Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dma-buf: Add ioctl to query mmap coherency/cache info

2022-09-08 Thread Christian König

Am 07.09.22 um 18:43 schrieb Daniel Vetter:

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 06:50:54PM +0200, Christian König wrote:

Am 16.08.22 um 16:26 schrieb Rob Clark:

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 1:27 AM Christian König
 wrote:

Am 15.08.22 um 23:15 schrieb Rob Clark:

From: Rob Clark 

This is a fairly narrowly focused interface, providing a way for a VMM
in userspace to tell the guest kernel what pgprot settings to use when
mapping a buffer to guest userspace.

For buffers that get mapped into guest userspace, virglrenderer returns
a dma-buf fd to the VMM (crosvm or qemu).  In addition to mapping the
pages into the guest VM, it needs to report to drm/virtio in the guest
the cache settings to use for guest userspace.  In particular, on some
architectures, creating aliased mappings with different cache attributes
is frowned upon, so it is important that the guest mappings have the
same cache attributes as any potential host mappings.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark 
---
v2: Combine with coherency, as that is a related concept.. and it is
   relevant to the VMM whether coherent access without the SYNC ioctl
   is possible; set map_info at export time to make it more clear
   that it applies for the lifetime of the dma-buf (for any mmap
   created via the dma-buf)

Well, exactly that's a conceptual NAK from my side.

The caching information can change at any time. For CPU mappings even
without further notice from the exporter.

You should look before you criticize, as I left you a way out.. the
idea was that DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT should indicate that the buffer
cannot be mapped to the guest.  We could ofc add more DMA_BUF_MAP_*
values if something else would suit you better.  But the goal is to
give the VMM enough information to dtrt, or return an error if mapping
to guest is not possible.  That seems better than assuming mapping to
guest will work and guessing about cache attrs

Well I'm not rejecting the implementation, I'm rejecting this from the
conceptual point of view.

We intentional gave the exporter full control over the CPU mappings. This
approach here breaks that now.

I haven't seen the full detailed reason why we should do that and to be
honest KVM seems to mess with things it is not supposed to touch.

For example the page reference count of mappings marked with VM_IO is a
complete no-go. This is a very strong evidence that this was based on rather
dangerous halve knowledge about the background of the handling here.

Wut?


Yep, that was also my initial reaction.


KVM grabs page references of VM_IO vma? I thought the issue was that we
still had some bo/dma-buf vma that didn't set either VM_IO or VM_PFNMAP,
and not that kvm was just outright breaking every core mm contract there
is.

Is this really what's going on in that other thread about "fixing" ttm?


At least it seems so. I haven't looked at the actual KVM code in detail, 
but from what I've seen it looks like KVM implements similar 
functionality to GUP to figure out which struct page a virtual address 
points to, but without the correct checks GUP does.


I absolutely don't understand either the why and what. Especially for 
the user case of KVM grabbing a page reference doesn't seem to make any 
sense.


My suspicion is that this should have been an MMU notifier instead, but 
this is really just a gut feeling. Maybe there is a good reason KVM 
grabs this reference.


Christian.


-Daniel


So as long as I don't see a full explanation why KVM is grabbing reference
to pages while faulting them and why we manually need to forward the caching
while the hardware documentation indicates otherwise I will be rejecting
this whole approach.

Regards,
Christian.


BR,
-R


If the hardware can't use the caching information from the host CPU page
tables directly then that pretty much completely breaks the concept that
the exporter is responsible for setting up those page tables.

