[PATCH] bugfix and cleanup patches in the TTM code for 3.1.
Hi Konrad, 2011/6/8 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk : > The bug-fix "ttm: Do not increment the amount of pages in a pool by the > current amount" > I never observed, but found while looking at the code. The cleanup patch: > "ttm: Fix spelling mistakes and remove unused #ifdef", I had posted earlier > and Randy > Dunlap graciously added some extra cleanups - which I have rolled in. This is safe to put comments to the patch in the following place: Signed-off-by: (...) --- RIGHT HERE --- drivers/(...) When applying such a patch comments will not be visible in git log. You may find this easier method of commenting your patches. -- Rafa?
[PATCH] bugfix and cleanup patches in the TTM code for 3.1.
> > > The bug-fix "ttm: Do not increment the amount of pages in a pool by the > > > current amount" > > > I never observed, but found while looking at the code. The cleanup patch: > > > "ttm: Fix spelling mistakes and remove unused #ifdef", I had posted > > > earlier and Randy > > > Dunlap graciously added some extra cleanups - which I have rolled in. > > > > This is safe to put comments to the patch in the following place: Ok. Thanks will do.
[PATCH] bugfix and cleanup patches in the TTM code for 3.1.
The bug-fix "ttm: Do not increment the amount of pages in a pool by the current amount" I never observed, but found while looking at the code. The cleanup patch: "ttm: Fix spelling mistakes and remove unused #ifdef", I had posted earlier and Randy Dunlap graciously added some extra cleanups - which I have rolled in.
[PATCH] bugfix and cleanup patches in the TTM code for 3.1.
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:30:22 +0200 Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: > Hi Konrad, > > 2011/6/8 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk : > > The bug-fix "ttm: Do not increment the amount of pages in a pool by the > > current amount" > > I never observed, but found while looking at the code. The cleanup patch: > > "ttm: Fix spelling mistakes and remove unused #ifdef", I had posted earlier > > and Randy > > Dunlap graciously added some extra cleanups - which I have rolled in. > > This is safe to put comments to the patch in the following place: > > > Signed-off-by: (...) > --- > RIGHT HERE > --- > drivers/(...) > > > When applying such a patch comments will not be visible in git log. > You may find this easier method of commenting your patches. Yes, it would remove the temptation to make a patch 0/ that several people are (sadly) using recently. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
Re: [PATCH] bugfix and cleanup patches in the TTM code for 3.1.
Hi Konrad, 2011/6/8 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com: The bug-fix ttm: Do not increment the amount of pages in a pool by the current amount I never observed, but found while looking at the code. The cleanup patch: ttm: Fix spelling mistakes and remove unused #ifdef, I had posted earlier and Randy Dunlap graciously added some extra cleanups - which I have rolled in. This is safe to put comments to the patch in the following place: Signed-off-by: (...) --- RIGHT HERE --- drivers/(...) When applying such a patch comments will not be visible in git log. You may find this easier method of commenting your patches. -- Rafał ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH] bugfix and cleanup patches in the TTM code for 3.1.
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:30:22 +0200 Rafał Miłecki wrote: Hi Konrad, 2011/6/8 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com: The bug-fix ttm: Do not increment the amount of pages in a pool by the current amount I never observed, but found while looking at the code. The cleanup patch: ttm: Fix spelling mistakes and remove unused #ifdef, I had posted earlier and Randy Dunlap graciously added some extra cleanups - which I have rolled in. This is safe to put comments to the patch in the following place: Signed-off-by: (...) --- RIGHT HERE --- drivers/(...) When applying such a patch comments will not be visible in git log. You may find this easier method of commenting your patches. Yes, it would remove the temptation to make a patch 0/small_number that several people are (sadly) using recently. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
