On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:00:46PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 11-01-17 om 17:13 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:29:43PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> If the crtc was brought up with audio before the driver loads,
> >> then crtc_disable will remove a refcount to audio that doesn't exist
> >> before.
> >>
> >> Fortunately we already set power domains on readout, so we can just add
> >> the power domain handling to get_crtc_power_domains, which will update
> >> the power domains correctly in all cases.
> >>
> >> This was found when testing module reload on CI with the crtc enabled,
> >> which resulted in the following warn after module reload + modeset:
> >>
> >> [ 24.197041] [ cut here ]
> >> [ 24.197075] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 99 at
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c:1790
> >> intel_display_power_put+0x134/0x140 [i915]
> >> [ 24.197076] Use count on domain AUDIO is already zero
> >> [ 24.197098] CPU: 0 PID: 99 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted
> >> 4.9.0-CI-Trybot_393+ #1
> >> [ 24.197099] Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS
> >> SYSKLi35.86A.0042.2016.0409.1246 04/09/2016
> >> [ 24.197102] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> >> [ 24.197105] c93c7688 81435b35 c93c76d8
> >>
> >> [ 24.197107] c93c76c8 8107e4d6 06fe5dc36f28
> >> 88025dc30054
> >> [ 24.197109] 88025dc36f28 88025dc3 88025dc3
> >> 0015
> >> [ 24.197110] Call Trace:
> >> [ 24.197113] [] dump_stack+0x67/0x92
> >> [ 24.197116] [] __warn+0xc6/0xe0
> >> [ 24.197118] [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4a/0x50
> >> [ 24.197149] [] intel_display_power_put+0x134/0x140
> >> [i915]
> >> [ 24.197187] [] intel_disable_ddi+0x4d/0x80 [i915]
> >> [ 24.197223] []
> >> intel_encoders_disable.isra.74+0x7f/0x90 [i915]
> >> [ 24.197257] [] haswell_crtc_disable+0x55/0x170 [i915]
> >> [ 24.197292] [] intel_atomic_commit_tail+0x108/0xfd0
> >> [i915]
> >> [ 24.197295] [] ? __lock_is_held+0x66/0x90
> >> [ 24.197330] [] intel_atomic_commit+0x429/0x560 [i915]
> >> [ 24.197332] []
> >> ?drm_atomic_add_affected_connectors+0x56/0xf0
> >> [ 24.197334] [] drm_atomic_commit+0x46/0x50
> >> [ 24.197336] [] restore_fbdev_mode+0x147/0x270
> >> [ 24.197337] []
> >> drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x2e/0x70
> >> [ 24.197339] [] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x28/0x50
> >> [ 24.197374] [] intel_fbdev_set_par+0x13/0x70 [i915]
> >> [ 24.197376] [] fbcon_init+0x57a/0x600
> >> [ 24.197379] [] visual_init+0xd1/0x130
> >> [ 24.197381] [] do_bind_con_driver+0x1bc/0x3a0
> >> [ 24.197384] [] do_take_over_console+0x111/0x180
> >> [ 24.197386] [] do_fbcon_takeover+0x52/0xb0
> >> [ 24.197387] [] fbcon_event_notify+0x723/0x850
> >> [ 24.197390] []
> >> ?__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x30/0x70
> >> [ 24.197392] [] notifier_call_chain+0x34/0xa0
> >> [ 24.197394] []
> >> __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x70
> >> [ 24.197397] [] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x20
> >> [ 24.197398] [] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
> >> [ 24.197400] [] register_framebuffer+0x24c/0x330
> >> [ 24.197402] []
> >> drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x219/0x3c0
> >> [ 24.197436] [] intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x13/0x30
> >> [i915]
> >> [ 24.197438] [] async_run_entry_fn+0x34/0x140
> >> [ 24.197440] [] process_one_work+0x1ec/0x6b0
> >> [ 24.197442] [] ? process_one_work+0x166/0x6b0
> >> [ 24.197445] [] worker_thread+0x49/0x490
> >> [ 24.197447] [] ? process_one_work+0x6b0/0x6b0
> >> [ 24.197448] [] kthread+0xeb/0x110
> >> [ 24.197451] [] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
> >> [ 24.197453] [] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40
> >> [ 24.197476] ---[ end trace bda64b683b8e8162 ]---
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
> > Do we still need this with patch 3? I know it'd be nice if we could
> > faithfully restore any state we can also program, but then that's also a
> > lot of complexity ...
> >
> > Otoh patch 3 means we'll stop testing a lot of the fastboot code while
> > reloading the driver. But then that's been the thing in the past, and as
> > long as we still boot up we have at least some test coverage fo the
> > fastboot code (I'm mostly concerned about the plane/buffer readout code,
> > since that's not covered by the state checker).
> >
> > But for now I'd say let's just go with patch 3 only.
> We don't need this patch, but it makes the audio power domain tracked
> like all other power domains. It's a nice cleanup in general and I would
> like it even without the rest of the series. Could otherwise be merged
> through the intel tree through.
Hm, count me convinced.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
___
dri-devel mailing list