Regards,
Christian.


drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c| 63 +++--
include/linux/dma-buf.h  | 11 ++
include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 68 
3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 32f55640890c..262c4706f721 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -125,6 +125,32 @@ static struct file_system_type dma_buf_fs_type = {
.kill_sb = kill_anon_super,
};

+static int __dma_buf_mmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ /* check if buffer supports mmap */
+ if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = dmabuf->ops->mmap(dmabuf, vma);
+
+ /*
+  * If the exporter claims to support coherent access, ensure the
+  * pgprot flags match the claim.
+  */
+ if ((dmabuf->map_info != DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT) && !ret) {
+ pgprot_t wc_prot = pgprot_writecombine(vma->vm_page_prot);
+ if 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dma-buf: Add ioctl to query mmap coherency/cache info

2022-09-07 Thread Rob Clark
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 9:55 AM Daniel Vetter  wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 08:01:53AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 7:54 AM Christian König
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 18.08.22 um 16:25 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 4:21 AM Christian König
> > > >  wrote:
> > > >> Am 17.08.22 um 15:44 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > > >>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:57 AM Christian König
> > > >>>  wrote:
> > >  [SNIP]
> > > 
> > >  The resulting cache attrs from combination of S1 and S2 translation
> > >  can differ.  So ideally we setup the S2 pgtables in guest aligned 
> > >  with
> > >  host userspace mappings
> > >  Well exactly that is not very convincing.
> > > 
> > >  What you want to do is to use one channel for the address and a
> > >  different one for the cache attrs, that's not something I would
> > >  recommend doing in general.
> > > >>> How would that work.. mmap() is the channel for the address, we'd need
> > > >>> to introduce a new syscall that returned additional information?
> > > >> The channel for the address is not mmap(), but rather the page faults.
> > > >> mmap() is just the function setting up that channel.
> > > >>
> > > >> The page faults then insert both the address as well as the caching
> > > >> attributes (at least on x86).
> > > > This is true on arm64 as well, but only in the S1 tables (which I
> > > > would have to assume is the case on x86 as well)
> > > >
> > > >> That we then need to forward the caching attributes manually once more
> > > >> seems really misplaced.
> > > >>
> > >  Instead the client pgtables should be setup in a way so that host can
> > >  overwrite them.
> > > >>> How?  That is completely not how VMs work.  Even if the host knew
> > > >>> where the pgtables were and somehow magically knew the various guest
> > > >>> userspace VAs, it would be racey.
> > > >> Well you mentioned that the client page tables can be setup in a way
> > > >> that the host page tables determine what caching to use. As far as I 
> > > >> can
> > > >> see this is what we should use here.
> > > > On arm64/aarch64, they *can*.. but the system (on some versions of
> > > > armv8) can also be configured to let S2 determine the attributes.  And
> > > > apparently there are benefits to this (avoids unnecessary cache
> > > > flushing in the host, AFAIU.)  This is the case where we need this new
> > > > api.
> > > >
> > > > IMO it is fine for the exporter to return a value indicating that the
> > > > attributes change dynamically or that S1 attributes must somehow be
> > > > used by the hw.  This would at least let the VMM return an error in
> > > > cases where S1 attrs cannot be relied on.  But there are enough
> > > > exporters where the cache attrs are static for the life of the buffer.
> > > > So even if you need to return DMA_BUF_MAP_I_DONT_KNOW, maybe that is
> > > > fine (if x86 can always rely on S1 attrs), or at least will let the
> > > > VMM return an error rather than just blindly assuming things will
> > > > work.
> > > >
> > > > But it makes no sense to reject the whole idea just because of some
> > > > exporters (which may not even need this).  There is always room to let
> > > > them return a map-info value that describes the situation or
> > > > limitations to the VMM.
> > >
> > > Well it does make sense as far as I can see.
> > >
> > > This is a very specific workaround for a platform problem which only
> > > matters there, but increases complexity for everybody.
> >
> > I'm not sure how this adds complexity for everybody.. or at least the
> > intention was the default value for the new enum is the same as
> > current status-quo, so no need to plumb something thru every single
> > exporter.
>
> I think what König freaks out about here, and I think it's the same
> concern I have, is that this is for _all_ dma-buf exporter.
>
> Yeah I know we're having this "anything might not be implemented" escape
> hatch, but we're also slowly working to get that fixed and make dma-buf
> implementations. And so adding a fully generic dma-buf ioctl which is very
> limited use for arm64 VM in funky configuration (where the guest controls
> caching mode in ptes fully). The usual way we do these very special things
> are:

I'm not sure that it is necessarily arm64 specific (or rather I guess
there are additional archs where virtualization works)..

