Re: [PATCH 0/5] xen: cleanup detection of non-essential pv devices

2021-11-25 Thread Boris Ostrovsky



On 11/22/21 3:20 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:

On 22.10.21 08:47, Juergen Gross wrote:

Today the non-essential pv devices are hard coded in the xenbus driver
and this list is lacking multiple entries.

This series reworks the detection logic of non-essential devices by
adding a flag for that purpose to struct xenbus_driver.

Juergen Gross (5):
   xen: add "not_essential" flag to struct xenbus_driver
   xen: flag xen_drm_front to be not essential for system boot
   xen: flag hvc_xen to be not essential for system boot
   xen: flag pvcalls-front to be not essential for system boot
   xen: flag xen_snd_front to be not essential for system boot

  drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front.c    |  1 +
  drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c  |  1 +
  drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c  |  1 +
  drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c  |  1 +
  drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c    |  1 +
  drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c | 14 +++---
  include/xen/xenbus.h   |  1 +
  sound/xen/xen_snd_front.c  |  1 +
  8 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)







Applied to for-linus-5.16c


-boris



Re: [PATCH 0/5] xen: cleanup detection of non-essential pv devices

2021-11-23 Thread Boris Ostrovsky



On 11/22/21 3:20 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:

On 22.10.21 08:47, Juergen Gross wrote:

Today the non-essential pv devices are hard coded in the xenbus driver
and this list is lacking multiple entries.

This series reworks the detection logic of non-essential devices by
adding a flag for that purpose to struct xenbus_driver.

Juergen Gross (5):
   xen: add "not_essential" flag to struct xenbus_driver
   xen: flag xen_drm_front to be not essential for system boot
   xen: flag hvc_xen to be not essential for system boot
   xen: flag pvcalls-front to be not essential for system boot
   xen: flag xen_snd_front to be not essential for system boot

  drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front.c    |  1 +
  drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c  |  1 +
  drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c  |  1 +
  drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c  |  1 +
  drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c    |  1 +
  drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c | 14 +++---
  include/xen/xenbus.h   |  1 +
  sound/xen/xen_snd_front.c  |  1 +
  8 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)



Any further comments?



Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky 


(I'll fix the semicolon typo in the last patch, no need to resend)



Re: [PATCH 0/5] xen: cleanup detection of non-essential pv devices

2021-10-22 Thread Juergen Gross

On 22.10.21 09:24, Jan Beulich wrote:

On 22.10.2021 08:47, Juergen Gross wrote:

Today the non-essential pv devices are hard coded in the xenbus driver
and this list is lacking multiple entries.

This series reworks the detection logic of non-essential devices by
adding a flag for that purpose to struct xenbus_driver.


I'm wondering whether it wouldn't better be the other way around: The
(hopefully few) essential ones get flagged, thus also making it more
prominent during patch review that a flag gets added (and justification
provided), instead of having to spot the lack of a flag getting set.


Not flagging a non-essential one is less problematic than not flagging
an essential driver IMO.

For some drivers I'm on the edge, BTW. The pv 9pfs driver ought to be
non-essential in most cases, but there might be use cases where it is
needed, so I didn't set its non_essential flag.

Same applies to pv-usb and maybe pv-scsi, while pv-tpm probably really
is essential.

With the current series I'm ending up with 6 non-essential drivers and
6 essential ones, so either way needs the same number of drivers
modified.


Juergen


OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [PATCH 0/5] xen: cleanup detection of non-essential pv devices

2021-10-22 Thread Jan Beulich
On 22.10.2021 08:47, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Today the non-essential pv devices are hard coded in the xenbus driver
> and this list is lacking multiple entries.
> 
> This series reworks the detection logic of non-essential devices by
> adding a flag for that purpose to struct xenbus_driver.

I'm wondering whether it wouldn't better be the other way around: The
(hopefully few) essential ones get flagged, thus also making it more
prominent during patch review that a flag gets added (and justification
provided), instead of having to spot the lack of a flag getting set.

Jan



[PATCH 0/5] xen: cleanup detection of non-essential pv devices

2021-10-22 Thread Juergen Gross
Today the non-essential pv devices are hard coded in the xenbus driver
and this list is lacking multiple entries.

This series reworks the detection logic of non-essential devices by
adding a flag for that purpose to struct xenbus_driver.

Juergen Gross (5):
  xen: add "not_essential" flag to struct xenbus_driver
  xen: flag xen_drm_front to be not essential for system boot
  xen: flag hvc_xen to be not essential for system boot
  xen: flag pvcalls-front to be not essential for system boot
  xen: flag xen_snd_front to be not essential for system boot

 drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front.c|  1 +
 drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c  |  1 +
 drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c  |  1 +
 drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c  |  1 +
 drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c|  1 +
 drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c | 14 +++---
 include/xen/xenbus.h   |  1 +
 sound/xen/xen_snd_front.c  |  1 +
 8 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

-- 
2.26.2