A few reasons for this:
- It's really the only one where this matters. I tried looking around,
and I didn't find any non-pci vga-compatible controllers for x86
(since that's the only platform where we had this until a few
patches ago), where a driver participating in the aperture claim
dance would interfere.
- I also don't expect that any future bus anytime soon will
not just look like pci towards the OS, that's been the case for like
25+ years by now for practically everything (even non non-x86).
- Also it's a bit funny if we have one part of the vga removal in the
pci function, and the other in the generic one.
v2: Rebase.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas
Cc: Helge Deller
Cc: linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/video/aperture.c | 15 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/aperture.c b/drivers/video/aperture.c
index 552cffdb827b..ec9387d94049 100644
--- a/drivers/video/aperture.c
+++ b/drivers/video/aperture.c
@@ -298,14 +298,6 @@ int aperture_remove_conflicting_devices(resource_size_t
base, resource_size_t si
aperture_detach_devices(base, size);
- /*
-* If this is the primary adapter, there could be a VGA device
-* that consumes the VGA framebuffer I/O range. Remove this device
-* as well.
-*/
- if (primary)
- aperture_detach_devices(VGA_FB_PHYS_BASE, VGA_FB_PHYS_SIZE);
-
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(aperture_remove_conflicting_devices);
@@ -342,6 +334,13 @@ int aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices(struct pci_dev
*pdev, const char *na
}
if (primary) {
+ /*
+* If this is the primary adapter, there could be a VGA device
+* that consumes the VGA framebuffer I/O range. Remove this
+* device as well.
+*/
+ aperture_detach_devices(VGA_FB_PHYS_BASE, VGA_FB_PHYS_SIZE);
+
/*
* WARNING: Apparently we must kick fbdev drivers before vgacon,
* otherwise the vga fbdev driver falls over.
--
2.40.0
