Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Never return 0 on timeout when retiring requests
Looks very relevant to our recent hangcheck failures. Acked-by: Nirmoy Das On 11/16/2022 12:25 PM, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: Users of intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout() expect 0 return value on success. However, we have no protection from passing back 0 potentially returned by dma_fence_wait_timeout() on timeout. Replace 0 with -ETIME before using timeout as return value. Fixes: f33a8a51602c ("drm/i915: Merge wait_for_timelines with retire_request") Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v5.5+ --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c index ccaf2fd80625b..ac6b2b1861397 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c @@ -213,6 +213,9 @@ out_active: spin_lock(>lock); list_for_each_entry_safe(tl, tn, , link) __intel_timeline_free(>kref); + if (!timeout) + timeout = -ETIME; + if (flush_submission(gt, timeout)) /* Wait, there's more! */ active_count++;
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Never return 0 on timeout when retiring requests
On 16.11.2022 12:25, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: Users of intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout() expect 0 return value on success. However, we have no protection from passing back 0 potentially returned by dma_fence_wait_timeout() on timeout. Replace 0 with -ETIME before using timeout as return value. Fixes: f33a8a51602c ("drm/i915: Merge wait_for_timelines with retire_request") Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v5.5+ --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c index ccaf2fd80625b..ac6b2b1861397 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.c @@ -213,6 +213,9 @@ out_active: spin_lock(>lock); list_for_each_entry_safe(tl, tn, , link) __intel_timeline_free(>kref); + if (!timeout) + timeout = -ETIME; + Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda Regards Andrzej if (flush_submission(gt, timeout)) /* Wait, there's more! */ active_count++;