Re: [Dovecot] Courier-Dovecot Migration Issue

2010-02-18 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 11:31 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
  The last three entries exist in the Courier IMAP file, but NOT the Courier
  POP file.  The resulting dovecot-uidlist format is different, but to be
  honest, I haven't been able to find the exact specification for the format
  of the dovecot-uidlist file (if it exists).
.-
 During the migration, it appears that the emphasis is placed on 
 maintaining the Pop3 message sequence...at the cost of possibly changing 
 IMAP UIDs.

Well, with v1.1+ it's possible to preserve both POP3 and IMAP UIDs (each
line is IMAP uid PPOP3 UIDL :filename). I guess the script doesn't
merge IMAP and POP3 messages well enough. Feel free to fix the script ;)

 Here's a question though.  If the dovecot-uidlist file is deleted (for 
 whatever reason), it gets rebuilt by Dovecot.  But, how does it get 
 rebuilt?  It does not appear to generate uids based on the date of 
 messages...I believe that to be true.  Is there any flag/option in 
 Dovecot to build the uidlist file based on message date (uids ordered by 
 date)?

The added mails are ordered by their filename. The filename typically
begins with timestamp of when the message was received, so it's
practically in the same order as mails were received.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Dovecot] Courier-Dovecot Migration Issue

2010-02-18 Thread Tony Rutherford

Timo Sirainen wrote:

On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 11:31 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
  

The last three entries exist in the Courier IMAP file, but NOT the Courier
POP file.  The resulting dovecot-uidlist format is different, but to be
honest, I haven't been able to find the exact specification for the format
of the dovecot-uidlist file (if it exists).
  

.-
  
During the migration, it appears that the emphasis is placed on 
maintaining the Pop3 message sequence...at the cost of possibly changing 
IMAP UIDs.



Well, with v1.1+ it's possible to preserve both POP3 and IMAP UIDs (each
line is IMAP uid PPOP3 UIDL :filename). I guess the script doesn't
merge IMAP and POP3 messages well enough. Feel free to fix the script ;)

  
Here's a question though.  If the dovecot-uidlist file is deleted (for 
whatever reason), it gets rebuilt by Dovecot.  But, how does it get 
rebuilt?  It does not appear to generate uids based on the date of 
messages...I believe that to be true.  Is there any flag/option in 
Dovecot to build the uidlist file based on message date (uids ordered by 
date)?



The added mails are ordered by their filename. The filename typically
begins with timestamp of when the message was received, so it's
practically in the same order as mails were received.


  


Yes, unless you're unfortunate enough to be supporting a non-standard legacy message name 
format based on uuidgen!I did see the function where it attempts to compare based on 
the standard filename format...but again, unfortunately I have to deal with 
non-standard as well as the standard format :(

Thanks,
Tony




Re: [Dovecot] Courier-Dovecot Migration Issue

2010-02-18 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:26 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
  Well, with v1.1+ it's possible to preserve both POP3 and IMAP UIDs (each
  line is IMAP uid PPOP3 UIDL :filename). I guess the script doesn't
  merge IMAP and POP3 messages well enough. Feel free to fix the script ;)
 
 Yes, unless you're unfortunate enough to be supporting a non-standard
 legacy message name format based on uuidgen!

I've no idea what uuidgen is, but..

 I did see the function where it attempts to compare based on the
 standard filename format...but again, unfortunately I have to deal
 with non-standard as well as the standard format :(

No, it works with everything with Dovecot v1.1+. Like it says above, you
can have in dovecot-uidlist:

1 Phello-world :12345.blah.host:2,

Now when opening such mailbox with POP3 and issuing UIDL command, you
actually get:

1 hello-world



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Dovecot] Courier-Dovecot Migration Issue

2010-02-18 Thread Tony Rutherford

Timo Sirainen wrote:

On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:26 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
  

Well, with v1.1+ it's possible to preserve both POP3 and IMAP UIDs (each
line is IMAP uid PPOP3 UIDL :filename). I guess the script doesn't
merge IMAP and POP3 messages well enough. Feel free to fix the script ;)
  

Yes, unless you're unfortunate enough to be supporting a non-standard
legacy message name format based on uuidgen!



I've no idea what uuidgen is, but..

  

I did see the function where it attempts to compare based on the
standard filename format...but again, unfortunately I have to deal
with non-standard as well as the standard format :(



No, it works with everything with Dovecot v1.1+. Like it says above, you
can have in dovecot-uidlist:

1 Phello-world :12345.blah.host:2,

Now when opening such mailbox with POP3 and issuing UIDL command, you
actually get:

1 hello-world

  
uuidgen generates a random unique identifier with no way of gathering a 
date/time stamp from it.  Here's an example filename: 
ffad8168_ce4b_4d25_a54d_290ed9b3a7f6:2,S  It's not ideal for many, 
many reasons...


