Re: [PATCH v3 05/12] PCI: Detect root port of internal USB4 devices by `usb4-host-interface`

2022-02-17 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:56:58PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 09:52:02AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 09:34:26AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 03:45:46PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > My expectation is that "USB" (like "PCI" and "PCIe") tells me
> > > > something about how a device is electrically connected and how
> > > > software can operate it.  It doesn't really tell me anything about
> > > > whether those electrical connections are permanent, made through an
> > > > internal slot, or made through an external connector and cable.
> > > 
> > > It is used to identify "tunneled" ports (whether PCIe, USB 3.x or
> > > DisplayPort). Tunnels are created by software (in Linux it is the
> > > Thunderbolt driver) and are dynamic in nature. The USB4 links go over
> > > USB Type-C cable which also is something user can plug/unplug freely.
> > > 
> > > I would say it is reasonable expectation that anything behind these
> > > ports can be assumed as "removable".
> > 
> > USB gadgets may be soldered to the mainboard.  Those cannot be
> > unplugged freely.  It is common practice to solder USB Ethernet
> > or USB FTDI serial ports and nothing's preventing a vendor to solder
> > USB4/Thunderbolt gadgets.
> 
> Right, that's why I say it is "reasonable expectation" that anything
> behind these ports can be assumed "removable" :) Of course they don't
> have to be but if we assume that in the driver where this actually
> matters we should be on the safe side, no?

Spec citations help maintain things over the long term.  Reasonable
expectations that are part of today's folklore but are not written
down and shared leads to things that work today but not tomorrow.

Bjorn


Re: [PATCH v3 05/12] PCI: Detect root port of internal USB4 devices by `usb4-host-interface`

2022-02-14 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 01:11:05PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > It is used to identify "tunneled" ports (whether PCIe, USB 3.x or
> > > DisplayPort). Tunnels are created by software (in Linux it is the
> > > Thunderbolt driver) and are dynamic in nature. The USB4 links go over
> > > USB Type-C cable which also is something user can plug/unplug freely.
> > > 
> > > I would say it is reasonable expectation that anything behind these
> > > ports can be assumed as "removable".
> > 
> > USB gadgets may be soldered to the mainboard.  Those cannot be
> > unplugged freely.  It is common practice to solder USB Ethernet
> > or USB FTDI serial ports and nothing's preventing a vendor to solder
> > USB4/Thunderbolt gadgets.
> 
> Right, that's why I say it is "reasonable expectation" that anything
> behind these ports can be assumed "removable" :) Of course they don't
> have to be but if we assume that in the driver where this actually
> matters we should be on the safe side, no?

Also the tunnels are not permanent anyway.


Re: [PATCH v3 05/12] PCI: Detect root port of internal USB4 devices by `usb4-host-interface`

2022-02-14 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 09:52:02AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 09:34:26AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 03:45:46PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > My expectation is that "USB" (like "PCI" and "PCIe") tells me
> > > something about how a device is electrically connected and how
> > > software can operate it.  It doesn't really tell me anything about
> > > whether those electrical connections are permanent, made through an
> > > internal slot, or made through an external connector and cable.
> > 
> > It is used to identify "tunneled" ports (whether PCIe, USB 3.x or
> > DisplayPort). Tunnels are created by software (in Linux it is the
> > Thunderbolt driver) and are dynamic in nature. The USB4 links go over
> > USB Type-C cable which also is something user can plug/unplug freely.
> > 
> > I would say it is reasonable expectation that anything behind these
> > ports can be assumed as "removable".
> 
> USB gadgets may be soldered to the mainboard.  Those cannot be
> unplugged freely.  It is common practice to solder USB Ethernet
> or USB FTDI serial ports and nothing's preventing a vendor to solder
> USB4/Thunderbolt gadgets.

Right, that's why I say it is "reasonable expectation" that anything
behind these ports can be assumed "removable" :) Of course they don't
have to be but if we assume that in the driver where this actually
matters we should be on the safe side, no?


