Hi,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 10:18 AM Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> This is the 2nd four patches from my RFC series ("drm/dp: Improvements
> for DP AUX channel") [1]. I've broken the series in two so we can make
> progress on the two halves separately.
>
> v2 of this series changes to add wait_hpd_asserted() instead of
> is_hpd_asserted(). This allows us to move the extra delay needed for
> ps8640 into the ps8640 driver itself.
>
> The idea for this series came up during the review process of
> Sankeerth's series trying to add eDP for Qualcomm SoCs [2].
>
> This _doesn't_ attempt to fix the Analogix driver. If this works out,
> ideally someone can post a patch up to do that.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220409023628.2104952-1-diand...@chromium.org/
> [2]
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/1648656179-10347-2-git-send-email-quic_sbill...@quicinc.com/
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Don't check "hpd_asserted" boolean when unset.
> - Handle errors from gpiod_get_value_cansleep() properly.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Change is_hpd_asserted() to wait_hpd_asserted()
>
> Douglas Anderson (4):
> drm/dp: Add wait_hpd_asserted() callback to struct drm_dp_aux
> drm/panel-edp: Take advantage of wait_hpd_asserted() in struct
> drm_dp_aux
> drm/panel: atna33xc20: Take advantage of wait_hpd_asserted() in struct
> drm_dp_aux
> drm/bridge: parade-ps8640: Provide wait_hpd_asserted() in struct
> drm_dp_aux
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c| 34 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c | 33 ++-
> .../gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-atna33xc20.c | 41 +--
> include/drm/dp/drm_dp_helper.h| 26
> 4 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
It's been about 2 weeks and I haven't seen any review. Dmitry: since
this came up due to your feedback, any chance you'd be willing to
review at least the drm-framework pieces? Philip is no longer on the
Chrome OS team, so I suspect he won't be reviewing the ps8640 patches.
Stephen: maybe you'd be willing to?
Thanks!
-Doug
