Re: [drakelist] Filters for non-ham use

2004-05-04 Thread Garey Barrell
Don -
There's strength in numbers.  Now I don't feel bad about having four!
73, Garey - K4OAH
Atlanta
Don and Diana Cunningham wrote:
And I thought I was bad with ONLY three of them and a TR5, Gary, hi hi.
73,
Don, WB5HAK
- Original Message -
From: "Gary Poland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Here here..I like the TR-7 so much I have 4 of them...HI! Thanks for
making
them possible Mike!
73, Gary
--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - subscribe drakelist in body
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


Re: [drakelist] Filters for non-ham use

2004-05-03 Thread Gary Poland

Here here..I like the TR-7 so much I have 4 of them...HI! Thanks for making
them possible Mike!

73, Gary

--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - subscribe drakelist in body
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


[drakelist] Filters for non-ham use

2004-05-03 Thread Stu Greene

Mike, there was no implication at all.  I simply wrote that since WARC 
bands became legal (17 and 12 meters and then 30 meters) I've been using my 
TR7 (TR-7A) quite happily on those bands.

There's nothing to resent.  I bought the rig in 1979 and while I was 
chasing DX I worked all there was with this transceiver and some have been 
on the WARC bands.

I asked Drake if making the alteration to transmit outside of the ham bands 
(160 through 10 meters) would damage the transceiver and the answer was "No".

And to make things really difficult I can use my L-4B, new in 1978, on the 
WARC bands simply by reducing the power somewhat.

I have a Drake station.  It's worked everything that it's heard since 1979 
and the C Line did the same before that.  No implication was made that your 
engineering is poor or that you know nothing about what you're doing.  I 
simply contributed the truth.  Drake and the transceiver get along quite 
well on WARC.

 With kindest regards
From: "Mike Elliott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 1:05 PM
Subject: [drakelist] Filters
>
> Thank you Stu - I designed those output filters for full coverage, and I
> resent the implication
> that they are faulty.
>
> Thanks again for your comments
--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - subscribe drakelist in body
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--


Re: [drakelist] Filters for non-ham use

2004-05-03 Thread Don and Diana Cunningham

And I thought I was bad with ONLY three of them and a TR5, Gary, hi hi.
73,
Don, WB5HAK

- Original Message -
From: "Gary Poland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mike Elliott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] Filters for non-ham use


>
> Here here..I like the TR-7 so much I have 4 of them...HI! Thanks for
making
> them possible Mike!
>
> 73, Gary
>
> --
> Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - subscribe drakelist in
body
> Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in
body
> Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
> Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
> --
>

--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - subscribe drakelist in body
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--