help by recovering a mailbox - maildir and dovecot 2.2.13
Hi, an user screwd up his mailbox in such a way, that I dont see how to get it back in the right order. E.g. in the subcriptions file there is a folder Studienjahr 2014 - 2015.Pitchings in the filesystem there this folder is in trash and without spaces between the years: .Trash.Studienjahr 2014-2015.Pitchings in the Filesystem ther is no folder Studienjahr 2014-2015 Currently he uses our sogo as email client ant there are some folders to showing up but some are empty, some cant be deleted ... So any help and suggestion in recovering this structure is welcome! Regards . Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 E-Mail goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jürgen Walter MdL Staatssekretär im Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: help by recovering a mailbox - maildir and dovecot 2.2.13
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: an user screwd up his mailbox in such a way, that I dont see how to get it back in the right order. E.g. in the subcriptions file there is a folder Studienjahr 2014 - 2015.Pitchings in the filesystem there this folder is in trash and without spaces between the years: .Trash.Studienjahr 2014-2015.Pitchings in the Filesystem ther is no folder Studienjahr 2014-2015 Currently he uses our sogo as email client ant there are some folders to showing up but some are empty, some cant be deleted ... A client does not seem to synchronize subscription and folder operation. I would remove the subcriptions file und let the user subscribe anew. If for instance subcriptions contains a mailbox, which does not exist physically, some versions of Thunderbird shows this mailbox, but as soon as you do something with it, you get a mailbox does not exist error. You can unsubscribe from the mailbox and the ghost mailboxes are gone. - -- Steffen Kaiser -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBVGHVi3z1H7kL/d9rAQL3igf/acBloikzZxTdDtGS0dELadx5of/7Ei5a hOjKn55XpJ7GY2gG0DAsyy4AgY8RPakcHozlPlfHSILke8iqg3gOJ8wYpbwiydXr 24mClQBd+WJMhwTBlFRgsL3/DYIMVZwJeCMPLt7Ho+u5/wjFZtsvj+Mx4j8IU3R6 ppKeYXe5E7wvW2BcJCxBAcpIL7hwQ5OCvkMC387C/5LG/BfRFgbR2yKwlFOpikOn sH3CDcC2iZcqTcO2HWXt7Yu5nRRgklqVTiKzKZwDvfZYsHWWK1Ul7lufcsBPg9s+ EdDQni44H45+0G3P2dhtQsffm7/vYZqoQQ4N94MfpoPlIMOrU1bQPw== =nqOd -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: deliver an email to a large number of local users directly via doveadm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Mahdi Mahdi wrote: Hello,We have a mail service that uses postfix and dovecot. We would like to send an email to a large number of users(about 100K). However, it takes too long to send the email through smtp. Is there any solution to deliver the email locally to all user mailboxes directly.dovecot uses lmtp for transfering local emails. the worst solutoin is that copy the email to all mailboxes via linux file system. But we would prefer to use some tools provided by dovecot like doveadm. is there any way to do this job? if your mail storage is Maildir and you use virtual users with the same uid/gid for all users, the filesystem level is easy going and circumvent Sieve: 1) sent the message to yourself, 2) move the message file somewhere, no user can access, 3) remove delivery headers, 4) rename the file, in order to not contain the :2,... stuff, 5) for u in *; do ln message_file /home/$u/Maildir/new; done The for loop has to be altered to match your local requirements (path, users, ...) though. = Alternativly check out if Dovecot LDA works as expected and use it. - -- Steffen Kaiser -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBVGHXMHz1H7kL/d9rAQKW8gf/Zslvd7JLfiWVtTQYqjoo4gWIY5KVYy3P cxZCRswcFYoCtS0wmzi6kFqfYYZlvOz+Mak9FNM7SqbRNeGDhW9xHaWKc4SxTRE9 Rq8BGCltBNSgW/O4KPImF4S6jvlhVp433oOL70Q9zK7Pk5KOpA47YsHdosSwaZ+6 +buRPIoKOB/ktU4pnsCSrnGNuFw7EgME+pAJy98qjjJ2XKejZ0/fKxma4eaxxj5J rfI71Gs4o3VIpJMdcYH3uBGkkn4/qCI4AqaHiZwnjoE7PwB8oipFbnQUdoHjFoMZ eqsg/92eby97/w2+PwiR0mnQbU5H4Zt5Fx9cp7okeSWMBGRNb2dDUA== =CFTS -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Virtual User Authentication
