Re: [Dovecot] Mailbox conversion/importing

2013-06-18 Thread mourik jan SOGo

Hi,

We have used Rick's tools to migrate from scalix to dovecot, and they 
worked out incredibly well for us. Also Rick was very responsive to 
questions and suggestions.


I consider it $35 USD well spent.

And that's the end of this commercial. ;-)

Mourik Jan

On 06/17/2013 04:31 AM, Rick Sanders wrote:



A specialised migration tool must be less tested (and perhaps more buggy)
than pop/imap servers that are in use around the world constantly.


On the other hand a tool which is specifically built to do IMAP migration
can do the job quickly and efficiently.  My experience is that a
well-designed IMAP Migration tool which has been tested over the years is
often the best bet.

Just my own 2 cents worth.

Rick Sanders
rfs9...@earthlink.net

http://www.athensfbc.com/imap-tools





Re: [Dovecot] Mailbox conversion/importing

2013-06-17 Thread Rick Sanders

 A specialised migration tool must be less tested (and perhaps more buggy)
 than pop/imap servers that are in use around the world constantly. 

On the other hand a tool which is specifically built to do IMAP migration
can do the job quickly and efficiently.  My experience is that a
well-designed IMAP Migration tool which has been tested over the years is
often the best bet.

Just my own 2 cents worth.

Rick Sanders
rfs9...@earthlink.net

http://www.athensfbc.com/imap-tools





[Dovecot] Mailbox conversion/importing

2013-06-10 Thread Alan Brown


I've been tasked with importing a large bunch of mbox folders (about 
500) into an existing mdbox setup in Dovecot 2.1


As far as I can see, dsync mirror or backup are both inappropriate 
ways of doing this. Does anyone have any suggestions about how I could 
proceed?


Thanks in advance






Re: [Dovecot] Mailbox conversion/importing - SOLVED

2013-06-10 Thread Alan Brown

On 10/06/13 12:03, Alan Brown wrote:


I've been tasked with importing a large bunch of mbox folders (about
500) into an existing mdbox setup in Dovecot 2.1

As far as I can see, dsync mirror or backup are both inappropriate
ways of doing this. Does anyone have any suggestions about how I could
proceed?


I've finally discovered doveadm import.

In this instance:  doveadm -Dv import -u [user]  mbox:/full/path/to/mbox 
old-mbox all



Relative paths don't work. :)






Re: [Dovecot] Mailbox conversion/importing

2013-06-10 Thread Robert Brockway

On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Alan Brown wrote:

I've been tasked with importing a large bunch of mbox folders (about 500) 
into an existing mdbox setup in Dovecot 2.1


As far as I can see, dsync mirror or backup are both inappropriate ways 
of doing this. Does anyone have any suggestions about how I could proceed?


I've done a variety of mail migrations over the years, including some that 
were quite large (hundreds of thousands of accounts).  I looked at a few 
options when doing the first one and ended up concluding that pop/imap was 
the best way to go.  A specialised migration tool must be less tested (and 
perhaps more buggy) than pop/imap servers that are in use around the world 
constantly.  By using pop/imap proxies we were able to do migrations that 
were completely transparent to users.


This presumes that you are migrating from one server to another.  I've 
always done it like this, rather than having to worry about multiple 
storage formats on the one server.


Cheers,

Rob

--
Email: rob...@timetraveller.org Linux counter ID #16440
IRC: Solver (OFTC  Freenode)
Web: http://www.practicalsysadmin.com
Director, Software in the Public Interest (http://spi-inc.org/)
Information is a gas


Re: [Dovecot] Mailbox conversion/importing

2013-06-10 Thread Frerich Raabe
Hi Robert,

On Jun 10, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Robert Brockway rob...@timetraveller.org wrote:
 I've done a variety of mail migrations over the years, including some that 
 were quite large (hundreds of thousands of accounts).  I looked at a few 
 options when doing the first one and ended up concluding that pop/imap was 
 the best way to go.  A specialised migration tool must be less tested (and 
 perhaps more buggy) than pop/imap servers that are in use around the world 
 constantly.  By using pop/imap proxies we were able to do migrations that 
 were completely transparent to users.

I think this sounds very plausible - can you maybe elaborate a bit on how you 
did this exactly?

Would you say that it even makes sense to use a proxy-based migration if you're 
moving from one Dovecot installation (serving just IMAP) to another?

I'm just asking because I'm planning to replace a FreeBSD-based Dovecot setup 
(serving just IMAP) to Debian. I already have the Debian system set up, but I'm 
still undecided how to do the move in a way which is a) preferrably transparent 
to users and b) possibly even allows me to quickly switch back to the old 
system again, just in case.

-- 
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing