Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] dt-bindings: net: brcm,unimac-mdio: Add asp-v2.0
On 5/22/23 11:17, Conor Dooley wrote: On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:19:39PM -0700, Justin Chen wrote: > The ASP 2.0 Ethernet controller uses a brcm unimac. > > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli > Signed-off-by: Justin Chen > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml > index 0be426ee1e44..6684810fcbf0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml > @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ properties: > - brcm,genet-mdio-v3 > - brcm,genet-mdio-v4 > - brcm,genet-mdio-v5 > + - brcm,asp-v2.0-mdio > + - brcm,asp-v2.1-mdio > - brcm,unimac-mdio From V(N-1), there was some discussion between Rob & Florian: > > How many SoCs does each of these correspond to? SoC specific compatibles > > are preferred to version numbers (because few vendors are disciplined > > at versioning and also not changing versions with every Soc). > > So far there is a 1:1 mapping between the number of versions and the > number of SoCs, and the older SoC uses v2.0, while the newer one uses v2.1. Rob's not around right now, but I don't really get why if there is a 1:1 mapping you don't just name these things after the SoCs? There is a 1:1 mapping now, but in the future there may be more SoCs with a given implemented version. This is especially true for the MDIO controller which has been largely unchanged since it was introduced. Also, my mailer **refused** to let me reply to you because of something to do with a garbage S/MIME signature? Dunno wtf is happening there. Our SMTP server is configured to automatically wrap the message in a S/MIME envelope, nothing invalid though AFAICT. What's your email client? -- Florian smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] dt-bindings: net: brcm,unimac-mdio: Add asp-v2.0
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:25:54AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 5/22/23 11:17, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:19:39PM -0700, Justin Chen wrote: > > > The ASP 2.0 Ethernet controller uses a brcm unimac. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli > > > Signed-off-by: Justin Chen > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml > > > index 0be426ee1e44..6684810fcbf0 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml > > > @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ properties: > > > - brcm,genet-mdio-v3 > > > - brcm,genet-mdio-v4 > > > - brcm,genet-mdio-v5 > > > + - brcm,asp-v2.0-mdio > > > + - brcm,asp-v2.1-mdio > > > - brcm,unimac-mdio > > > > > > From V(N-1), there was some discussion between Rob & Florian: > > > > How many SoCs does each of these correspond to? SoC specific > > compatibles > > > > are preferred to version numbers (because few vendors are disciplined > > > > at versioning and also not changing versions with every Soc). > > > > > > So far there is a 1:1 mapping between the number of versions and the > > > number of SoCs, and the older SoC uses v2.0, while the newer one uses > > v2.1. > > > > Rob's not around right now, but I don't really get why if there is a 1:1 > > mapping you don't just name these things after the SoCs? > > There is a 1:1 mapping now, but in the future there may be more SoCs with a > given implemented version. This is especially true for the MDIO controller > which has been largely unchanged since it was introduced. Figured that'd be it, but what was written in the previous thread made the opposite appear true! Acked-by: Conor Dooley > > Also, my mailer **refused** to let me reply to you because of something > > to do with a garbage S/MIME signature? Dunno wtf is happening there. > > Our SMTP server is configured to automatically wrap the message in a S/MIME > envelope, nothing invalid though AFAICT. What's your email client? Mutt - I guess it was user-error because getting S/MIME stuff auto-populated the security field on my end. Annoying but w/e...
Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] dt-bindings: net: brcm,unimac-mdio: Add asp-v2.0
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:19:39PM -0700, Justin Chen wrote: > The ASP 2.0 Ethernet controller uses a brcm unimac. > > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli > Signed-off-by: Justin Chen > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml > index 0be426ee1e44..6684810fcbf0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml > @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ properties: >- brcm,genet-mdio-v3 >- brcm,genet-mdio-v4 >- brcm,genet-mdio-v5 > + - brcm,asp-v2.0-mdio > + - brcm,asp-v2.1-mdio >- brcm,unimac-mdio From V(N-1), there was some discussion between Rob & Florian: > > How many SoCs does each of these correspond to? SoC specific compatibles > > are preferred to version numbers (because few vendors are disciplined > > at versioning and also not changing versions with every Soc). > > So far there is a 1:1 mapping between the number of versions and the > number of SoCs, and the older SoC uses v2.0, while the newer one uses v2.1. Rob's not around right now, but I don't really get why if there is a 1:1 mapping you don't just name these things after the SoCs? Also, my mailer **refused** to let me reply to you because of something to do with a garbage S/MIME signature? Dunno wtf is happening there. Cheers, Conor.
