Re: dovecot replication (active-active) - server specs
we've got 2 new fileservers, they have each SSD HDDs for new-storage and 7200rpm SATA HDDs on RAID 5 with 10 TB for alt-storage Friends don't let friends use Raid5... http://www.baarf.com/ (Use Raid6 or something else...) Note, a common counter argument is that someone has full backups and can survive a rebuild, so the RAID5 is really just to increase uptime. I suggest you do the sums on silent corruption and compare with your data size. Bit rot seems to be an observable problem now. Scrub your arrays regularly and where possible use data integrity checks at higher levels (not much for linux, but ZFS offers this for other OSs) Good luck Ed W
Re: dovecot replication (active-active) - server specs
Hello Am 09.10.2014 um 20:41 schrieb Urban Loesch: Hi, Am 09.10.2014 12:35, schrieb Martin Schmidt: Our MX server is delivering ca. 30 GB new mails per day. Two IMAP proxy server get the connections from the users. Atm. without dovecot director. We've got around 700k connections per day (imap 200k / pop3 500k) Are this the hole connections per day? How many concurrend connections do you have at the same time on each server? we've got 3 Fileserver with ca. 1200 concurrend IMAP connections and ca. 50 concurrend POP3 connections on each server. So we want to make a new system. We desire the new system to use mdbox format ( bigger files, less I/O) and replication through dovecot replication (active/active) instead of drbd. I have no experience with dovecot replication (Still on our roadmap). We are currently using drbd on a 10Gbit dedicated link. Works very well for us. Each fileserver should know every mailbox/user and for the time being 2 dovecot proxies for the user connections (IMAP/POP). (later after the migration from the old system to the new, dovecot director instead of proxies, for caching reasons). As Florian said, enable zlib. This also decreases I/O, but needs a bit more of CPU. But not that much. Yes we have enabled it, estimated space saving is up to 40% we've got 2 new fileservers, they have each SSD HDDs for new-storage and 7200rpm SATA HDDs on RAID 5 with 10 TB for alt-storage 32 GB RAM per Server You also could move the INDEX files from mdbox to different SSDs. We are doing so with 40k accounts and 2TB user data. Index partition has only 22GB used and is increasing not very fast. On our testsystem we've got it also on a raid 1 SSD, only alt-storage is on raid 5. Looks good. Do you have some tips for the system? Do you believe 32 GB RAM are enough for one fileserver each and have you experience with the I/O Waiting problem with huge amounts of Data on the alt-storage? Could there be issues with the RAM, if one fileserver has a downtime, so the second one has to take over all mailboxes for a short amount of time? I think memory is not the problem. On IMAP/POP3 servers the main problem is I/O. But with dovecot mdbox and index files on SSD's we have no problem at the moment. On each of our 3 Fileserver we've got 16 GB RAM, 5-7 GB is used and rest is cached. You might be right, the i/o is always the bottleneck. In general are only 2 new fileserver enough or should we think in bigger dimensions, like 4 fileserver Storage expansion in the new servers should not be a problem (bigger HDDs and a few slots free, so we can expand the raid 5). We are using raid 10 hardware raid controller with cache and sata 7200rpm disks. OK, raid 10 needs more disks, but is much faster than raid 5. Raid 5 is not very fast in my eyes. We've made tests with raid 10 and raid 5, on 4 sata 7200rpm disks, of course raid 10 was faster, but overall not very much. And you can expand raid 5 easier. Can you tell me, if you have a high Waiting on your alt-storage? thank you kind regards Martin Schmidt Regards Urban Thank you for your impressions. kr Martin Schmidt
dovecot replication (active-active) - server specs