But this isn't *only* solving caching modes, it is also letting the
dmabuf exporter indicate to userspace when it shouldn't even try to
map to guest (ie. cases where you really do require the SYNC ioctl),
which seems useful.

> - Importer upcasts the dma-buf to the exporters buffer type by checking
>   the ops structure pointer.

The "importer" in this case is userspace ;-)

> - There is no dma-buf interface anymore really, and you can do very
>   specific stuff like xgmi mappings, or virtio uuid, or whatever.
>
> I think this should also work like that. Which means the 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dma-buf: Add ioctl to query mmap coherency/cache info

2022-09-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 08:01:53AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 7:54 AM Christian König
>  wrote:
> >
> > Am 18.08.22 um 16:25 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 4:21 AM Christian König
> > >  wrote:
> > >> Am 17.08.22 um 15:44 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > >>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:57 AM Christian König
> > >>>  wrote:
> >  [SNIP]
> > 
> >  The resulting cache attrs from combination of S1 and S2 translation
> >  can differ.  So ideally we setup the S2 pgtables in guest aligned with
> >  host userspace mappings
> >  Well exactly that is not very convincing.
> > 
> >  What you want to do is to use one channel for the address and a
> >  different one for the cache attrs, that's not something I would
> >  recommend doing in general.
> > >>> How would that work.. mmap() is the channel for the address, we'd need
> > >>> to introduce a new syscall that returned additional information?
> > >> The channel for the address is not mmap(), but rather the page faults.
> > >> mmap() is just the function setting up that channel.
> > >>
> > >> The page faults then insert both the address as well as the caching
> > >> attributes (at least on x86).
> > > This is true on arm64 as well, but only in the S1 tables (which I
> > > would have to assume is the case on x86 as well)
> > >
> > >> That we then need to forward the caching attributes manually once more
> > >> seems really misplaced.
> > >>
> >  Instead the client pgtables should be setup in a way so that host can
> >  overwrite them.
> > >>> How?  That is completely not how VMs work.  Even if the host knew
> > >>> where the pgtables were and somehow magically knew the various guest
> > >>> userspace VAs, it would be racey.
> > >> Well you mentioned that the client page tables can be setup in a way
> > >> that the host page tables determine what caching to use. As far as I can
> > >> see this is what we should use here.
> > > On arm64/aarch64, they *can*.. but the system (on some versions of
> > > armv8) can also be configured to let S2 determine the attributes.  And
> > > apparently there are benefits to this (avoids unnecessary cache
> > > flushing in the host, AFAIU.)  This is the case where we need this new
> > > api.
> > >
> > > IMO it is fine for the exporter to return a value indicating that the
> > > attributes change dynamically or that S1 attributes must somehow be
> > > used by the hw.  This would at least let the VMM return an error in
> > > cases where S1 attrs cannot be relied on.  But there are enough
> > > exporters where the cache attrs are static for the life of the buffer.
> > > So even if you need to return DMA_BUF_MAP_I_DONT_KNOW, maybe that is
> > > fine (if x86 can always rely on S1 attrs), or at least will let the
> > > VMM return an error rather than just blindly assuming things will
> > > work.
> > >
> > > But it makes no sense to reject the whole idea just because of some
> > > exporters (which may not even need this).  There is always room to let
> > > them return a map-info value that describes the situation or
> > > limitations to the VMM.
> >
> > Well it does make sense as far as I can see.
> >
> > This is a very specific workaround for a platform problem which only
> > matters there, but increases complexity for everybody.
> 
> I'm not sure how this adds complexity for everybody.. or at least the
> intention was the default value for the new enum is the same as
> current status-quo, so no need to plumb something thru every single
> exporter.

I think what König freaks out about here, and I think it's the same
concern I have, is that this is for _all_ dma-buf exporter.