Re: [PATCH v3 05/12] PCI: Detect root port of internal USB4 devices by `usb4-host-interface`

2022-02-14 Thread Lukas Wunner
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 09:34:26AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 03:45:46PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > My expectation is that "USB" (like "PCI" and "PCIe") tells me
> > something about how a device is electrically connected and how
> > software can operate it.  It doesn't really tell me anything about
> > whether those electrical connections are permanent, made through an
> > internal slot, or made through an external connector and cable.
> 
> It is used to identify "tunneled" ports (whether PCIe, USB 3.x or
> DisplayPort). Tunnels are created by software (in Linux it is the
> Thunderbolt driver) and are dynamic in nature. The USB4 links go over
> USB Type-C cable which also is something user can plug/unplug freely.
> 
> I would say it is reasonable expectation that anything behind these
> ports can be assumed as "removable".

USB gadgets may be soldered to the mainboard.  Those cannot be
unplugged freely.  It is common practice to solder USB Ethernet
or USB FTDI serial ports and nothing's preventing a vendor to solder
USB4/Thunderbolt gadgets.


Re: [PATCH v3 05/12] PCI: Detect root port of internal USB4 devices by `usb4-host-interface`

2022-02-13 Thread Mika Westerberg
Hi Bjorn,

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 03:45:46PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 01:32:43PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > The root port used for PCIe tunneling should be marked as removable to
> > ensure that the entire chain is marked removable.
> > 
> > This can be done by looking for the device property specified in
> > the ACPI tables `usb4-host-interface`.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Mika Westerberg 
> > Link: 
> > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/pci/dsd-for-pcie-root-ports#mapping-native-protocols-pcie-displayport-tunneled-through-usb4-to-usb4-host-routers
> > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello 
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 10 ++
> >  drivers/pci/pci.h  |  5 +
> >  drivers/pci/probe.c|  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> > index a42dbf448860..6368e5633b1b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> > @@ -1391,6 +1391,16 @@ void pci_acpi_cleanup(struct device *dev, struct 
> > acpi_device *adev)
> > }
> >  }
> >  
> > +bool pci_acpi_is_usb4(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > +   struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(>dev);
> > +
> > +   if (!adev)
> > +   return false;
> > +   return fwnode_property_present(acpi_fwnode_handle(adev),
> > +  "usb4-host-interface");
> 
> Maybe it's obvious to everybody but me that "USB4" means this device
> is removable.  The Microsoft reference above doesn't say anything
> about removability.
> 
> My expectation is that "USB" (like "PCI" and "PCIe") tells me
> something about how a device is electrically connected and how
> software can operate it.  It doesn't really tell me anything about
> whether those electrical connections are permanent, made through an
> internal slot, or made through an external connector and cable.

It is used to identify "tunneled" ports (whether PCIe, USB 3.x or
DisplayPort). Tunnels are created by software (in Linux it is the
Thunderbolt driver) and are dynamic in nature. The USB4 links go over
USB Type-C cable which also is something user can plug/unplug freely.

I would say it is reasonable expectation that anything behind these
ports can be assumed as "removable".


Re: [PATCH v3 05/12] PCI: Detect root port of internal USB4 devices by `usb4-host-interface`

2022-02-11 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 01:32:43PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> The root port used for PCIe tunneling should be marked as removable to
> ensure that the entire chain is marked removable.
> 
> This can be done by looking for the device property specified in
> the ACPI tables `usb4-host-interface`.
> 
> Suggested-by: Mika Westerberg 
> Link: 
> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/pci/dsd-for-pcie-root-ports#mapping-native-protocols-pcie-displayport-tunneled-through-usb4-to-usb4-host-routers
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello 
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 10 ++
>  drivers/pci/pci.h  |  5 +
>  drivers/pci/probe.c|  1 +
>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> index a42dbf448860..6368e5633b1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> @@ -1391,6 +1391,16 @@ void pci_acpi_cleanup(struct device *dev, struct 
> acpi_device *adev)
>   }
>  }
>  
> +bool pci_acpi_is_usb4(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(>dev);
> +
> + if (!adev)
> + return false;
> + return fwnode_property_present(acpi_fwnode_handle(adev),
> +"usb4-host-interface");

Maybe it's obvious to everybody but me that "USB4" means this device
is removable.  The Microsoft reference above doesn't say anything
about removability.

