In ed07718ae7ba ("libdrm: intel/Android.mk: Filter libdrm_intel
library requirements on x86/x86_64"), I avoided including the
logic from intel/Android.mk on non-x86 based builds.

This was done to avoid the inclusion of the libpciaccess library
as a build requirement. As a side effect, it removed the
libdrm_intel target. This then caused trouble on non-x86 builds
that use mesa3d, as its Android.mk files include the libdrm_intel
as a build target.

So instead of removing everything, this patch fixes the previous
change to just remove the libpciaccess library as a build
dependency on non-x86 builds.

Validated on both hikey960 (no mesa3d) and db410c (with mesa3d)
builds.

Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herr...@linaro.org>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanp...@google.com>
Cc: Robert Foss <robert.f...@collabora.com>
Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tf...@google.com>
Cc: Marissa Wall <maris...@google.com>
Cc: Dan Willemsen <dwillem...@google.com>
Fixes: ed07718ae7ba ("libdrm: intel/Android.mk: Filter
       libdrm_intel library requirements on x86/x86_64")
Reported-by: Stefan Schake <stsch...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org>
---
 intel/Android.mk | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/intel/Android.mk b/intel/Android.mk
index 3f9db78..5e144f8 100644
--- a/intel/Android.mk
+++ b/intel/Android.mk
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
 # IN THE SOFTWARE.
 #
 
-ifeq ($(TARGET_ARCH),$(filter $(TARGET_ARCH),x86 x86_64))
 LOCAL_PATH := $(call my-dir)
 include $(CLEAR_VARS)
 
@@ -33,9 +32,12 @@ LOCAL_MODULE := libdrm_intel
 LOCAL_SRC_FILES := $(LIBDRM_INTEL_FILES)
 
 LOCAL_SHARED_LIBRARIES := \
-       libdrm \
+       libdrm
+
+ifeq ($(TARGET_ARCH),$(filter $(TARGET_ARCH),x86 x86_64))
+  LOCAL_SHARED_LIBRARIES += \
        libpciaccess
+endif
 
 include $(LIBDRM_COMMON_MK)
 include $(BUILD_SHARED_LIBRARY)
-endif
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to