Yeah I know we're having this "anything might not be implemented" escape
hatch, but we're also slowly working to get that fixed and make dma-buf
implementations. And so adding a fully generic dma-buf ioctl which is very
limited use for arm64 VM in funky configuration (where the guest controls
caching mode in ptes fully). The usual way we do these very special things
are:

- Importer upcasts the dma-buf to the exporters buffer type by checking
  the ops structure pointer.
- There is no dma-buf interface anymore really, and you can do very
  specific stuff like xgmi mappings, or virtio uuid, or whatever.

I think this should also work like that. Which means the query ioctl
should be on some kvm/vm specific interface most likely, and not on
generic dma-buf.

Also if we add this interface somewhere in the kvm world then that would
also be a natural place to implement stuff like "the guest can't actually
overwrite caching modes, ignore this all" and anything else. Ideally this
thing exists only where it's actually needed, i.e. this specific vm+arm64
cases. Not anywhere else, because experience says that if dma-buf can be
abused in some way, people will.

Also I'd really like to understand the full flow here too, some vague
hand-waving that "apparently it has some cache flushing benefits" is a bit
too 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dma-buf: Add ioctl to query mmap coherency/cache info

2022-09-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 06:50:54PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 16.08.22 um 16:26 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 1:27 AM Christian König
> >  wrote:
> > > Am 15.08.22 um 23:15 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > > > From: Rob Clark 
> > > > 
> > > > This is a fairly narrowly focused interface, providing a way for a VMM
> > > > in userspace to tell the guest kernel what pgprot settings to use when
> > > > mapping a buffer to guest userspace.
> > > > 
> > > > For buffers that get mapped into guest userspace, virglrenderer returns
> > > > a dma-buf fd to the VMM (crosvm or qemu).  In addition to mapping the
> > > > pages into the guest VM, it needs to report to drm/virtio in the guest
> > > > the cache settings to use for guest userspace.  In particular, on some
> > > > architectures, creating aliased mappings with different cache attributes
> > > > is frowned upon, so it is important that the guest mappings have the
> > > > same cache attributes as any potential host mappings.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark 
> > > > ---
> > > > v2: Combine with coherency, as that is a related concept.. and it is
> > > >   relevant to the VMM whether coherent access without the SYNC ioctl
> > > >   is possible; set map_info at export time to make it more clear
> > > >   that it applies for the lifetime of the dma-buf (for any mmap
> > > >   created via the dma-buf)
> > > Well, exactly that's a conceptual NAK from my side.
> > > 
> > > The caching information can change at any time. For CPU mappings even
> > > without further notice from the exporter.
> > You should look before you criticize, as I left you a way out.. the
> > idea was that DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT should indicate that the buffer
> > cannot be mapped to the guest.  We could ofc add more DMA_BUF_MAP_*
> > values if something else would suit you better.  But the goal is to
> > give the VMM enough information to dtrt, or return an error if mapping
> > to guest is not possible.  That seems better than assuming mapping to
> > guest will work and guessing about cache attrs
> 
> Well I'm not rejecting the implementation, I'm rejecting this from the
> conceptual point of view.
> 
> We intentional gave the exporter full control over the CPU mappings. This
> approach here breaks that now.
> 
> I haven't seen the full detailed reason why we should do that and to be
> honest KVM seems to mess with things it is not supposed to touch.
> 
> For example the page reference count of mappings marked with VM_IO is a
> complete no-go. This is a very strong evidence that this was based on rather
> dangerous halve knowledge about the background of the handling here.

Wut?

KVM grabs page references of VM_IO vma? I thought the issue was that we
still had some bo/dma-buf vma that didn't set either VM_IO or VM_PFNMAP,
and not that kvm was just outright breaking every core mm contract there
is.