My expectation is that "USB" (like "PCI" and "PCIe") tells me
something about how a device is electrically connected and how
software can operate it.  It doesn't really tell me anything about
whether those electrical connections are permanent, made through an
internal slot, or made through an external connector and cable.

> +}
> +
>  static struct fwnode_handle *(*pci_msi_get_fwnode_cb)(struct device *dev);
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> index 3d60cabde1a1..359607c0542d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ void acpi_pci_refresh_power_state(struct pci_dev *dev);
>  int acpi_pci_wakeup(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable);
>  bool acpi_pci_need_resume(struct pci_dev *dev);
>  pci_power_t acpi_pci_choose_state(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> +bool pci_acpi_is_usb4(struct pci_dev *dev);
>  #else
>  static inline int pci_dev_acpi_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, bool probe)
>  {
> @@ -734,6 +735,10 @@ static inline pci_power_t acpi_pci_choose_state(struct 
> pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>   return PCI_POWER_ERROR;
>  }
> +static inline bool pci_acpi_is_usb4(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index e41656cdd8f0..2693211d31cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1610,6 +1610,7 @@ static void pci_set_removable(struct pci_dev *dev)
>* exposed as "removable" to userspace.
>*/
>   if (vsec ||
> + pci_acpi_is_usb4(dev) ||
>   (parent &&
>   (parent->external_facing || dev_is_removable(>dev
>   dev_set_removable(>dev, DEVICE_REMOVABLE);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 


[PATCH v3 05/12] PCI: Detect root port of internal USB4 devices by `usb4-host-interface`

2022-02-11 Thread Mario Limonciello
The root port used for PCIe tunneling should be marked as removable to
ensure that the entire chain is marked removable.

This can be done by looking for the device property specified in
the ACPI tables `usb4-host-interface`.

Suggested-by: Mika Westerberg 
Link: 
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/pci/dsd-for-pcie-root-ports#mapping-native-protocols-pcie-displayport-tunneled-through-usb4-to-usb4-host-routers
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello 
---
 drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 10 ++
 drivers/pci/pci.h  |  5 +
 drivers/pci/probe.c|  1 +
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
index a42dbf448860..6368e5633b1b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
@@ -1391,6 +1391,16 @@ void pci_acpi_cleanup(struct device *dev, struct 
acpi_device *adev)
}
 }
 
+bool pci_acpi_is_usb4(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+   struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(>dev);
+
+   if (!adev)
+   return false;
+   return fwnode_property_present(acpi_fwnode_handle(adev),
+  "usb4-host-interface");
+}
+
 static struct fwnode_handle *(*pci_msi_get_fwnode_cb)(struct device *dev);
 
 /**
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index 3d60cabde1a1..359607c0542d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ void acpi_pci_refresh_power_state(struct pci_dev *dev);
 int acpi_pci_wakeup(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable);
 bool acpi_pci_need_resume(struct pci_dev *dev);
 pci_power_t acpi_pci_choose_state(struct pci_dev *pdev);
+bool pci_acpi_is_usb4(struct pci_dev *dev);
 #else
 static inline int pci_dev_acpi_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, bool probe)
 {
@@ -734,6 +735,10 @@ static inline pci_power_t acpi_pci_choose_state(struct 
pci_dev *pdev)
 {
return PCI_POWER_ERROR;
 }
+static inline bool pci_acpi_is_usb4(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+   return false;
+}
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index e41656cdd8f0..2693211d31cf 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -1610,6 +1610,7 @@ static void pci_set_removable(struct pci_dev *dev)
 * exposed as "removable" to userspace.
 */
if (vsec ||
+   pci_acpi_is_usb4(dev) ||
(parent &&
(parent->external_facing || dev_is_removable(>dev
dev_set_removable(>dev, DEVICE_REMOVABLE);
-- 
2.34.1