RE: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

2016-06-26 Thread Michael Fox
> Actually we're one the way to get
> the book back into the shop into the next few weeks.
> 
> Peer


That's great news!  English version please!

Michael


Re: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

2016-06-26 Thread Edgar Pettijohn


Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 26, 2016, at 2:22 AM, phil  wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 26/06/2016 4:50 PM, Peer Heinlein wrote:
>> Am 25.06.2016 um 21:52 schrieb "Jan Büren":
>> 
>> 
 I've been trying to obtain an English copy of the Dovecot book for months,
 prior to starting this project.  So far, I just can't find a copy.  It's
 too
 bad that the author/publisher won't do a second printing or, if they're
 not
 interested in making any more money, then release it to the public domain
>> 
>> The book company has to shut down their business last december.
>> 
>> It took some time to get the copyrights back, to talk to some other book
>> companies and to get everything ready. Actually we're one the way to get
>> the book back into the shop into the next few weeks.
>> 
>> Peer
> In English as well this time Peer?
> I will buy a copy if it is available in English . . .
> 
Me too.

Re: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

2016-06-26 Thread phil

On 26/06/2016 4:50 PM, Peer Heinlein wrote:
> Am 25.06.2016 um 21:52 schrieb "Jan Büren":
> 
> 
>>> I've been trying to obtain an English copy of the Dovecot book for months,
>>> prior to starting this project.  So far, I just can't find a copy.  It's
>>> too
>>> bad that the author/publisher won't do a second printing or, if they're
>>> not
>>> interested in making any more money, then release it to the public domain
> 
> The book company has to shut down their business last december.
> 
> It took some time to get the copyrights back, to talk to some other book
> companies and to get everything ready. Actually we're one the way to get
> the book back into the shop into the next few weeks.
> 
> Peer
> 
> 
In English as well this time Peer?
I will buy a copy if it is available in English . . .



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

2016-06-26 Thread Peer Heinlein
Am 25.06.2016 um 21:52 schrieb "Jan Büren":


>> I've been trying to obtain an English copy of the Dovecot book for months,
>> prior to starting this project.  So far, I just can't find a copy.  It's
>> too
>> bad that the author/publisher won't do a second printing or, if they're
>> not
>> interested in making any more money, then release it to the public domain

The book company has to shut down their business last december.

It took some time to get the copyrights back, to talk to some other book
companies and to get everything ready. Actually we're one the way to get
the book back into the shop into the next few weeks.

Peer


-- 
Heinlein Support GmbH
Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin

http://www.heinlein-support.de

Tel: 030 / 405051-42
Fax: 030 / 405051-19

Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht
Berlin-Charlottenburg,
Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin


RE: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

2016-06-25 Thread Noel Butler

On 26/06/2016 02:39, Michael Fox wrote:
The most crucial difference is that LDA is intended for delivering 
email

to a *real* user.

Aki



Thanks Aki.

Pardon my ignorance, but why does it matter?  In other words, what is
it that makes LDA better for a *real* user and LMTP better for a
virtual user?

Thanks,
Michael


We've used LDA for virtual users for a very very long time, though we 
use multiple front ends, each with postfix/dovecot and mysql (replicated 
DB) they all talk to one big storage backend via NFS (as do the 
pop3/imap/webmails servers), we looked at lmtp once but saw no 
advantages given the setup.



--
If you have the urge to reply to all rather than reply to list, you best
first read  http://members.ausics.net/qwerty/


RE: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

2016-06-25 Thread Michael Fox
> imho wiki is the way to go to be up2date with information, else it would
> make more sense to make more informative man pages in dovecot, that will
> never be outdated

I agree that the wiki is useful and important.  It just doesn't have any
depth regarding the "why" and "how" part of the equation.  For example, WHY
LMTP vs. LDA (just one example).  There are many config snippets with a
couple of lines of explanation and not much about how they fit into the big
picture.  And some config examples (like the default_fields and
override_fields issue I reported earlier) simply don't work.