I have only virtual users on the system that I maintain. I am using Postfix which is configured to use Devecot for authentication. I get several attempts everyday to hack into the system, both via Postfix and directly via Dovecot. The following is from the dovecot log: Nov 11 04:14:48 auth-worker(21005): Error: pam(monica,69.193.88.146): pam_authenticate() failed: authentication error (/etc/pam.d/dovecot missing?) Now, I do not use pam on this system. Is there a way I can eliminate Dovecot from trying to use it? -- Jerry pgpMBvuw7c8bs.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Virtual User Authentication
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Jerry wrote: Nov 11 04:14:48 auth-worker(21005): Error: pam(monica,69.193.88.146): pam_authenticate() failed: authentication error (/etc/pam.d/dovecot missing?) Now, I do not use pam on this system. Is there a way I can eliminate Dovecot from trying to use it? post your doveconf -n - -- Steffen Kaiser -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBVGINdnz1H7kL/d9rAQIMRAf/Z6P6J0HLfhivcaEg6Y1RJI8s6TW735L7 5tRHv+XDNuwGVfMa0yge8XnTII4GoMeXkP99DJIOULF3lPfZ9sd2mr8JZmVjINQQ togbwmoPkvEQ3b1SnNYNWXOwA35+Z4UeLgNIGxkZ+PJwbuoi4dZVl0QiQB0S8b1G t32Z1bR2Hml/5r7S8rN9mZI2EpYPUhkG6cTxNK/zZw90NW0AtJ+RoKz8Mo+GhMff NdVgGT9YD7m+79XE6WUwm2KFGBcmd6K4LFWBn5XorEI5YrPoktCUp1c+StM0TJNE PRv8ATWN2zUPRIxrRtqRp7WCsEGQLRWxfW7sE+zrU5MggPXSKE2m4Q== =JnBO -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Virtual User Authentication
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:21:58 +0100 (CET), Steffen Kaiser stated: On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Jerry wrote: Nov 11 04:14:48 auth-worker(21005): Error: pam(monica,69.193.88.146): pam_authenticate() failed: authentication error (/etc/pam.d/dovecot missing?) Now, I do not use pam on this system. Is there a way I can eliminate Dovecot from trying to use it? post your doveconf -n $ dovecot -n # 2.2.15: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p12 amd64 ufs auth_mechanisms = plain login cram-md5 digest-md5 lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes log_path = /var/log/dovecot mail_location = maildir:/var/mail/vmail/%d/gerard managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date ihave duplicate namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox Sent Messages { special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { special_use = \Trash } prefix = } passdb { args = username_format=%u /usr/local/etc/dovecot/user/passwd driver = passwd-file } passdb { args = scheme=CRYPT username_format=%u /usr/local/etc/dovecot/user/passwd driver = passwd-file } passdb { driver = pam } passdb { args = scheme=CRYPT username_format=%u /usr/local/etc/dovecot/user/passwd driver = passwd-file } plugin { sieve_global_dir = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/sieve/ sieve_global_path = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/sieve/default.sieve } postmaster_address = postmas...@seibercom.net service auth { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth { group = postfix mode = 0666 user = postfix } unix_listener auth-userdb { group = vmail mode = 0666 user = vmail } } service imap-login { inet_listener imap { port = 143 } inet_listener imaps { port = 993 ssl = yes } } service pop3-login { inet_listener pop3 { port = 110 } inet_listener pop3s { port = 995 ssl = yes } } ssl_cert = /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key = /etc/ssl/private/dovecot.pem ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 userdb { args = username_format=%u /usr/local/etc/dovecot/user/passwd default_fields = uid=vmail gid=vmail driver = passwd-file } userdb { driver = passwd } userdb { args = username_format=%u /usr/local/etc/dovecot/user/passwd driver = passwd-file } version_ignore = yes protocol lda { mail_plugins = sieve sieve } -- Jerry pgp_4x4DGvfG2.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Virtual User Authentication