Is this really what's going on in that other thread about "fixing" ttm?
-Daniel

> So as long as I don't see a full explanation why KVM is grabbing reference
> to pages while faulting them and why we manually need to forward the caching
> while the hardware documentation indicates otherwise I will be rejecting
> this whole approach.
> 
> Regards,
> Christian.
> 
> > 
> > BR,
> > -R
> > 
> > > If the hardware can't use the caching information from the host CPU page
> > > tables directly then that pretty much completely breaks the concept that
> > > the exporter is responsible for setting up those page tables.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Christian.
> > > 
> > > >drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c| 63 +++--
> > > >include/linux/dma-buf.h  | 11 ++
> > > >include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 68 
> > > > 
> > > >3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > > > index 32f55640890c..262c4706f721 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > > > @@ -125,6 +125,32 @@ static struct file_system_type dma_buf_fs_type = {
> > > >.kill_sb = kill_anon_super,
> > > >};
> > > > 
> > > > +static int __dma_buf_mmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct 
> > > > vm_area_struct *vma)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* check if buffer supports mmap */
> > > > + if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = dmabuf->ops->mmap(dmabuf, vma);
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > +  * If the exporter claims to support coherent access, ensure the
> > > > +  * pgprot flags match the claim.
> > > > +  */
> > > > + if ((dmabuf->map_info != DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT) && !ret) {
> > > > + pgprot_t wc_prot = pgprot_writecombine(vma->vm_page_prot);
> > > > + if (dmabuf->map_info == DMA_BUF_COHERENT_WC) {
> > > > + 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dma-buf: Add ioctl to query mmap coherency/cache info

2022-08-18 Thread Rob Clark
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 7:54 AM Christian König
 wrote:
>
> Am 18.08.22 um 16:25 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 4:21 AM Christian König
> >  wrote:
> >> Am 17.08.22 um 15:44 schrieb Rob Clark:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:57 AM Christian König
> >>>  wrote:
>  [SNIP]
> 
>  The resulting cache attrs from combination of S1 and S2 translation
>  can differ.  So ideally we setup the S2 pgtables in guest aligned with
>  host userspace mappings
>  Well exactly that is not very convincing.
> 
>  What you want to do is to use one channel for the address and a
>  different one for the cache attrs, that's not something I would
>  recommend doing in general.
> >>> How would that work.. mmap() is the channel for the address, we'd need
> >>> to introduce a new syscall that returned additional information?
> >> The channel for the address is not mmap(), but rather the page faults.
> >> mmap() is just the function setting up that channel.
> >>
> >> The page faults then insert both the address as well as the caching
> >> attributes (at least on x86).
> > This is true on arm64 as well, but only in the S1 tables (which I
> > would have to assume is the case on x86 as well)
> >
> >> That we then need to forward the caching attributes manually once more
> >> seems really misplaced.
> >>
>  Instead the client pgtables should be setup in a way so that host can
>  overwrite them.
> >>> How?  That is completely not how VMs work.  Even if the host knew
> >>> where the pgtables were and somehow magically knew the various guest
> >>> userspace VAs, it would be racey.
> >> Well you mentioned that the client page tables can be setup in a way
> >> that the host page tables determine what caching to use. As far as I can
> >> see this is what we should use here.
> > On arm64/aarch64, they *can*.. but the system (on some versions of
> > armv8) can also be configured to let S2 determine the attributes.  And
> > apparently there are benefits to this (avoids unnecessary cache
> > flushing in the host, AFAIU.)  This is the case where we need this new
> > api.
> >
> > IMO it is fine for the exporter to return a value indicating that the
> > attributes change dynamically or that S1 attributes must somehow be
> > used by the hw.  This would at least let the VMM return an error in
> > cases where S1 attrs cannot be relied on.  But there are enough
> > exporters where the cache attrs are static for the life of the buffer.
> > So even if you need to return DMA_BUF_MAP_I_DONT_KNOW, maybe that is
> > fine (if x86 can always rely on S1 attrs), or at least will let the
> > VMM return an error rather than just blindly assuming things will
> > work.
> >
> > But it makes no sense to reject the whole idea just because of some
> > exporters (which may not even need this).  There is always room to let
> > them return a map-info value that describes the situation or
> > limitations to the VMM.
>
> Well it does make sense as far as I can see.
>
> This is a very specific workaround for a platform problem which only
> matters there, but increases complexity for everybody.

