Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dpu: Correct dpu destroy and disable order
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 11:37:17AM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > On 11/2/2018 6:19 PM, Jayant Shekhar wrote: > > In case of msm drm bind failure, dpu_mdss_destroy is triggered. > > In this function, resources are freed and pm runtime disable is > > called, which triggers dpu_mdss_disable. Now in dpu_mdss_disable, > > driver tries to access a memory which is already freed. This > > results in kernel panic. Fix this by ensuring proper sequence > > of dpu destroy and disable calls. > > > > Changes in v2: > > - Removed double spacings [Jeykumar] > > > > Signed-off-by: Jayant Shekhar > > I was testing this patch out and in my setup I see that with this > change, during a dsi probe defer case, a dpu_mdss_enable() is called > followed by a dpu_mdss_destroy() but dpu_mdss_disable() is never called. > > This results in a mismatch in clock usecount causing the mdp clocks to > stay enabled even with display turned off. This suggests an unmatched pm_runtime_get/put. I just audited the code and nothing stuck out to me in the probe defer case, things seem to be well matched. Could you instrument the pm_runtime_* calls in msm/dpu and see if there's a _get without a _put? Sean > > localhost ~ # cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary | grep mdss > disp_cc_mdss_rscc_ahb_clk000 0 > 0 0 5 > disp_cc_mdss_axi_clk 000 0 > 0 0 5 > disp_cc_mdss_ahb_clk 000 0 > 0 0 5 >disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk_src 1101920 > 0 0 5 > disp_cc_mdss_mdp_lut_clk 0001920 > 0 0 5 > disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk1101920 > 0 0 5 >disp_cc_mdss_vsync_clk_src 0001920 >0 0 5 > > Also to note, on an older 4.14 kernel, I do not see any issue in the order in > which > these functions are called in the dsi probe defer case, i.e its an enable > followed by > a disable and then a destroy (and that's without this patch) > > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c | 5 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c > > index fd9c893..902bb4c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c > > @@ -156,18 +156,15 @@ static void dpu_mdss_destroy(struct drm_device *dev) > > struct dpu_mdss *dpu_mdss = to_dpu_mdss(priv->mdss); > > struct dss_module_power *mp = _mdss->mp; > > + pm_runtime_disable(dev->dev); > > _dpu_mdss_irq_domain_fini(dpu_mdss); > > - > > free_irq(platform_get_irq(pdev, 0), dpu_mdss); > > - > > msm_dss_put_clk(mp->clk_config, mp->num_clk); > > devm_kfree(>dev, mp->clk_config); > > if (dpu_mdss->mmio) > > devm_iounmap(>dev, dpu_mdss->mmio); > > dpu_mdss->mmio = NULL; > > - > > - pm_runtime_disable(dev->dev); > > priv->mdss = NULL; > > } > > > ___ > Freedreno mailing list > freedr...@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno -- Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dpu: Correct dpu destroy and disable order
On 11/2/2018 6:19 PM, Jayant Shekhar wrote: In case of msm drm bind failure, dpu_mdss_destroy is triggered. In this function, resources are freed and pm runtime disable is called, which triggers dpu_mdss_disable. Now in dpu_mdss_disable, driver tries to access a memory which is already freed. This results in kernel panic. Fix this by ensuring proper sequence of dpu destroy and disable calls. Changes in v2: - Removed double spacings [Jeykumar] Signed-off-by: Jayant Shekhar I was testing this patch out and in my setup I see that with this change, during a dsi probe defer case, a dpu_mdss_enable() is called followed by a dpu_mdss_destroy() but dpu_mdss_disable() is never called. This results in a mismatch in clock usecount causing the mdp clocks to stay enabled even with display turned off. localhost ~ # cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary | grep mdss disp_cc_mdss_rscc_ahb_clk000 0 0 0 5 disp_cc_mdss_axi_clk 000 0 0 0 5 disp_cc_mdss_ahb_clk 000 0 0 0 5 disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk_src 1101920 0 0 5 disp_cc_mdss_mdp_lut_clk 0001920 0 0 5 disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk1101920 0 0 5 disp_cc_mdss_vsync_clk_src 0001920 0 0 5 Also to note, on an older 4.14 kernel, I do not see any issue in the order in which these functions are called in the dsi probe defer case, i.e its an enable followed by a disable and then a destroy (and that's without this patch) --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c | 5 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c index fd9c893..902bb4c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c @@ -156,18 +156,15 @@ static void dpu_mdss_destroy(struct drm_device *dev) struct dpu_mdss *dpu_mdss = to_dpu_mdss(priv->mdss); struct dss_module_power *mp = _mdss->mp; + pm_runtime_disable(dev->dev); _dpu_mdss_irq_domain_fini(dpu_mdss); - free_irq(platform_get_irq(pdev, 0), dpu_mdss); - msm_dss_put_clk(mp->clk_config, mp->num_clk); devm_kfree(>dev, mp->clk_config); if (dpu_mdss->mmio) devm_iounmap(>dev, dpu_mdss->mmio); dpu_mdss->mmio = NULL; - - pm_runtime_disable(dev->dev); priv->mdss = NULL; } ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dpu: Correct dpu destroy and disable order