Am 11.11.2014 um 15:41 schrieb Jerry: On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:21:58 +0100 (CET), Steffen Kaiser stated: On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Jerry wrote: Nov 11 04:14:48 auth-worker(21005): Error: pam(monica,69.193.88.146): pam_authenticate() failed: authentication error (/etc/pam.d/dovecot missing?) Now, I do not use pam on this system. Is there a way I can eliminate Dovecot from trying to use it? post your doveconf -n passdb { driver = pam } well, did you read the output? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Virtual User Authentication
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:44:31 +0100, Reindl Harald stated: Am 11.11.2014 um 15:41 schrieb Jerry: On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:21:58 +0100 (CET), Steffen Kaiser stated: On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Jerry wrote: Nov 11 04:14:48 auth-worker(21005): Error: pam(monica,69.193.88.146): pam_authenticate() failed: authentication error (/etc/pam.d/dovecot missing?) Now, I do not use pam on this system. Is there a way I can eliminate Dovecot from trying to use it? post your doveconf -n passdb { driver = pam } well, did you read the output? Yes I did. I created a dovecot.conf file and placed this in it: #passdb { # driver = pam #} It didn't work. Dovecot has so many individual conf files that it is difficult to figure out where everything is. I really like the Postfix method where the last rule wins. I have not figured out in what file the pam setting resides that is being picked up by Dovecot. Personally, I am not a fan of this multiple file configuration scenario. -- Jerry pgpoR90IK_3Qd.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Replication Advice Needed
I successfully set up Dovecot replication, having 2 servers syncing with each other. While I had both servers in the same room on a Gigabit network, they were syncing fine. But I took one to another location, and syncing was turned off for about 2 weeks. Now I've turned both back on, they're sort of syncing, but not really. The one remote server is not populating emails into various folders and it really should be cranking to sync those emails. Do anyone have any insights on how we could troubleshoot this? -- --Asai
Re: Virtual User Authentication
On 11.11.2014 16:13, Jerry wrote: Dovecot has so many individual conf files that it is difficult to figure out where everything is. I really like the Postfix method where the last rule wins. It's just the same with dovecot. I have not figured out in what file the pam setting resides that is being picked up by Dovecot. Give grep a chance. Regards, Christian -- No signature available.
FTS-Solr: indexer-worker does not find mailbox
Greetings, I am running Dovecot v. 2.2.13 on a Gentoo Box. Mail users are virtual, data for them is stored in a MySQL-DB, Sieve is enabled and deliver is the LDA in conjunction with Postfix. This setup has been running for a few years now without problems, the configuration works. Some weeks ago the setup was still on a Ubuntu 12.04 LTS box, and Dovecot was v. 2.0.9. I've installed a Tomcat there with Solr and configured the FTS-Solr plugin from Dovecot. Worked like a charm without any problems at all. Now the same setup on the Gentoo box does not work at all; either indexer-worker does not find the directory or is just indexing 0 messages. Solr is also installed again (v. 3.6.0) on Tomcat, and Solr is running properly. I checked it with my browser and the logs, they are showing no errors. gentoo ~ # dovecot --version 2.2.13 dovecot -n: http://pastebin.com/NqLfrbp8 dovecot-sql.conf: http://pastebin.com/KLf4pjJZ Debug log. Nov 11 20:12:14 kraftzwerg dovecot: indexer-worker: Debug: auth input: m...@marc-stuermer.de home=/var/kunden/mail/ mail=maildir:marc/m...@marc-stuermer.de/ uid=9997 gid=9997 Nov 11 20:12:14 kraftzwerg dovecot: indexer-worker: Debug: Added userdb setting: mail=maildir:marc/m...@marc-stuermer.de/ Nov 11 20:12:14 kraftzwerg dovecot: indexer-worker(m...@marc-stuermer.de): Debug: Effective uid=9997, gid=9997, home=/var/kunden/mail/ Nov 11 20:12:14 kraftzwerg dovecot: indexer-worker(m...