In the Postfix world, there is an old Postfix book (older than Peer's book)
which goes into a lot of the "why" and "how".  It takes you through the
whole process from nothing to a full-fledged server and really gives you the
big picture.  All of that is still valid today.  Then the postfix website is
the place to go for up-to-date description of each config option.  Even
there, the web pages contain much more descriptive information about each
config option -- how it's used, when, why, side-effects, etc.

If I knew what I was doing, I'd offer to help add to the wiki.  But as a
newbie, I don't even know what I don't know.  ;-)

So I'm hoping that Peer's book will provide that overall big-picture and
that I can find an English copy somehow.

Michael


Re: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

2016-06-25 Thread Benny Pedersen

On 2016-06-25 23:56, Michael Fox wrote:


Peer:  Is there any way to get an English copy of your book?


imho wiki is the way to go to be up2date with information, else it would 
make more sense to make more informative man pages in dovecot, that will 
never be outdated


that sayed i am intrested in the book aswell


RE: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

2016-06-25 Thread Michael Fox
Thanks again Jan.

I appear to have basic LMTP working now (messages are delivered to virtual
mailboxes of valid recipients and non-existent recipients are rejected).
Cool.  Still lots more work to do.

But I think I could really use the Dovecot book.  I find the wiki to be
lacking in explanation.  So, too often I'm just copying without knowing the
reason why or how some things fit together.

Peer:  Is there any way to get an English copy of your book?

Michael



> -Original Message-
> From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of "Jan
> Büren"
> Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 12:53 PM
> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Cc: Peer Heinlein <p.heinl...@heinlein-support.de>
> Subject: RE: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP
> 
> Hi Michael,
> we´ll actually the author is reading this list as well.
> Maybe he can help out here (cc).
> As far as I know went the publisher bancrupt and that´s why currently
> further prints and next books are delayed.
> 
> @Peer: Anyway, is there a english copy? More or less I am refering to the
> chapter LMTP with dovecot and postfix.
> 
> Hmm, just with the information in the dovecot wiki, there is at least the
> postfix part missing:
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP
> 
> Best luck,
> > Thanks Jan.
> >
> > I've been trying to obtain an English copy of the Dovecot book for
> months,
> > prior to starting this project.  So far, I just can't find a copy.  It's
> > too
> > bad that the author/publisher won't do a second printing or, if they're
> > not
> > interested in making any more money, then release it to the public
> domain
> > as
> > a PDF.  Very frustrating.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of "Jan
> >> Büren"
> >> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 10:00 AM
> >> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
> >> Subject: Re: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP
> >>
> >> Hi Michael,
> >>
> >> > I'd appreciate comments from experienced users of postfix with
> >> dovecot.
> >> > Are
> >> > you using Dovecot LDA or LMTP and why?
> >> I have LMTP with dovecot running on Ubuntu 14.04 and Ubuntu 16.04.
> >>
> >> LDA is the worser solution, this is best explained in chapter LTMP in
> >> Peers dovecot book, which is unluckily in german and more or less out
> of
> >> print.
> >>
> >> But you can easily grasp the configuration details and reverse engineer
> >> the technical german phrases ...
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks much,
> >> >
> >> > Michael
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> kivitendo mit Schnelleinstieg zu RB-Druckvorlagen im Linux-Magazin 07
> >> DELUG-DVD Ausgabe
> >>
> >> Richardson & Büren GmbH
> >> Jan Büren
> >> Kölnstr. 311
> >> 53117 Bonn
> >>
> >> USt-IdNr. DE238288407
> >> Telefon: 0228 92 98 2012
> >>
> >>
> >> Durchwahl: 0228 92 97 8965
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> kivitendo mit Schnelleinstieg zu RB-Druckvorlagen im Linux-Magazin 07
> DELUG-DVD Ausgabe
> 
> Richardson & Büren GmbH
> Jan Büren
> Weiherstraße 33a
> 53111 Bonn
> 
> USt-IdNr. DE238288407
> Telefon: 0228 92 98 2012
> 
> Durchwahl: 0228 92 97 8965


RE: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

2016-06-25 Thread Jan Büren
Hi Michael,
we´ll actually the author is reading this list as well.
Maybe he can help out here (cc).
As far as I know went the publisher bancrupt and that´s why currently
further prints and next books are delayed.

