? The word you are looking for is 'threads' :-) I'm using KMail and threading is working fine. Using Thunderbird here and threading is alright (version 45.4.0) Tim -- Next meeting: Bournemouth, Tuesday, 2016-12-06 20:00 Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk / CHECK IF YOU'RE REPLYING Reporting bugs well: http://goo.gl/4Xue / TO THE LIST OR THE AUTHOR
Re: [Dorset] Thunderbird stacking problem - Re: Syntax for aplay
On 11/11/16 15:11, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi Peter,
Usually Thunderbird stacks all responses under the initial email so
that they are easy to follow, but on this occasion it has not
happened.
It does this using an email's Message-ID header that's then referenced
in later Reference headers. The emails in this thread had those headers
just fine on arrival here.
$ scan -width -forma '%{message-id} %{references}' lp |
> awk '{for (i=1; i<=NF; i++) {if (!($i in s)) s[$i]=++n; $i=s[$i]}} 1'
1
2 1
3 1
4 1 3
5 1 3 4
6 1 4 5
7 1 5 6
8 1 5 6 7
9 1 7 8
10 1 7 8 9
11 1 9 10
$
This shows the sixth message, ordered by date, referenced the
Message-IDs of the first, fourth, and fifth that had already been seen.
From that, you can work out it's almost a linear sequence of replies,
apart from at the beginning, where the second has as yet no reply.
1
├─2
└─3
└─4
└─5
└─6
└─7
└─8
└─9
└─10
└─11
Cheers, Ralph.
It wasn't happening for my emails, but I have discovered a little icon
like two t's one subscripting the other and that puts everything back
into the threads. Obviously I unset it somehow. It was OK on my other
list which was on a different email account. Funny thing that, but all
resolved now.
Cheers all.
Peter
--
Next meeting: Bournemouth, Tuesday, 2016-12-06 20:00
Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
New thread: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk / CHECK IF YOU'RE REPLYING
Reporting bugs well: http://goo.gl/4Xue / TO THE LIST OR THE AUTHOR
Re: [Dorset] Thunderbird stacking problem - Re: Syntax for aplay
Hi Peter,
> Usually Thunderbird stacks all responses under the initial email so
> that they are easy to follow, but on this occasion it has not
> happened.
It does this using an email's Message-ID header that's then referenced
in later Reference headers. The emails in this thread had those headers
just fine on arrival here.
$ scan -width -forma '%{message-id} %{references}' lp |
> awk '{for (i=1; i<=NF; i++) {if (!($i in s)) s[$i]=++n; $i=s[$i]}} 1'
1
2 1
3 1
4 1 3
5 1 3 4
6 1 4 5
7 1 5 6
8 1 5 6 7
9 1 7 8
10 1 7 8 9
11 1 9 10
$
This shows the sixth message, ordered by date, referenced the
Message-IDs of the first, fourth, and fifth that had already been seen.
From that, you can work out it's almost a linear sequence of replies,
apart from at the beginning, where the second has as yet no reply.
1
├─2
└─3
└─4
└─5
└─6
└─7
└─8
└─9
└─10
└─11
Cheers, Ralph.
--
Next meeting: Bournemouth, Tuesday, 2016-12-06 20:00
Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
New thread: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk / CHECK IF YOU'RE REPLYING
Reporting bugs well: http://goo.gl/4Xue / TO THE LIST OR THE AUTHOR
Re: [Dorset] Thunderbird stacking problem - Re: Syntax for aplay
On Friday, 11 November 2016 13:57:29 GMT PeterM wrote: > > On Friday, 11 November 2016 13:47:40 GMT PeterM wrote: > Thanks Terry. Glad you've got your bits working. I have been struggling > for a week to get my R-Pi to light a couple of LED's and last night > discovered one LED is dead. Bah! Exactly. There was me racking my brains to work out why the music wouldn't play, only to find out that there was nothing wrong with what I was doing; it was the music that was faulty ;-) -- Terry Coles -- Next meeting: Bournemouth, Tuesday, 2016-12-06 20:00 Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk / CHECK IF YOU'RE REPLYING Reporting bugs well: http://goo.gl/4Xue / TO THE LIST OR THE AUTHOR
Re: [Dorset] Thunderbird stacking problem - Re: Syntax for aplay
On 11/11/16 13:51, Terry Coles wrote: On Friday, 11 November 2016 13:47:40 GMT PeterM wrote: On 11/11/16 13:38, Terry Coles wrote: Never mind, I've done it. Usually Thunderbird stacks all responses under the initial email so that they are easy to follow, but on this occasion it has not happened. They are showing up as individual email. I have not changed anything on my setup and it works fine on another list. Not sure if 'stack's is the correct terminology, but it shows them as indented mails under the initiating mail. Is anybody else having this happen to them? The word you are looking for is 'threads' :-) I'm using KMail and threading is working fine. Thanks Terry. Glad you've got your bits working. I have been struggling for a week to get my R-Pi to light a couple of LED's and last night discovered one LED is dead. Bah! P. -- Next meeting: Bournemouth, Tuesday, 2016-12-06 20:00 Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk / CHECK IF YOU'RE REPLYING Reporting bugs well: http://goo.gl/4Xue / TO THE LIST OR THE AUTHOR
Re: [Dorset] Thunderbird stacking problem - Re: Syntax for aplay
On Friday, 11 November 2016 13:47:40 GMT PeterM wrote: > On 11/11/16 13:38, Terry Coles wrote: > > Never mind, I've done it. > > Usually Thunderbird stacks all responses under the initial email so > that they are easy to follow, but on this occasion it has not happened. > They are showing up as individual email. I have not changed anything on > my setup and it works fine on another list. Not sure if 'stack's is the > correct terminology, but it shows them as indented mails under the > initiating mail. > > Is anybody else having this happen to them? The word you are looking for is 'threads' :-) I'm using KMail and threading is working fine. -- Terry Coles -- Next meeting: Bournemouth, Tuesday, 2016-12-06 20:00 Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk / CHECK IF YOU'RE REPLYING Reporting bugs well: http://goo.gl/4Xue / TO THE LIST OR THE AUTHOR
[Dorset] Thunderbird stacking problem - Re: Syntax for aplay
On 11/11/16 13:38, Terry Coles wrote: On Friday, 11 November 2016 13:35:27 GMT Terry Coles wrote: Now I am trying to work out how to direct the output of mpg123 to the same audio devices. The format of the command seems to be different to aplay and it keeps defaulting to the PC sound card. Any thoughts on that anyone? Never mind, I've done it. Usually Thunderbird stacks all responses under the initial email so that they are easy to follow, but on this occasion it has not happened. They are showing up as individual email. I have not changed anything on my setup and it works fine on another list. Not sure if 'stack's is the correct terminology, but it shows them as indented mails under the initiating mail. Is anybody else having this happen to them? PM. -- Next meeting: Bournemouth, Tuesday, 2016-12-06 20:00 Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk / CHECK IF YOU'RE REPLYING Reporting bugs well: http://goo.gl/4Xue / TO THE LIST OR THE AUTHOR