@marc-stuermer.de): Debug: Namespace : type=private, prefix=INBOX., sep=., inbox=yes, hidden=no, list=yes, subscriptions=yes location=maildir:marc/m...@marc-stuermer.de/ Nov 11 20:12:14 kraftzwerg dovecot: indexer-worker(m...@marc-stuermer.de): Debug: maildir++: root=marc/m...@marc-stuermer.de, index=, indexpvt=, control=, inbox=marc/m...@marc-stuermer.de, alt= Nov 11 20:12:14 kraftzwerg dovecot: indexer-worker(m...@marc-stuermer.de): Debug: Namespace INBOX.: marc/m...@marc-stuermer.de doesn't exist yet, using default permissions Nov 11 20:12:14 kraftzwerg dovecot: indexer-worker(m...@marc-stuermer.de): Debug: Namespace INBOX.: Using permissions from marc/m...@marc-stuermer.de: mode=0700 gid=default Nov 11 20:12:14 kraftzwerg dovecot: indexer-worker(m...@marc-stuermer.de): Debug: Namespace : type=private, prefix=, sep=, inbox=no, hidden=yes, list=no, subscriptions=no location=fail::LAYOUT=none Nov 11 20:12:14 kraftzwerg dovecot: indexer-worker(m...@marc-stuermer.de): Debug: none: root=, index=, indexpvt=, control=, inbox=, alt= Nov 11 20:12:14 kraftzwerg dovecot: indexer-worker(m...@marc-stuermer.de): Debug: Syncing mailbox INBOX.gentoo failed: Mailbox doesn't exist: INBOX.gentoo Nov 11 20:12:14 kraftzwerg dovecot: imap(m...@marc-stuermer.de): Error: indexer failed to index mailbox INBOX.gentoo So the question is: where's the error and how to fix it? I am kinda clueless right now. Thanks in advance, Marc
Help with last_login plugin
Hi, I want to have a datetime column in my users table, to have the value updated every time my users login via POP3/IMAP. Last_login is new but I don't see any query example, or field names or so. Does anyone can give an help on this? Thanks,
Re: Help with last_login plugin
On 11/11/2014 08:55 PM, Jorge Bastos wrote: Hi, I want to have a datetime column in my users table, to have the value updated every time my users login via POP3/IMAP. Last_login is new but I don't see any query example, or field names or so. Does anyone can give an help on this? This topic was discussed a few days ago. See http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-October/098300.html Regards, Pascal -- The trapper recommends today: cafefeed.1431...@localdomain.org
Re: Virtual User Authentication
Jerry je...@seibercom.net writes: Personally, I am not a fan of this multiple file configuration scenario. Then don't use it. Concatenate all the included files together and throw out the settings you don't need. My (single) config file is ~340 lines, 2/3 of which are comments. Joseph am jtam.h...@gmail.com
Query: SELECT INBOX permission denied
Yesterday I was forced to migrate servers due to a hardware failure. I have been able to bring up my mail server, and set up Squirrelmail and Dovecot. I am able to access (via Squirrelmail) all users' mail except one - which happens to be my wife's, so it would be really helpful if I could get that working too. I am able to log in, but see the following message in the main pane: ERROR: Could not complete request. Query: SELECT INBOX Reason Given: [NOPERM] Permission denied I have see similar errors in my searches, but they all relate to *creating* files (inbox, sent, etc). The files do already exist here, they used to work in the same directory structure on the old server configuration, and I can see no relative difference between this user's files/permissions and working users' files/permissions. Suggestions are welcome; thanks in advance, -Don Here are the vitals: Version: 2.2.10 OS: CentOS 7 # 2.2.10: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.10.0-123.9.3.el7.