[PATCH v2 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports.

2016-02-22 Thread Liviu Dudau
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 03:51:29PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:51:47AM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:22:04PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > Rockchip DRM driver cannot use the same compare_of() function to
> > > match ports and remote ports (aka encoders) as their OF sub-trees
> > > look different. Add a second compare function to be used when encoders
> > > are added to the component framework and patch the existing users of
> > > the function accordingly.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau 
> > 
> > Russell,
> > 
> > Resurecting this old patch from around Christmas time (bad time for patch
> > review).
> > 
> > Are you happy enough with this version to re-issue the Ack or do you think
> > I still need to work on it?
> 
> What I'd like to see is the patch reworked, because:
> 
> > > + component_match_add(dev, , compare_port, port);
> > > + /*
> > > +  * component_match_add keeps a reference to the port
> > > +  * variable, so we need to keep the reference count
> > > +  * increment from of_parse_phandle()
> > > +  */
> ...
> > > + component_match_add(dev, , compare_encoder, 
> > > remote);
> > > + /*
> > > +  * component_match_add keeps a reference to the port
> > > +  * variable, so we need to keep the reference count
> > > +  * increment from of_graph_get_remote_port_parent()
> > > +  */
> 
> This problem no longer exists.

Fair enough, I will send a v3 version.

Thanks,
Liviu

> 
> -- 
> RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
> according to speedtest.net.
> 

-- 

| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---
¯\_(ツ)_/¯


[PATCH v2 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports.

2016-02-22 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:51:47AM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:22:04PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > Rockchip DRM driver cannot use the same compare_of() function to
> > match ports and remote ports (aka encoders) as their OF sub-trees
> > look different. Add a second compare function to be used when encoders
> > are added to the component framework and patch the existing users of
> > the function accordingly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau 
> 
> Russell,
> 
> Resurecting this old patch from around Christmas time (bad time for patch
> review).
> 
> Are you happy enough with this version to re-issue the Ack or do you think
> I still need to work on it?

What I'd like to see is the patch reworked, because:

> > +   component_match_add(dev, , compare_port, port);
> > +   /*
> > +* component_match_add keeps a reference to the port
> > +* variable, so we need to keep the reference count
> > +* increment from of_parse_phandle()
> > +*/
...
> > +   component_match_add(dev, , compare_encoder, 
> > remote);
> > +   /*
> > +* component_match_add keeps a reference to the port
> > +* variable, so we need to keep the reference count
> > +* increment from of_graph_get_remote_port_parent()
> > +*/

This problem no longer exists.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.


[PATCH v2 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports.

2016-02-22 Thread Liviu Dudau
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:22:04PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> Rockchip DRM driver cannot use the same compare_of() function to
> match ports and remote ports (aka encoders) as their OF sub-trees
> look different. Add a second compare function to be used when encoders
> are added to the component framework and patch the existing users of
> the function accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau 

Russell,

Resurecting this old patch from around Christmas time (bad time for patch 
review).

Are you happy enough with this version to re-issue the Ack or do you think I 
still
need to work on it?

Best regards,
Liviu

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c |  3 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c| 19 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c  |  3 ++-
>  include/drm/drm_of.h|  6 --
>  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c
> index 77ab93d..3a2a929 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c
> @@ -274,7 +274,8 @@ static int armada_drm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   struct device *dev = >dev;
>   int ret;
>  
> - ret = drm_of_component_probe(dev, compare_dev_name, _master_ops);
> + ret = drm_of_component_probe(dev, compare_dev_name, compare_dev_name,
> +  _master_ops);
>   if (ret != -EINVAL)
>   return ret;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> index 493c05c..34589d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_of_find_possible_crtcs);
>   * Returns zero if successful, or one of the standard error codes if it 
> fails.
>   */
>  int drm_of_component_probe(struct device *dev,
> -int (*compare_of)(struct device *, void *),
> +int (*compare_port)(struct device *, void *),
> +int (*compare_encoder)(struct device *, void *),
>  const struct component_master_ops *m_ops)
>  {
>   struct device_node *ep, *port, *remote;
> @@ -101,8 +102,12 @@ int drm_of_component_probe(struct device *dev,
>   continue;
>   }
>  
> - component_match_add(dev, , compare_of, port);
> - of_node_put(port);
> + component_match_add(dev, , compare_port, port);
> + /*
> +  * component_match_add keeps a reference to the port
> +  * variable, so we need to keep the reference count
> +  * increment from of_parse_phandle()
> +  */
>   }
>  
>   if (i == 0) {
> @@ -140,8 +145,12 @@ int drm_of_component_probe(struct device *dev,
>   continue;
>   }
>  
> - component_match_add(dev, , compare_of, remote);
> - of_node_put(remote);
> + component_match_add(dev, , compare_encoder, 
> remote);
> + /*
> +  * component_match_add keeps a reference to the port
> +  * variable, so we need to keep the reference count
> +  * increment from of_graph_get_remote_port_parent()
> +  */
>   }
>   of_node_put(port);
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
> index 64f16ea..0d36410 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
> @@ -531,7 +531,8 @@ static const struct component_master_ops imx_drm_ops = {
>  
>  static int imx_drm_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> - int ret = drm_of_component_probe(>dev, compare_of, _drm_ops);
> + int ret = drm_of_component_probe(>dev, compare_of, compare_of,
> +  _drm_ops);
>  
>   if (!ret)
>   ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(>dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_of.h b/include/drm/drm_of.h
> index 8544665..1c29e42 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_of.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_of.h
> @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ struct device_node;
>  extern uint32_t drm_of_find_possible_crtcs(struct drm_device *dev,
>  struct device_node *port);
>  extern int drm_of_component_probe(struct device *dev,
> -   int (*compare_of)(struct device *, void *),
> +   int (*compare_port)(struct device *, void *),
> +   int (*compare_encoder)(struct device *, void 
> *),
> const struct component_master_ops *m_ops);
>  #else
>  static inline uint32_t drm_of_find_possible_crtcs(struct drm_device *dev,
> @@ -21,7 +22,8 @@ static inline uint32_t drm_of_find_possible_crtcs(struct 
> drm_device *dev,
>  