Hi, On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 5:49 AM Jayant Shekhar wrote: > > In case of msm drm bind failure, dpu_mdss_destroy is triggered. > In this function, resources are freed and pm runtime disable is > called, which triggers dpu_mdss_disable. Now in dpu_mdss_disable, > driver tries to access a memory which is already freed. This > results in kernel panic. Fix this by ensuring proper sequence > of dpu destroy and disable calls. > > Changes in v2: >- Removed double spacings [Jeykumar] > > Signed-off-by: Jayant Shekhar > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c | 5 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) I can confirm that this fixes a crash I was running into. Specifically it looked like this: --- msm_dsi ae94000.dsi: ae94000.dsi supply gdsc not found, using dummy regulator msm_dsi ae94000.dsi: Linked as a consumer to regulator.0 msm_dsi ae94000.dsi: Dropping the link to regulator.0 msm_dsi ae94000.dsi: Linked as a consumer to regulator.35 msm_dsi_manager_register: failed to register mipi dsi host for DSI 0 msm_dsi ae94000.dsi: Dropping the link to regulator.35 msm ae0.mdss: failed to bind ae94000.dsi (ops dsi_ops): -517 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 006b6b6b6b6b6b6b ... Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work ... Call trace: clk_disable+0x24/0x4c msm_dss_enable_clk+0xec/0x164 dpu_mdss_disable+0x2c/0x84 msm_runtime_suspend+0x50/0x5c pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x3c/0x48 genpd_runtime_suspend+0xf4/0x1cc __rpm_callback+0x128/0x1a4 rpm_callback+0x70/0x90 rpm_suspend+0x2f4/0x564 rpm_idle+0x3c0/0x3d8 pm_runtime_work+0x6c/0xa0 process_one_work+0x38c/0x634 worker_thread+0x218/0x360 kthread+0x130/0x138 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 --- Thus: Tested-by: Douglas Anderson > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c > index fd9c893..902bb4c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c > @@ -156,18 +156,15 @@ static void dpu_mdss_destroy(struct drm_device *dev) > struct dpu_mdss *dpu_mdss = to_dpu_mdss(priv->mdss); > struct dss_module_power *mp = _mdss->mp; > > + pm_runtime_disable(dev->dev); > _dpu_mdss_irq_domain_fini(dpu_mdss); > - > free_irq(platform_get_irq(pdev, 0), dpu_mdss); > - > msm_dss_put_clk(mp->clk_config, mp->num_clk); > devm_kfree(>dev, mp->clk_config); > > if (dpu_mdss->mmio) > devm_iounmap(>dev, dpu_mdss->mmio); > dpu_mdss->mmio = NULL; > - > - pm_runtime_disable(dev->dev); > priv->mdss = NULL; > } > > -- > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project > ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[PATCH v2] drm/msm/dpu: Correct dpu destroy and disable order
In case of msm drm bind failure, dpu_mdss_destroy is triggered. In this function, resources are freed and pm runtime disable is called, which triggers dpu_mdss_disable. Now in dpu_mdss_disable, driver tries to access a memory which is already freed. This results in kernel panic. Fix this by ensuring proper sequence of dpu destroy and disable calls. Changes in v2: - Removed double spacings [Jeykumar] Signed-off-by: Jayant Shekhar --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c | 5 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c index fd9c893..902bb4c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c @@ -156,18 +156,15 @@ static void dpu_mdss_destroy(struct drm_device *dev) struct dpu_mdss *dpu_mdss = to_dpu_mdss(priv->mdss); struct dss_module_power *mp = _mdss->mp; + pm_runtime_disable(dev->dev); _dpu_mdss_irq_domain_fini(dpu_mdss); - free_irq(platform_get_irq(pdev, 0), dpu_mdss); - msm_dss_put_clk(mp->clk_config, mp->num_clk); devm_kfree(>dev, mp->clk_config); if (dpu_mdss->mmio) devm_iounmap(>dev, dpu_mdss->mmio); dpu_mdss->mmio = NULL; - - pm_runtime_disable(dev->dev); priv->mdss = NULL; } -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dpu: Correct dpu destroy and disable order
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 06:19:17PM +0530, Jayant Shekhar wrote: > In case of msm drm bind failure, dpu_mdss_destroy is triggered. > In this function, resources are freed and pm runtime disable is > called, which triggers dpu_mdss_disable. Now in dpu_mdss_disable, > driver tries to access a memory which is already freed. This > results in kernel panic. Fix this by ensuring proper sequence > of dpu destroy and disable calls. Since you are in this specific area, I noticed we also had some memory leaks on bind "failure" and I just sent out a patch for that. Jordan -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dpu: Correct dpu destroy and disable order
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 06:19:17PM +0530, Jayant Shekhar wrote: > In case of msm drm bind failure, dpu_mdss_destroy is triggered. > In this function, resources are freed and pm runtime disable is > called, which triggers dpu_mdss_disable. Now in dpu_mdss_disable, > driver tries to access a memory which is already freed. This > results in kernel panic. Fix this by ensuring proper sequence > of dpu destroy and disable calls. > > Changes in v2: >- Removed double spacings [Jeykumar] > > Signed-off-by: Jayant Shekhar Reviewed-by: Sean Paul > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c | 5 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c > index fd9c893..902bb4c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c > @@ -156,18 +156,15 @@ static void dpu_mdss_destroy(struct drm_device *dev) > struct dpu_mdss *dpu_mdss = to_dpu_mdss(priv->mdss); > struct dss_module_power *mp = _mdss->mp; > > + pm_runtime_disable(dev->dev); > _dpu_mdss_irq_domain_fini(dpu_mdss); > - > free_irq(platform_get_irq(pdev, 0), dpu_mdss); > - > msm_dss_put_clk(mp->clk_config, mp->num_clk); > devm_kfree(>dev, mp->clk_config); > > if (dpu_mdss->mmio) > devm_iounmap(>dev, dpu_mdss->mmio); > dpu_mdss->mmio = NULL; > - > - pm_runtime_disable(dev->dev); > priv->mdss = NULL; > } > > -- > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project > -- Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
