On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:19:07PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > This is rather confusing to look at as-is: > dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv); in intel_hpd_irq_handler() > handles disabling the actual HPD IRQ, while > intel_hpd_irq_storm_disable() handles moving the HPD pin state over from > MARK_DISABLED to DISABLED along with enabling polling for it.
what about also changing the name of the function? > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hotplug.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hotplug.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hotplug.c > index c11d73de16f2..e5e3eeb7e482 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hotplug.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hotplug.c > @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static void i915_hotplug_work_func(struct work_struct > *work) > hpd_event_bits = dev_priv->hotplug.event_bits; > dev_priv->hotplug.event_bits = 0; > > - /* Disable hotplug on connectors that hit an irq storm. */ > + /* Enable polling for connectors which had HPD IRQ storms */ > intel_hpd_irq_storm_disable(dev_priv); This now gets confusing to my brain... comment says "enable" function name is "disable". > > spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock); > @@ -458,6 +458,10 @@ void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private > *dev_priv, > } > } > > + /* > + * Disable any IRQs that storms were detected on. Polling enablement > + * happens later in our hotplug work. > + */ > if (storm_detected && dev_priv->display_irqs_enabled) > dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv); > spin_unlock(&dev_priv->irq_lock); > -- > 2.19.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