[PATCH v2 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports.

2015-11-20 Thread Liviu Dudau
Rockchip DRM driver cannot use the same compare_of() function to
match ports and remote ports (aka encoders) as their OF sub-trees
look different. Add a second compare function to be used when encoders
are added to the component framework and patch the existing users of
the function accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c| 19 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c  |  3 ++-
 include/drm/drm_of.h|  6 --
 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c
index 77ab93d..3a2a929 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c
@@ -274,7 +274,8 @@ static int armada_drm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct device *dev = >dev;
int ret;

-   ret = drm_of_component_probe(dev, compare_dev_name, _master_ops);
+   ret = drm_of_component_probe(dev, compare_dev_name, compare_dev_name,
+_master_ops);
if (ret != -EINVAL)
return ret;

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
index 493c05c..34589d3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
@@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_of_find_possible_crtcs);
  * Returns zero if successful, or one of the standard error codes if it fails.
  */
 int drm_of_component_probe(struct device *dev,
-  int (*compare_of)(struct device *, void *),
+  int (*compare_port)(struct device *, void *),
+  int (*compare_encoder)(struct device *, void *),
   const struct component_master_ops *m_ops)
 {
struct device_node *ep, *port, *remote;
@@ -101,8 +102,12 @@ int drm_of_component_probe(struct device *dev,
continue;
}

-   component_match_add(dev, , compare_of, port);
-   of_node_put(port);
+   component_match_add(dev, , compare_port, port);
+   /*
+* component_match_add keeps a reference to the port
+* variable, so we need to keep the reference count
+* increment from of_parse_phandle()
+*/
}

if (i == 0) {
@@ -140,8 +145,12 @@ int drm_of_component_probe(struct device *dev,
continue;
}

-   component_match_add(dev, , compare_of, remote);
-   of_node_put(remote);
+   component_match_add(dev, , compare_encoder, 
remote);
+   /*
+* component_match_add keeps a reference to the port
+* variable, so we need to keep the reference count
+* increment from of_graph_get_remote_port_parent()
+*/
}
of_node_put(port);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
index 64f16ea..0d36410 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-drm-core.c
@@ -531,7 +531,8 @@ static const struct component_master_ops imx_drm_ops = {

 static int imx_drm_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-   int ret = drm_of_component_probe(>dev, compare_of, _drm_ops);
+   int ret = drm_of_component_probe(>dev, compare_of, compare_of,
+_drm_ops);

if (!ret)
ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(>dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_of.h b/include/drm/drm_of.h
index 8544665..1c29e42 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_of.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_of.h
@@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ struct device_node;
 extern uint32_t drm_of_find_possible_crtcs(struct drm_device *dev,
   struct device_node *port);
 extern int drm_of_component_probe(struct device *dev,
- int (*compare_of)(struct device *, void *),
+ int (*compare_port)(struct device *, void *),
+ int (*compare_encoder)(struct device *, void 
*),
  const struct component_master_ops *m_ops);
 #else
 static inline uint32_t drm_of_find_possible_crtcs(struct drm_device *dev,
@@ -21,7 +22,8 @@ static inline uint32_t drm_of_find_possible_crtcs(struct 
drm_device *dev,

 static inline int
 drm_of_component_probe(struct device *dev,
-  int (*compare_of)(struct device *, void *),
+  int (*compare_port)(struct device *, void *),
+  int (*compare_encoder)(struct device *, void *),
   const struct component_master_ops *m_ops)
 {
return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.6.2