RE: [PATCH 6/7] drm/ttm: add ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable to check bo is allowable to evict or swapout

2017-12-24 Thread He, Roger
-Original Message-
From: dri-devel [mailto:dri-devel-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of 
Thomas Hellstrom
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 3:51 PM
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/ttm: add ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable to check 
bo is allowable to evict or swapout

On 12/20/2017 11:35 AM, Roger He wrote:
> extract this function since eviction and swapout share same logic

But it's only used in eviction?

Yes, currently it only used in eviction. And will be used in Swapout.

>
> Change-Id: I80a475a93fceed8d66d74a1832c815a0756341ac
> Signed-off-by: Roger He 
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 29 +++--
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index e7595b4..313925c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> @@ -706,6 +706,23 @@ bool ttm_bo_eviction_valuable(struct ttm_buffer_object 
> *bo,
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_eviction_valuable);
>   
> +static bool ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> + struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx, bool *locked)

Could we have a description in the code what this function actually 
does? admittedly it checks whether a swapout or eviction is allowable, 
but it aso performs a recursive tryreserve(), and that is of value to any 
future code reader.?

Ok.

Thanks
Roger(Hongbo.He)

/Thomas


> +{
> + bool ret = false;
> +
> + *locked = false;
> + if (bo->resv == ctx->resv) {
> + if (ctx->allow_reserved_eviction || !list_empty(>ddestroy))
> + ret = true;
> + } else {
> + *locked = reservation_object_trylock(bo->resv);
> + ret = *locked;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
>   static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>  uint32_t mem_type,
>  const struct ttm_place *place, @@ -721,21 
> +738,13 @@ 
> static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>   spin_lock(>lru_lock);
>   for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i) {
>   list_for_each_entry(bo, >lru[i], lru) {
> - if (bo->resv == ctx->resv) {
> - if (!ctx->allow_reserved_eviction &&
> - list_empty(>ddestroy))
> - continue;
> - } else {
> - locked = reservation_object_trylock(bo->resv);
> - if (!locked)
> - continue;
> - }
> + if (!ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(bo, ctx, ))
> + continue;
>   
>   if (place && !bdev->driver->eviction_valuable(bo,
> place)) {
>   if (locked)
>   reservation_object_unlock(bo->resv);
> - locked = false;
>   continue;
>   }
>   break;


___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/ttm: add ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable to check bo is allowable to evict or swapout

2017-12-20 Thread Thomas Hellstrom

On 12/20/2017 11:35 AM, Roger He wrote:

extract this function since eviction and swapout share same logic


But it's only used in eviction?



Change-Id: I80a475a93fceed8d66d74a1832c815a0756341ac
Signed-off-by: Roger He 
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 29 +++--
  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index e7595b4..313925c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -706,6 +706,23 @@ bool ttm_bo_eviction_valuable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_eviction_valuable);
  
+static bool ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,

+   struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx, bool *locked)


Could we have a description in the code what this function actually 
does? admittedly

it checks whether a swapout or eviction is allowable, but it aso performs a
recursive tryreserve(), and that is of value to any future code reader.?

/Thomas



+{
+   bool ret = false;
+
+   *locked = false;
+   if (bo->resv == ctx->resv) {
+   if (ctx->allow_reserved_eviction || !list_empty(>ddestroy))
+   ret = true;
+   } else {
+   *locked = reservation_object_trylock(bo->resv);
+   ret = *locked;
+   }
+
+   return ret;
+}
+
  static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
   uint32_t mem_type,
   const struct ttm_place *place,
@@ -721,21 +738,13 @@ static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
spin_lock(>lru_lock);
for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i) {
list_for_each_entry(bo, >lru[i], lru) {
-   if (bo->resv == ctx->resv) {
-   if (!ctx->allow_reserved_eviction &&
-   list_empty(>ddestroy))
-   continue;
-   } else {
-   locked = reservation_object_trylock(bo->resv);
-   if (!locked)
-   continue;
-   }
+   if (!ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(bo, ctx, ))
+   continue;
  
  			if (place && !bdev->driver->eviction_valuable(bo,

  place)) {
if (locked)
reservation_object_unlock(bo->resv);
-   locked = false;
continue;
}
break;



___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel