Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: allocate large structures dynamically
On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 08:42 +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 06.05.20 um 21:01 schrieb Joe Perches: [] > > And trivia: > > > > The !! uses with bool seem unnecessary and it's probably better > > to make amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled to return bool. [] > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c [] > > @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static int __amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct > > amdgpu_device *adev, > > */ > > if (!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(adev, head)) > > return 0; > > - if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head))) > > + if (!(enable ^ amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head))) > > And while we are at improving coding style I think that writing this as > "if (enabled == amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head))" would be > much more readable. that's decidedly true... ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: allocate large structures dynamically
Am 06.05.20 um 21:01 schrieb Joe Perches:
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 16:01 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
After the structure was padded to 1024 bytes, it is no longer
suitable for being a local variable, as the function surpasses
the warning limit for 32-bit architectures:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:587:5: error: stack frame size of 1072
bytes in function 'amdgpu_ras_feature_enable' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
^
Use kzalloc() instead to get it from the heap.
[]
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
[]
@@ -588,19 +588,23 @@ int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
struct ras_common_if *head, bool enable)
{
struct amdgpu_ras *con = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
- union ta_ras_cmd_input info;
+ union ta_ras_cmd_input *info;
int ret;
if (!con)
return -EINVAL;
+info = kzalloc(sizeof(union ta_ras_cmd_input), GFP_KERNEL);
Spaces were used for indentation here not a tab.
It might be useful to run your proposed patches through checkpatch
Is this an actual bug fix as the previous use didn't
zero unused info members?
+ if (!info)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
if (!enable) {
- info.disable_features = (struct ta_ras_disable_features_input) {
+ info->disable_features = (struct ta_ras_disable_features_input)
{
.block_id = amdgpu_ras_block_to_ta(head->block),
.error_type = amdgpu_ras_error_to_ta(head->type),
};
} else {
- info.enable_features = (struct ta_ras_enable_features_input) {
+ info->enable_features = (struct ta_ras_enable_features_input) {
.block_id = amdgpu_ras_block_to_ta(head->block),
.error_type = amdgpu_ras_error_to_ta(head->type),
};
@@ -609,26 +613,33 @@ int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
/* Do not enable if it is not allowed. */
WARN_ON(enable && !amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(adev, head));
/* Are we alerady in that state we are going to set? */
- if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
- return 0;
+ if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head))) {
And trivia:
The !! uses with bool seem unnecessary and it's probably better
to make amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled to return bool.
Maybe something like:
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
index 538895cfd862..05c4eaf0ddfa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
@@ -526,16 +526,16 @@ void amdgpu_ras_parse_status_code(struct amdgpu_device*
adev,
}
/* feature ctl begin */
-static int amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
- struct ras_common_if *head)
+static bool amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
+ struct ras_common_if *head)
{
struct amdgpu_ras *con = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
return con->hw_supported & BIT(head->block);
}
-static int amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
- struct ras_common_if *head)
+static bool amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
+ struct ras_common_if *head)
{
struct amdgpu_ras *con = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static int __amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
*/
if (!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(adev, head))
return 0;
- if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
+ if (!(enable ^ amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
And while we are at improving coding style I think that writing this as
"if (enabled == amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head))" would be
much more readable.
Christian.
return 0;
if (enable) {
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
/* Do not enable if it is not allowed. */
WARN_ON(enable && !amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(adev, head));
/* Are we alerady in that state we are going to set? */
- if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
+ if (!(enable ^ amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
return 0;
if (!amdgpu_ras_intr_triggered()) {
___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
___
Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: allocate large structures dynamically
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 16:01 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> After the structure was padded to 1024 bytes, it is no longer
> suitable for being a local variable, as the function surpasses
> the warning limit for 32-bit architectures:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:587:5: error: stack frame size of
> 1072 bytes in function 'amdgpu_ras_feature_enable'
> [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
> int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> ^
>
> Use kzalloc() instead to get it from the heap.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
[]
> @@ -588,19 +588,23 @@ int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device
> *adev,
> struct ras_common_if *head, bool enable)
> {
> struct amdgpu_ras *con = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
> - union ta_ras_cmd_input info;
> + union ta_ras_cmd_input *info;
> int ret;
>
> if (!con)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> +info = kzalloc(sizeof(union ta_ras_cmd_input), GFP_KERNEL);
Spaces were used for indentation here not a tab.