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS Linux release 7.0.1406 (Core) ext3 auth_mechanisms = plain login disable_plaintext_auth = no log_path = /var/log/dovecot.log mail_location = mbox:/home/%u/~mail:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%u mbox_write_locks = fcntl namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox Sent Messages { special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { special_use = \Trash } prefix = } passdb { driver = pam } ssl = required ssl_cert = /etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key = /etc/pki/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem userdb { driver = passwd } [root@dungeon sandra]# ls -la /var/spool/mail total 2097152 drwxrwxr-x. 2 root mail 4096 Nov 11 22:10 . drwxr-xr-x. 16 root root 4096 Nov 11 14:21 .. -rw-rw. 1 sandra mail 625547161 Nov 11 21:32 sandra -rw-rw. 1 spamtrap_000 mail 26773946 Nov 11 20:53 spamtrap_000 -rw-rw. 1 spamtrap_001 mail3092961 Nov 11 22:10 spamtrap_001 -rw-rw. 1 spamtrap_002 mail8778257 Nov 11 00:03 spamtrap_002 -rw-rw. 1 spamtrap_003 mail 63579856 Nov 11 21:21 spamtrap_003 Her directory: [root@dungeon .imap]# ls -la total 100 drw---. 25 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 . drwx--. 4 sandra sandra 4096 Nov 10 10:48 .. drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 bday drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 beads drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 books drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 Drafts drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 ham drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Nov 11 21:39 INBOX drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 Sent drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 spam drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 Trash drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 Work A working directory: [root@dungeon .imap]# ls -la total 56 drwx--. 14 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Oct 23 19:22 . drwx--. 3 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Nov 10 09:15 .. drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Jun 8 08:40 Deleted Messages drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Aug 11 2011 Drafts drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Mar 18 2011 ham drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Nov 11 21:21 INBOX drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Oct 18 2013 Sent drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Aug 28 09:55 Sent Messages drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Oct 6 20:11 spam drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Nov 11 21:21 Trash
New director features
I implemented a couple of larger director changes today. These could still be changed a bit if somebody has any ideas. http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/b9df3d654710 Support for director tags, which allow creating multiple Dovecot backend groups using a single director ring. So you can mark different backend hosts with @tag names and then have passdb lookup return the wanted tag for each user. Note that because director works using user hashes, two users with the same hash can't be in different backend groups. Use doveadm director map -u user@domain to see which hash is used by the user@domain. http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/b9df3d654710 Added director_consistent_hashing=yes setting so users don't move around much when backend servers are added/removed. Ideally at some point this setting will be removed and directors will automatically switch to it when all the directors in the ring support it.
Re: Disabling SSLv3 protocol
On 09 Nov 2014, at 08:22, Jelmer Vernooij jel...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:25:32PM -0700, Timo Sirainen wrote: Since people are now talking about the SSLv3 security hole and how to disable it, here's a thread where you can talk about that. In Dovecot v2.1+ you can disable SSLv3 by setting: ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 In older versions you'd have to patch the source code. Attached a patch against v2.0. Do you have any plans to make this (SSLv3 disabled) the new default for ssl_protocols? I'm considering doing this in the Debian package. Yeah, I'm planning to do it for Dovecot v2.3 at least. I'm not sure if I should change it to v2.2.x. I guess I could, because apparently there aren't any commonly used clients that support only SSLv3. But then again I don't think SSLv3 is especially exploitable with IMAP/POP3 protocols.