@Peer: Anyway, is there a english copy? More or less I am refering to the
chapter LMTP with dovecot and postfix.

Hmm, just with the information in the dovecot wiki, there is at least the
postfix part missing:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP

Best luck,
> Thanks Jan.
>
> I've been trying to obtain an English copy of the Dovecot book for months,
> prior to starting this project.  So far, I just can't find a copy.  It's
> too
> bad that the author/publisher won't do a second printing or, if they're
> not
> interested in making any more money, then release it to the public domain
> as
> a PDF.  Very frustrating.
>
> Michael
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of "Jan
>> Büren"
>> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 10:00 AM
>> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
>> Subject: Re: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP
>>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> > I'd appreciate comments from experienced users of postfix with
>> dovecot.
>> > Are
>> > you using Dovecot LDA or LMTP and why?
>> I have LMTP with dovecot running on Ubuntu 14.04 and Ubuntu 16.04.
>>
>> LDA is the worser solution, this is best explained in chapter LTMP in
>> Peers dovecot book, which is unluckily in german and more or less out of
>> print.
>>
>> But you can easily grasp the configuration details and reverse engineer
>> the technical german phrases ...
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks much,
>> >
>> > Michael
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> kivitendo mit Schnelleinstieg zu RB-Druckvorlagen im Linux-Magazin 07
>> DELUG-DVD Ausgabe
>>
>> Richardson & Büren GmbH
>> Jan Büren
>> Kölnstr. 311
>> 53117 Bonn
>>
>> USt-IdNr. DE238288407
>> Telefon: 0228 92 98 2012
>>
>>
>> Durchwahl: 0228 92 97 8965
>
>


-- 
kivitendo mit Schnelleinstieg zu RB-Druckvorlagen im Linux-Magazin 07
DELUG-DVD Ausgabe

Richardson & Büren GmbH
Jan Büren
Weiherstraße 33a
53111 Bonn

USt-IdNr. DE238288407
Telefon: 0228 92 98 2012

Durchwahl: 0228 92 97 8965


RE: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

2016-06-25 Thread Michael Fox
> The most crucial difference is that LDA is intended for delivering email
> to a *real* user.
> 
> Aki


Thanks Aki.

Pardon my ignorance, but why does it matter?  In other words, what is it that 
makes LDA better for a *real* user and LMTP better for a virtual user?

Thanks,
Michael


RE: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

2016-06-25 Thread Michael Fox
Thanks Jan.

I've been trying to obtain an English copy of the Dovecot book for months,
prior to starting this project.  So far, I just can't find a copy.  It's too
bad that the author/publisher won't do a second printing or, if they're not
interested in making any more money, then release it to the public domain as
a PDF.  Very frustrating.

Michael


> -Original Message-
> From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of "Jan
> Büren"
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 10:00 AM
> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Subject: Re: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> > I'd appreciate comments from experienced users of postfix with dovecot.
> > Are
> > you using Dovecot LDA or LMTP and why?
> I have LMTP with dovecot running on Ubuntu 14.04 and Ubuntu 16.04.
> 
> LDA is the worser solution, this is best explained in chapter LTMP in
> Peers dovecot book, which is unluckily in german and more or less out of
> print.
> 
> But you can easily grasp the configuration details and reverse engineer
> the technical german phrases ...
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks much,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> kivitendo mit Schnelleinstieg zu RB-Druckvorlagen im Linux-Magazin 07
> DELUG-DVD Ausgabe
> 
> Richardson & Büren GmbH
> Jan Büren
> Kölnstr. 311
> 53117 Bonn
> 
> USt-IdNr. DE238288407
> Telefon: 0228 92 98 2012
> 
> 
> Durchwahl: 0228 92 97 8965