I'm not sure how this adds complexity for everybody.. or at least the
intention was the default value for the new enum is the same as
current status-quo, so no need to plumb something thru every single
exporter.

BR,
-R

> If we don't have any other choice on the problem to work around that I
> would say ok we add an ARM specific workaround.
>
> But as long as that's not the case the whole idea is pretty clearly a
> NAK from my side.
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> >
> > BR,
> > -R
> >
> >> Regards,
> >> Christian.
> >>
> >>> BR,
> >>> -R
> >>>
>  Regards,
>  Christian.
> 
> > BR,
> > -R
> >
> >> Regards,
> >> Christian.
> >>
> >>> BR,
> >>> -R
> >>>
>  If the hardware can't use the caching information from the host CPU 
>  page
>  tables directly then that pretty much completely breaks the concept 
>  that
>  the exporter is responsible for setting up those page tables.
> 
>  Regards,
>  Christian.
> 
> >   drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c| 63 
> > +++--
> >   include/linux/dma-buf.h  | 11 ++
> >   include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 68 
> > 
> >   3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > index 32f55640890c..262c4706f721 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > @@ -125,6 +125,32 @@ static struct file_system_type dma_buf_fs_type 
> > = {
> >   .kill_sb = kill_anon_super,
> >   };
> >
> > +static int __dma_buf_mmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct 
> > 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dma-buf: Add ioctl to query mmap coherency/cache info

2022-08-18 Thread Christian König

Am 18.08.22 um 16:25 schrieb Rob Clark:

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 4:21 AM Christian König
 wrote:

Am 17.08.22 um 15:44 schrieb Rob Clark:

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:57 AM Christian König
 wrote:

[SNIP]

The resulting cache attrs from combination of S1 and S2 translation
can differ.  So ideally we setup the S2 pgtables in guest aligned with
host userspace mappings
Well exactly that is not very convincing.

What you want to do is to use one channel for the address and a
different one for the cache attrs, that's not something I would
recommend doing in general.

How would that work.. mmap() is the channel for the address, we'd need
to introduce a new syscall that returned additional information?

The channel for the address is not mmap(), but rather the page faults.
mmap() is just the function setting up that channel.

The page faults then insert both the address as well as the caching
attributes (at least on x86).

This is true on arm64 as well, but only in the S1 tables (which I
would have to assume is the case on x86 as well)


That we then need to forward the caching attributes manually once more
seems really misplaced.


Instead the client pgtables should be setup in a way so that host can
overwrite them.

How?  That is completely not how VMs work.  Even if the host knew
where the pgtables were and somehow magically knew the various guest
userspace VAs, it would be racey.

Well you mentioned that the client page tables can be setup in a way
that the host page tables determine what caching to use. As far as I can
see this is what we should use here.

On arm64/aarch64, they *can*.. but the system (on some versions of
armv8) can also be configured to let S2 determine the attributes.  And
apparently there are benefits to this (avoids unnecessary cache
flushing in the host, AFAIU.)  This is the case where we need this new
api.

IMO it is fine for the exporter to return a value indicating that the
attributes change dynamically or that S1 attributes must somehow be
used by the hw.  This would at least let the VMM return an error in
cases where S1 attrs cannot be relied on.  But there are enough
exporters where the cache attrs are static for the life of the buffer.
So even if you need to return DMA_BUF_MAP_I_DONT_KNOW, maybe that is
fine (if x86 can always rely on S1 attrs), or at least will let the
VMM return an error rather than just blindly assuming things will
work.

But it makes no sense to reject the whole idea just because of some
exporters (which may not even need this).  There is always room to let
them return a map-info value that describes the situation or
limitations to the VMM.


Well it does make sense as far as I can see.

This is a very specific workaround for a platform problem which only 
matters there, but increases complexity for everybody.