Tony


Re: [Dovecot] Courier-Dovecot Migration Issue

2010-02-18 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:26 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
  Here's a question though.  If the dovecot-uidlist file is deleted (for 
  whatever reason), it gets rebuilt by Dovecot.  But, how does it get 
  rebuilt?  It does not appear to generate uids based on the date of 
  messages...I believe that to be true.  Is there any flag/option in 
  Dovecot to build the uidlist file based on message date (uids ordered by 
  date)?
  
 
  The added mails are ordered by their filename. The filename typically
  begins with timestamp of when the message was received, so it's
  practically in the same order as mails were received.
 
 

 
 Yes, unless you're unfortunate enough to be supporting a non-standard legacy 
 message name format based on uuidgen!I did see the function where it 
 attempts to compare based on the standard filename format...but again, 
 unfortunately I have to deal with non-standard as well as the standard format 
 :(

Oh, this was for the above question. I was mixing it up with the other
one. Right, yeah, doesn't look like it's all that great then. But you're
kind of in the minority. :) And this shouldn't be a real problem
typically in any case. Only in the migration case, and the migration
script could be fixed for that.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Dovecot] Courier-Dovecot Migration Issue

2010-02-17 Thread Tony Rutherford

Tony Rutherford wrote:

For testing purposes, on a small set of users, we've run the
courier-dovecot-migrate.pl script.   We are converting from Courier 0.43 to
Dovecot 1.2.9.  For the most part, things seem to be ok.  However, an iPhone
IMAP client user is reporting a problem where some of her messages don't
show up.  Even stranger is the fact that these same messages do appear when
using Outlook 2k7 for instance.  The common denominator for when the
messages are missing seems to be whether or not the message appeared in both
the Courier IMAP and Courier POP3 uid files.  The missing messages appear in
the CourierIMAP file, but NOT the Courier POP file.  Here is a snippet from
the resulting Dovecot-uidlist file:

 


3 V1141844265 N12392

9338 P00cf2eb6_fadc_4992_ad3a_57cc83a16eab W5146
:00cf2eb6_fadc_4992_ad3a_57cc83a16eab:2,S

9788 P0b18a2d6_97dd_4712_a09c_23c7a3d59467 W4055
:0b18a2d6_97dd_4712_a09c_23c7a3d59467:2,S

9942 P0b3cfd0b_1fc7_47b3_805f_b369a3bb6c65 W4359
:0b3cfd0b_1fc7_47b3_805f_b369a3bb6c65:2,S

10100 Pe178f1ed_d648_47e8_807a_3e2d655d7f84 W12028
:e178f1ed_d648_47e8_807a_3e2d655d7f84:2,S

10101 Pe3f28a53_a4d4_4f3d_babe_5df72bc35b47 W13974
:e3f28a53_a4d4_4f3d_babe_5df72bc35b47:2,S

10102 Pf3c3024b_2850_43ef_a397_d5cae5c8f537 W7177
:f3c3024b_2850_43ef_a397_d5cae5c8f537:2,S

10104 P6e808a68_0a7b_4528_aa67_4cc16361c56b W10817
:6e808a68_0a7b_4528_aa67_4cc16361c56b:2,S

10105 P65c8218d_7b2a_43b7_82a4_2743025bd954 W3579
:65c8218d_7b2a_43b7_82a4_2743025bd954:2,S

10106 P963cc43e_0355_481e_99d5_5468708bc28f W6410
:963cc43e_0355_481e_99d5_5468708bc28f:2,S

10107 P1405aefc_b98b_4a35_a7dd_a69199f724d0 W4703
:1405aefc_b98b_4a35_a7dd_a69199f724d0:2,S

10108 P67908fad_ec0a_4786_b0f1_c7cfaa23d09a W127288
:67908fad_ec0a_4786_b0f1_c7cfaa23d09a:2,S

10109 :9176f3b2_1927_4657_baa8_bfe4c39e89d4:2,S

10110 :79047185_aef7_48ec_aff2_6b71bd566acd:2,S

10111 :efe275a0_a7a8_4f47_b638_45a18bc0b108:2,S

 


The last three entries exist in the Courier IMAP file, but NOT the Courier
POP file.  The resulting dovecot-uidlist format is different, but to be
honest, I haven't been able to find the exact specification for the format
of the dovecot-uidlist file (if it exists).