Re: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

2016-06-24 Thread Jan Büren
Hi,

> But you can easily grasp the configuration details and reverse engineer
> the technical german phrases ...
Ah well, the link:
http://www.dovecot-buch.de/buch/vorwort-timo-sirainen/
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks much,
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> kivitendo mit Schnelleinstieg zu RB-Druckvorlagen im Linux-Magazin 07
> DELUG-DVD Ausgabe
>
> Richardson & Büren GmbH
> Jan Büren
> Kölnstr. 311
> 53117 Bonn
>
> USt-IdNr. DE238288407
> Telefon: 0228 92 98 2012
>
>
> Durchwahl: 0228 92 97 8965
>
>


-- 
kivitendo mit Schnelleinstieg zu RB-Druckvorlagen im Linux-Magazin 07
DELUG-DVD Ausgabe

Richardson & Büren GmbH
Jan Büren
Kölnstr. 311
53117 Bonn

USt-IdNr. DE238288407
Telefon: 0228 92 98 2012


Durchwahl: 0228 92 97 8965


Re: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

2016-06-24 Thread aki . tuomi
The most crucial difference is that LDA is intended for delivering email to a 
*real* user.

Aki

> On June 24, 2016 at 7:59 PM Jan Büren  wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> > I'd appreciate comments from experienced users of postfix with dovecot.
> > Are
> > you using Dovecot LDA or LMTP and why?
> I have LMTP with dovecot running on Ubuntu 14.04 and Ubuntu 16.04.
> 
> LDA is the worser solution, this is best explained in chapter LTMP in
> Peers dovecot book, which is unluckily in german and more or less out of
> print.
> 
> But you can easily grasp the configuration details and reverse engineer
> the technical german phrases ...
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks much,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> kivitendo mit Schnelleinstieg zu RB-Druckvorlagen im Linux-Magazin 07
> DELUG-DVD Ausgabe
> 
> Richardson & Büren GmbH
> Jan Büren
> Kölnstr. 311
> 53117 Bonn
> 
> USt-IdNr. DE238288407
> Telefon: 0228 92 98 2012
> 
> 
> Durchwahl: 0228 92 97 8965


Re: Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

2016-06-24 Thread Jan Büren
Hi Michael,

> I'd appreciate comments from experienced users of postfix with dovecot.
> Are
> you using Dovecot LDA or LMTP and why?
I have LMTP with dovecot running on Ubuntu 14.04 and Ubuntu 16.04.

LDA is the worser solution, this is best explained in chapter LTMP in
Peers dovecot book, which is unluckily in german and more or less out of
print.

But you can easily grasp the configuration details and reverse engineer
the technical german phrases ...


>
>
>
> Thanks much,
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>


-- 
kivitendo mit Schnelleinstieg zu RB-Druckvorlagen im Linux-Magazin 07
DELUG-DVD Ausgabe

Richardson & Büren GmbH
Jan Büren
Kölnstr. 311
53117 Bonn

USt-IdNr. DE238288407
Telefon: 0228 92 98 2012


Durchwahl: 0228 92 97 8965


Postfix and Dovecot LDA vs. LMTP

2016-06-24 Thread Michael Fox
I'm new to Dovecot and will be using it with Postfix.  I'm looking for
recommendations regarding the use of Dovecot's LDA or LMTP for virtual
mailbox delivery.

 

Many of the simple examples on the wiki use LDA.  So I've set that up
initially.  But apparently an advantage of LMTP is recipient verification.
So, as I understand it, LMTP would let Postfix know whether or not the
message was deliverable to a local virtual recipient without needing to have
a separate virtual recipients map in Postfix.  That sounds like a nice
simplification.

 

But I see in Ubuntu that the dovecot-lmtp package is not marked with the
Canonical support icon, like the pop, imap, and other packages are.  I don't
have a contract with Canonical.  But I'm wondering why they would not
support the lmtp package when they do support most of the others.  Is it
possible that the dovecot LMTP package is not as stable or reliable?

 

I'd appreciate comments from experienced users of postfix with dovecot.  Are
you using Dovecot LDA or LMTP and why?

 

Thanks much,

Michael