(Short?) merge window reminder

2011-05-24 Thread Alexey Zaytsev
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 00:33, Linus Torvalds
 wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar  wrote:
>>
>> I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
>> cutting 3.0.0! :-)
>
> So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0",
> not "3.0.0" - the stable team would get the third digit rather than
> the fourth one.
>
> But no, it wouldn't be for 42. Despite THHGTTG, I think "40" is a
> fairly nice round number.
>
> There's also the timing issue - since we no longer do version numbers
> based on features, but based on time, just saying "we're about to
> start the third decade" works as well as any other excuse.
>
> But we'll see.

Maybe, 2011.x, or 11.x, x increasing for every merge window started this year?
This would better reflect the steady nature of the releases, but would
certainly break a lot of scripts. ;)


Re: (Short?) merge window reminder

2011-05-24 Thread Alexey Zaytsev
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 00:33, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
 On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu wrote:

 I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
 cutting 3.0.0! :-)

 So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be 3.0,
 not 3.0.0 - the stable team would get the third digit rather than
 the fourth one.

 But no, it wouldn't be for 42. Despite THHGTTG, I think 40 is a
 fairly nice round number.

 There's also the timing issue - since we no longer do version numbers
 based on features, but based on time, just saying we're about to
 start the third decade works as well as any other excuse.

 But we'll see.

Maybe, 2011.x, or 11.x, x increasing for every merge window started this year?
This would better reflect the steady nature of the releases, but would
certainly break a lot of scripts. ;)
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel