Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 4/7] drm/prime: Clear drm_gem_object->dma_buf on release

2018-01-01 Thread Noralf Trønnes


Den 31.12.2017 16.41, skrev Chris Wilson:

Quoting Noralf Trønnes (2017-12-31 13:58:40)

Clear the pointer so the buffer can be re-exported. Otherwise use
after free happens in the next call to drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd().

Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes 
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
index 9a17725b0f7a..3214c0eb7466 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
@@ -343,6 +343,7 @@ void drm_gem_dmabuf_release(struct dma_buf *dma_buf)
  
 /* drop the reference on the export fd holds */

 drm_gem_object_put_unlocked(obj);
+   obj->dma_buf = NULL;

obj->dma_buf holds a reference to the dma_buf, so to get to the dma_buf
release we must have already called dma_buf_put(obj->dma_buf). See
drm_gem_object_exported_dma_buf_free(). (Note you would do the
obj->dma_buf = NULL before dropping the potentially last ref to obj.)
A BUG_ON(obj->dma_buf) may help clarify the cache was already released.


Hmm, okay it was a shot in the dark.
Maybe I can defer dumb_buffer and drm_framebuffer creation until fb_open
and then free it all in fb_close. That would align fbdev emulation more
with how DRM userspace operates. Let's see what assumptions the code has
about drm_fb_helper->fb being set on probe...

Noralf.

___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 4/7] drm/prime: Clear drm_gem_object->dma_buf on release

2017-12-31 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Noralf Trønnes (2017-12-31 13:58:40)
> Clear the pointer so the buffer can be re-exported. Otherwise use
> after free happens in the next call to drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes 
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
> index 9a17725b0f7a..3214c0eb7466 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
> @@ -343,6 +343,7 @@ void drm_gem_dmabuf_release(struct dma_buf *dma_buf)
>  
> /* drop the reference on the export fd holds */
> drm_gem_object_put_unlocked(obj);
> +   obj->dma_buf = NULL;

obj->dma_buf holds a reference to the dma_buf, so to get to the dma_buf
release we must have already called dma_buf_put(obj->dma_buf). See
drm_gem_object_exported_dma_buf_free(). (Note you would do the
obj->dma_buf = NULL before dropping the potentially last ref to obj.)
A BUG_ON(obj->dma_buf) may help clarify the cache was already released.
-Chris
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel