[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: restore backlight precision when converting from opregion

2014-05-15 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 12 May 2014, Aaron Lu  wrote:
> On 05/04/2014 03:22 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> 32b * 32b = 32b
>> 
>> n = (u64)level * freq; to avoid overflow as you claim.
>
> Updated patch to fix this problem is here, thanks!

Pushed to -fixes with Chris' IRC r-b, thanks for the patch and review.

BR,
Jani.



>
>
> From a0f41a92d949c814c203672ff7efe219a90ca6df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Aaron Lu 
> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:02:52 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: restore backlight precision when converting from
>  ACPI
>
> When we set backlight on behalf of ACPI opregion, we will convert the
> backlight value in the 0-255 range defined in opregion to the actual
> hardware level. Commit 22505b82a2 (drm/i915: avoid brightness overflow
> when doing scale) is meant to fix the overflow problem when doing the
> conversion, but it also caused a problem that the converted hardware
> level doesn't quite represent the intended value: say user wants maximum
> backlight level(255 in opregion's range), then we will calculate the
> actual hardware level to be: level = freq / max * level, where freq is
> the hardware's max backlight level(937 on an user's box), and max and
> level are all 255. The converted value should be 937 but the above
> calculation will yield 765.
>
> To fix this issue, just use 64 bits to do the calculation to keep the
> precision and avoid overflow at the same time.
>
> Buglink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72491
> Reported-by: Nico Schottelius 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu 
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c | 8 
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> index 0eead16aeda7..cb8cfb7e0974 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> @@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ void intel_panel_set_backlight(struct intel_connector 
> *connector, u32 level,
>   enum pipe pipe = intel_get_pipe_from_connector(connector);
>   u32 freq;
>   unsigned long flags;
> + u64 n;
>  
>   if (!panel->backlight.present || pipe == INVALID_PIPE)
>   return;
> @@ -502,10 +503,9 @@ void intel_panel_set_backlight(struct intel_connector 
> *connector, u32 level,
>  
>   /* scale to hardware max, but be careful to not overflow */
>   freq = panel->backlight.max;
> - if (freq < max)
> - level = level * freq / max;
> - else
> - level = freq / max * level;
> + n = (u64)level * freq;
> + do_div(n, max);
> + level = n;
>  
>   panel->backlight.level = level;
>   if (panel->backlight.device)
> -- 
> 1.9.0
>
> ___
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center


[PATCH v3] drm/i915: restore backlight precision when converting from opregion

2014-05-12 Thread Aaron Lu
On 05/04/2014 03:22 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> 32b * 32b = 32b
> 
> n = (u64)level * freq; to avoid overflow as you claim.

Updated patch to fix this problem is here, thanks!


>From a0f41a92d949c814c203672ff7efe219a90ca6df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Lu 
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:02:52 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: restore backlight precision when converting from
 ACPI

When we set backlight on behalf of ACPI opregion, we will convert the
backlight value in the 0-255 range defined in opregion to the actual
hardware level. Commit 22505b82a2 (drm/i915: avoid brightness overflow
when doing scale) is meant to fix the overflow problem when doing the
conversion, but it also caused a problem that the converted hardware
level doesn't quite represent the intended value: say user wants maximum
backlight level(255 in opregion's range), then we will calculate the
actual hardware level to be: level = freq / max * level, where freq is
the hardware's max backlight level(937 on an user's box), and max and
level are all 255. The converted value should be 937 but the above
calculation will yield 765.

To fix this issue, just use 64 bits to do the calculation to keep the
precision and avoid overflow at the same time.

Buglink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72491
Reported-by: Nico Schottelius 
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c | 8 
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
index 0eead16aeda7..cb8cfb7e0974 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
@@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ void intel_panel_set_backlight(struct intel_connector 
*connector, u32 level,
enum pipe pipe = intel_get_pipe_from_connector(connector);
u32 freq;
unsigned long flags;
+   u64 n;

if (!panel->backlight.present || pipe == INVALID_PIPE)
return;
@@ -502,10 +503,9 @@ void intel_panel_set_backlight(struct intel_connector 
*connector, u32 level,

/* scale to hardware max, but be careful to not overflow */
freq = panel->backlight.max;
-   if (freq < max)
-   level = level * freq / max;
-   else
-   level = freq / max * level;
+   n = (u64)level * freq;
+   do_div(n, max);
+   level = n;

panel->backlight.level = level;
if (panel->backlight.device)
-- 
1.9.0