Re: Query: SELECT INBOX permission denied
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Don Levey wrote: Yesterday I was forced to migrate servers due to a hardware failure. I have been able to bring up my mail server, and set up Squirrelmail and Dovecot. I am able to access (via Squirrelmail) all users' mail except one - which happens to be my wife's, so it would be really helpful if I could get that working too. I am able to log in, but see the following message in the main pane: ERROR: Could not complete request. Query: SELECT INBOX Reason Given: [NOPERM] Permission denied Post the logs from Dovecot, too. I have see similar errors in my searches, but they all relate to *creating* files (inbox, sent, etc). The files do already exist here, they used to work in the same directory structure on the old server configuration, and I can see no relative difference between this user's files/permissions and working users' files/permissions. Suggestions are welcome; thanks in advance, -Don Here are the vitals: Version: 2.2.10 OS: CentOS 7 # 2.2.10: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.10.0-123.9.3.el7.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS Linux release 7.0.1406 (Core) ext3 auth_mechanisms = plain login disable_plaintext_auth = no log_path = /var/log/dovecot.log mail_location = mbox:/home/%u/~mail:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%u mbox_write_locks = fcntl namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox Sent Messages { special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { special_use = \Trash } prefix = } passdb { driver = pam } ssl = required ssl_cert = /etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key = /etc/pki/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem userdb { driver = passwd } [root@dungeon sandra]# ls -la /var/spool/mail total 2097152 drwxrwxr-x. 2 root mail 4096 Nov 11 22:10 . drwxr-xr-x. 16 root root 4096 Nov 11 14:21 .. -rw-rw. 1 sandra mail 625547161 Nov 11 21:32 sandra -rw-rw. 1 spamtrap_000 mail 26773946 Nov 11 20:53 spamtrap_000 -rw-rw. 1 spamtrap_001 mail3092961 Nov 11 22:10 spamtrap_001 -rw-rw. 1 spamtrap_002 mail8778257 Nov 11 00:03 spamtrap_002 -rw-rw. 1 spamtrap_003 mail 63579856 Nov 11 21:21 spamtrap_003 Her directory: [root@dungeon .imap]# ls -la total 100 drw---. 25 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 . drwx--. 4 sandra sandra 4096 Nov 10 10:48 .. drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 bday drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 beads drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 books drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 Drafts drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 ham drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Nov 11 21:39 INBOX drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 Sent drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 spam drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 Trash drwx--. 2 sandra sandra 4096 Jul 1 2008 Work A working directory: [root@dungeon .imap]# ls -la total 56 drwx--. 14 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Oct 23 19:22 . drwx--. 3 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Nov 10 09:15 .. drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Jun 8 08:40 Deleted Messages drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Aug 11 2011 Drafts drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Mar 18 2011 ham drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Nov 11 21:21 INBOX drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Oct 18 2013 Sent drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Aug 28 09:55 Sent Messages drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Oct 6 20:11 spam drwx--. 2 spamtrap_003 spamtrap_003 4096 Nov 11 21:21 Trash - -- Steffen Kaiser -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBVGL8H3z1H7kL/d9rAQLVSggAsAzg0Qsiyw1Y97gIw3FyGrLLn2PYQd30 9yzHBw60r5CYbUKrWDm4GwMy5HTfFqfGlz0OQ+QaXIm960a8NNGUmkUlHCXoQdTf R1k1BX8RVSlFGcm1pQkUuZEOvjUy0kIjOh4vU48iWiZJD0fRSLE8zIPbRQcff9x+ MU/+NvgJ2iGXSPlAnT5XKiT++l7k6i4LpDvcGFPXd4Q/fXXMyabpTuZTLjGnqtCu vXqAGsBsSgXt5jsgJsB5bfO/fZh8llcNMAlrFFdcLtJAYrY6FvQIEPU5tUFqXQTS O54/K9KcyjelFU1zGoIiqRylojZrtV/GHi1ZKRyFBRpwOI9Cr0XAeQ== =TP5S -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Disabling SSLv3 protocol
Timo Sirainen: ... I don't think SSLv3 is especially exploitable with IMAP/POP3 protocols. It's well known SSLv3 *is* a problem for HTTP, we assume, it isn't for SMTP/POP/IMAP Administrators, also responsible for putting new paper in the printer, may not have the skill to distinguish in that detail. They see the panic in HTTP and see no action on other Application. What do they learn? On the other side: If we consequently disable the broken protocol they /may/ see Ah, SSLv3 REALLY seem to be broken, the experts disable it here and there and over there, too The attention is much higher. Andreas