Hello, i have some questions about the new dovecot replication and mdbox format. my company has currently 3 old dovecot 2.0.x fileserver/backend with ca. 120k mailboxes and ca. 6 TB data used. They are synchronised per drbd/corosync. Each fileserver/backend have ca. 40k mailboxes im Maildir format. Our MX server is delivering ca. 30 GB new mails per day. Two IMAP proxy server get the connections from the users. Atm. without dovecot director. We've got around 700k connections per day (imap 200k / pop3 500k) The system is getting issues because the fileserver still have old slow HDDs. Users sometime get connection timeouts, because the fileserver can not answer fast enough due to I/O waiting lag. So we want to make a new system. We desire the new system to use mdbox format ( bigger files, less I/O) and replication through dovecot replication (active/active) instead of drbd. Each fileserver should know every mailbox/user and for the time being 2 dovecot proxies for the user connections (IMAP/POP). (later after the migration from the old system to the new, dovecot director instead of proxies, for caching reasons). we've got 2 new fileservers, they have each SSD HDDs for new-storage and 7200rpm SATA HDDs on RAID 5 with 10 TB for alt-storage 32 GB RAM per Server Do you have some tips for the system? Do you believe 32 GB RAM are enough for one fileserver each and have you experience with the I/O Waiting problem with huge amounts of Data on the alt-storage? Could there be issues with the RAM, if one fileserver has a downtime, so the second one has to take over all mailboxes for a short amount of time? In general are only 2 new fileserver enough or should we think in bigger dimensions, like 4 fileserver Storage expansion in the new servers should not be a problem (bigger HDDs and a few slots free, so we can expand the raid 5). thank you kind regards Martin Schmidt
Re: dovecot replication (active-active) - server specs
On 09.10.2014 12:35, Martin Schmidt wrote: So we want to make a new system. We desire the new system to use mdbox format ( bigger files, less I/O) Be sure to enable compression when do do that move (you'd have to do pretty much the same migration again if you enable it later) as per http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib Just in case: You'll probably also want to increase mdbox_rotate_size from the default 2m to something along the lines of 10m to 100m (This also only affects new files so should be done early) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: dovecot replication (active-active) - server specs
Hi, Am 09.10.2014 12:35, schrieb Martin Schmidt: Our MX server is delivering ca. 30 GB new mails per day. Two IMAP proxy server get the connections from the users. Atm. without dovecot director. We've got around 700k connections per day (imap 200k / pop3 500k) Are this the hole connections per day? How many concurrend connections do you have at the same time on each server? So we want to make a new system. We desire the new system to use mdbox format ( bigger files, less I/O) and replication through dovecot replication (active/active) instead of drbd. I have no experience with dovecot replication (Still on our roadmap). We are currently using drbd on a 10Gbit dedicated link. Works very well for us. Each fileserver should know every mailbox/user and for the time being 2 dovecot proxies for the user connections (IMAP/POP). (later after the migration from the old system to the new, dovecot director instead of proxies, for caching reasons). As Florian said, enable zlib. This also decreases I/O, but needs a bit more of CPU. But not that much. we've got 2 new fileservers, they have each SSD HDDs for new-storage and 7200rpm SATA HDDs on RAID 5 with 10 TB for alt-storage 32 GB RAM per Server You also could move the INDEX files from mdbox to different SSDs. We are doing so with 40k accounts and 2TB user data. Index partition has only 22GB used and is increasing not very fast. Do you have some tips for the system? Do you believe 32 GB RAM are enough for one fileserver each and have you experience with the I/O Waiting problem with huge amounts of Data on the alt-storage? Could there be issues with the RAM, if one fileserver has a downtime, so the second one has to take over all mailboxes for a short amount of time? I think memory is not the problem. On IMAP/POP3 servers the main problem is I/O. But with dovecot mdbox and index files on SSD's we have no problem at the moment. In general are only 2 new fileserver enough or should we think in bigger dimensions, like 4 fileserver Storage expansion in the new servers should not be a problem (bigger HDDs and a few slots free, so we can expand the raid 5). We are using raid 10 hardware raid controller with cache and sata 7200rpm disks. OK, raid 10 needs more disks, but is much faster than raid 5. Raid 5 is not very fast in my eyes. thank you kind regards Martin Schmidt Regards Urban