It might be useful to run your proposed patches through checkpatch
Is this an actual bug fix as the previous use didn't
zero unused info members?
> + if (!info)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> if (!enable) {
> - info.disable_features = (struct ta_ras_disable_features_input) {
> + info->disable_features = (struct ta_ras_disable_features_input)
> {
> .block_id = amdgpu_ras_block_to_ta(head->block),
> .error_type = amdgpu_ras_error_to_ta(head->type),
> };
> } else {
> - info.enable_features = (struct ta_ras_enable_features_input) {
> + info->enable_features = (struct ta_ras_enable_features_input) {
> .block_id = amdgpu_ras_block_to_ta(head->block),
> .error_type = amdgpu_ras_error_to_ta(head->type),
> };
> @@ -609,26 +613,33 @@ int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device
> *adev,
> /* Do not enable if it is not allowed. */
> WARN_ON(enable && !amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(adev, head));
> /* Are we alerady in that state we are going to set? */
> - if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
> - return 0;
> + if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head))) {
And trivia:
The !! uses with bool seem unnecessary and it's probably better
to make amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled to return bool.
Maybe something like:
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
index 538895cfd862..05c4eaf0ddfa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
@@ -526,16 +526,16 @@ void amdgpu_ras_parse_status_code(struct amdgpu_device*
adev,
}
/* feature ctl begin */
-static int amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
- struct ras_common_if *head)
+static bool amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
+ struct ras_common_if *head)
{
struct amdgpu_ras *con = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
return con->hw_supported & BIT(head->block);
}
-static int amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
- struct ras_common_if *head)
+static bool amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
+ struct ras_common_if *head)
{
struct amdgpu_ras *con = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static int __amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device
*adev,
*/
if (!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(adev, head))
return 0;
- if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
+ if (!(enable ^ amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
return 0;
if (enable) {
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
/* Do not enable if it is not allowed. */
WARN_ON(enable && !amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(adev, head));
/* Are we alerady in that state we are going to set? */
- if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
+ if (!(enable ^ amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
return 0;
if (!amdgpu_ras_intr_triggered()) {
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: allocate large structures dynamically
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:07 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 05.05.20 um 16:01 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > After the structure was padded to 1024 bytes, it is no longer
> > suitable for being a local variable, as the function surpasses
> > the warning limit for 32-bit architectures:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:587:5: error: stack frame size of
> > 1072 bytes in function 'amdgpu_ras_feature_enable'
> > [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> > ^
> >
> > Use kzalloc() instead to get it from the heap.
> >
> > Fixes: a0d254820f43 ("drm/amdgpu: update RAS TA to Host interface")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
>
> Acked-by: Christian König
Applied. Thanks!
Alex
>
> We have a bunch of those warnings in the DAL code as well.
