El Miércoles, 2 de Julio de 2008 a las 13:50, Charles Marcus escribió:
On 7/2/2008, Mark Zealey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This mail is subject to http://www.gxn.net/disclaimer
Wow... good idea for disclaimers (I hate them)...
IANAL, but: It's not only that we all hate them; also they are questionable in
a legal point of view. They are based on:
- It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this
communication in error please notify the sender
Yeah; I got the message, so I'm the addresee. No point here. And my telephatic
powers are down now, so I can't know if it's been an error or not.
- delete this message from your system without copying or disseminating it
or placing any reliance upon its contents
Well, you sent it to me, so it's mine now. Sending a message to me doesn't
give you the power to tell me what should I do; otherwise, I could say
something like send me all the files in your hard disk so I can verify you
save no copy of this messages or even send me 1000$.
- Confidentially
Under spanish law, I have to SIGN a contract BEFORE I access to the
confidential content. No contract, no confidentially. They can not show me
some content and, later, tell me it was confidential.
Some interesting articles about this:
- in spanish:
http://www.iabogado.com/esp/blogcfm/1/2007/12/Los-avisos-de-confidencialidad-en-los-correos-esos-engendros-jurdicos.cfm
- in english:
http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
And yes, I'm really tired of this messages...
Aagur.
--
Joseba Torre. CIDIR Bizkaia.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