 


What is really strange to me is: If there was a problem with the migration
script and resulting dovecot-uidlist file, why would these messages show up
fine in some client (ex. Outlook) and not others (ex. iPhone).

 


Regards,

Tony


  
During the migration, it appears that the emphasis is placed on 
maintaining the Pop3 message sequence...at the cost of possibly changing 
IMAP UIDs.  The iPhone appears to go very strictly by the actual order 
of the IMAP uids...and since they're now out of sync...the messages 
appear to be out of order on the iPhone client.  I understand the 
importance of ensuring that pop clients don't redownload  messages...so 
tough to argue.


Here's a question though.  If the dovecot-uidlist file is deleted (for 
whatever reason), it gets rebuilt by Dovecot.  But, how does it get 
rebuilt?  It does not appear to generate uids based on the date of 
messages...I believe that to be true.  Is there any flag/option in 
Dovecot to build the uidlist file based on message date (uids ordered by 
date)?  The problem is that if they're not ordered by date, again, when 
the iPhone gets the first 200 messages, they may not necessarily be the 
latest 200 messages.  Also...this behaviour does not appear in other 
clients we've tested...TB and Outlook2007.


Tony


[Dovecot] Courier-Dovecot Migration Issue

2010-02-16 Thread Tony Rutherford
For testing purposes, on a small set of users, we've run the
courier-dovecot-migrate.pl script.   We are converting from Courier 0.43 to
Dovecot 1.2.9.  For the most part, things seem to be ok.  However, an iPhone
IMAP client user is reporting a problem where some of her messages don't
show up.  Even stranger is the fact that these same messages do appear when
using Outlook 2k7 for instance.  The common denominator for when the
messages are missing seems to be whether or not the message appeared in both
the Courier IMAP and Courier POP3 uid files.  The missing messages appear in
the CourierIMAP file, but NOT the Courier POP file.  Here is a snippet from
the resulting Dovecot-uidlist file:

 

3 V1141844265 N12392

9338 P00cf2eb6_fadc_4992_ad3a_57cc83a16eab W5146
:00cf2eb6_fadc_4992_ad3a_57cc83a16eab:2,S

9788 P0b18a2d6_97dd_4712_a09c_23c7a3d59467 W4055
:0b18a2d6_97dd_4712_a09c_23c7a3d59467:2,S

9942 P0b3cfd0b_1fc7_47b3_805f_b369a3bb6c65 W4359
:0b3cfd0b_1fc7_47b3_805f_b369a3bb6c65:2,S

10100 Pe178f1ed_d648_47e8_807a_3e2d655d7f84 W12028
:e178f1ed_d648_47e8_807a_3e2d655d7f84:2,S

10101 Pe3f28a53_a4d4_4f3d_babe_5df72bc35b47 W13974
:e3f28a53_a4d4_4f3d_babe_5df72bc35b47:2,S

10102 Pf3c3024b_2850_43ef_a397_d5cae5c8f537 W7177
:f3c3024b_2850_43ef_a397_d5cae5c8f537:2,S

10104 P6e808a68_0a7b_4528_aa67_4cc16361c56b W10817
:6e808a68_0a7b_4528_aa67_4cc16361c56b:2,S

10105 P65c8218d_7b2a_43b7_82a4_2743025bd954 W3579
:65c8218d_7b2a_43b7_82a4_2743025bd954:2,S

10106 P963cc43e_0355_481e_99d5_5468708bc28f W6410
:963cc43e_0355_481e_99d5_5468708bc28f:2,S

10107 P1405aefc_b98b_4a35_a7dd_a69199f724d0 W4703
:1405aefc_b98b_4a35_a7dd_a69199f724d0:2,S

10108 P67908fad_ec0a_4786_b0f1_c7cfaa23d09a W127288
:67908fad_ec0a_4786_b0f1_c7cfaa23d09a:2,S

10109 :9176f3b2_1927_4657_baa8_bfe4c39e89d4:2,S

10110 :79047185_aef7_48ec_aff2_6b71bd566acd:2,S

10111 :efe275a0_a7a8_4f47_b638_45a18bc0b108:2,S

 

The last three entries exist in the Courier IMAP file, but NOT the Courier
POP file.  The resulting dovecot-uidlist format is different, but to be
honest, I haven't been able to find the exact specification for the format
of the dovecot-uidlist file (if it exists).

 

What is really strange to me is: If there was a problem with the migration
script and resulting dovecot-uidlist file, why would these messages show up
fine in some client (ex. Outlook) and not others (ex. iPhone).

 

Regards,

Tony