>
> Christian.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 31 +
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> > index 538895cfd862..7348619253c7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> > @@ -588,19 +588,23 @@ int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device
> > *adev,
> > struct ras_common_if *head, bool enable)
> > {
> > struct amdgpu_ras *con = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
> > - union ta_ras_cmd_input info;
> > + union ta_ras_cmd_input *info;
> > int ret;
> >
> > if (!con)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > +info = kzalloc(sizeof(union ta_ras_cmd_input), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!info)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > if (!enable) {
> > - info.disable_features = (struct
> > ta_ras_disable_features_input) {
> > + info->disable_features = (struct
> > ta_ras_disable_features_input) {
> > .block_id = amdgpu_ras_block_to_ta(head->block),
> > .error_type = amdgpu_ras_error_to_ta(head->type),
> > };
> > } else {
> > - info.enable_features = (struct ta_ras_enable_features_input) {
> > + info->enable_features = (struct ta_ras_enable_features_input)
> > {
> > .block_id = amdgpu_ras_block_to_ta(head->block),
> > .error_type = amdgpu_ras_error_to_ta(head->type),
> > };
> > @@ -609,26 +613,33 @@ int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device
> > *adev,
> > /* Do not enable if it is not allowed. */
> > WARN_ON(enable && !amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(adev, head));
> > /* Are we alerady in that state we are going to set? */
> > - if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
> > - return 0;
> > + if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head))) {
> > + ret = 0;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> >
> > if (!amdgpu_ras_intr_triggered()) {
> > - ret = psp_ras_enable_features(>psp, , enable);
> > + ret = psp_ras_enable_features(>psp, info, enable);
> > if (ret) {
> > amdgpu_ras_parse_status_code(adev,
> >enable ?
> > "enable":"disable",
> >
> > ras_block_str(head->block),
> > (enum ta_ras_status)ret);
> > if (ret == TA_RAS_STATUS__RESET_NEEDED)
> > - return -EAGAIN;
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + ret = -EAGAIN;
> > + else
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + goto out;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > /* setup the obj */
> > __amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(adev, head, enable);
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > + ret = 0;
> > +out:
> > + kfree(info);
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > /* Only used in device probe stage and called only once. */
>
> ___
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: allocate large structures dynamically
Am 05.05.20 um 16:01 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
After the structure was padded to 1024 bytes, it is no longer
suitable for being a local variable, as the function surpasses
the warning limit for 32-bit architectures:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:587:5: error: stack frame size of 1072
bytes in function 'amdgpu_ras_feature_enable' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
^
Use kzalloc() instead to get it from the heap.
Fixes: a0d254820f43 ("drm/amdgpu: update RAS TA to Host interface")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
Acked-by: Christian König
We have a bunch of those warnings in the DAL code as well.
Christian.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 31 +
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
index 538895cfd862..7348619253c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
@@ -588,19 +588,23 @@ int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
struct ras_common_if *head, bool enable)
{
struct amdgpu_ras *con = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
- union ta_ras_cmd_input info;
+ union ta_ras_cmd_input *info;
int ret;
if (!con)
return -EINVAL;
+info = kzalloc(sizeof(union ta_ras_cmd_input), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!info)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
if (!enable) {
- info.disable_features = (struct ta_ras_disable_features_input) {
+ info->disable_features = (struct ta_ras_disable_features_input)
{
.block_id = amdgpu_ras_block_to_ta(head->block),
.error_type = amdgpu_ras_error_to_ta(head->type),
};
} else {
- info.enable_features = (struct ta_ras_enable_features_input) {
+ info->enable_features = (struct ta_ras_enable_features_input) {
.block_id = amdgpu_ras_block_to_ta(head->block),
.error_type = amdgpu_ras_error_to_ta(head->type),
};
@@ -609,26 +613,33 @@ int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
/* Do not enable if it is not allowed. */
WARN_ON(enable && !amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(adev, head));
/* Are we alerady in that state we are going to set? */
- if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
- return 0;
+ if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head))) {
+ ret = 0;
+ goto out;
+ }
if (!amdgpu_ras_intr_triggered()) {
- ret = psp_ras_enable_features(>psp, , enable);
+ ret = psp_ras_enable_features(>psp, info, enable);
if (ret) {
amdgpu_ras_parse_status_code(adev,
enable ?
"enable":"disable",
ras_block_str(head->block),
(enum ta_ras_status)ret);
if (ret == TA_RAS_STATUS__RESET_NEEDED)
- return -EAGAIN;
- return -EINVAL;
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
+ else
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+
+ goto out;
}
}
/* setup the obj */
__amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(adev, head, enable);
-
- return 0;
+ ret = 0;
+out:
+ kfree(info);
+ return ret;
}
/* Only used in device probe stage and called only once. */
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