If we don't have any other choice on the problem to work around that I 
would say ok we add an ARM specific workaround.


But as long as that's not the case the whole idea is pretty clearly a 
NAK from my side.


Regards,
Christian.



BR,
-R


Regards,
Christian.


BR,
-R


Regards,
Christian.


BR,
-R


Regards,
Christian.


BR,
-R


If the hardware can't use the caching information from the host CPU page
tables directly then that pretty much completely breaks the concept that
the exporter is responsible for setting up those page tables.

Regards,
Christian.


  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c| 63 +++--
  include/linux/dma-buf.h  | 11 ++
  include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 68 
  3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 32f55640890c..262c4706f721 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -125,6 +125,32 @@ static struct file_system_type dma_buf_fs_type = {
  .kill_sb = kill_anon_super,
  };

+static int __dma_buf_mmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ /* check if buffer supports mmap */
+ if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = dmabuf->ops->mmap(dmabuf, vma);
+
+ /*
+  * If the exporter claims to support coherent access, ensure the
+  * pgprot flags match the claim.
+  */
+ if ((dmabuf->map_info != DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT) && !ret) {
+ pgprot_t wc_prot = pgprot_writecombine(vma->vm_page_prot);
+ if (dmabuf->map_info == DMA_BUF_COHERENT_WC) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) != 
pgprot_val(wc_prot));
+ } else {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) == 
pgprot_val(wc_prot));
+ }
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
  static int dma_buf_mmap_internal(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct 
*vma)
  {
  struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
@@ -134,16 +160,12 @@ static int dma_buf_mmap_internal(struct file *file, 
struct vm_area_struct *vma)


Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dma-buf: Add ioctl to query mmap coherency/cache info

2022-08-18 Thread Rob Clark
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 4:21 AM Christian König
 wrote:
>
> Am 17.08.22 um 15:44 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:57 AM Christian König
> >  wrote:
> >> [SNIP]
> >>
> >> The resulting cache attrs from combination of S1 and S2 translation
> >> can differ.  So ideally we setup the S2 pgtables in guest aligned with
> >> host userspace mappings
> >> Well exactly that is not very convincing.
> >>
> >> What you want to do is to use one channel for the address and a
> >> different one for the cache attrs, that's not something I would
> >> recommend doing in general.
> > How would that work.. mmap() is the channel for the address, we'd need
> > to introduce a new syscall that returned additional information?
>
> The channel for the address is not mmap(), but rather the page faults.
> mmap() is just the function setting up that channel.
>
> The page faults then insert both the address as well as the caching
> attributes (at least on x86).

This is true on arm64 as well, but only in the S1 tables (which I
would have to assume is the case on x86 as well)

> That we then need to forward the caching attributes manually once more
> seems really misplaced.
>
> >> Instead the client pgtables should be setup in a way so that host can
> >> overwrite them.
> > How?  That is completely not how VMs work.  Even if the host knew
> > where the pgtables were and somehow magically knew the various guest
> > userspace VAs, it would be racey.
>
> Well you mentioned that the client page tables can be setup in a way
> that the host page tables determine what caching to use. As far as I can
> see this is what we should use here.

On arm64/aarch64, they *can*.. but the system (on some versions of
armv8) can also be configured to let S2 determine the attributes.  And
apparently there are benefits to this (avoids unnecessary cache
flushing in the host, AFAIU.)  This is the case where we need this new
api.

IMO it is fine for the exporter to return a value indicating that the
attributes change dynamically or that S1 attributes must somehow be
used by the hw.  This would at least let the VMM return an error in
cases where S1 attrs cannot be relied on.  But there are enough
exporters where the cache attrs are static for the life of the buffer.
So even if you need to return DMA_BUF_MAP_I_DONT_KNOW, maybe that is
fine (if x86 can always rely on S1 attrs), or at least will let the
VMM return an error rather than just blindly assuming things will
work.

But it makes no sense to reject the whole idea just because of some
exporters (which may not even need this).  There is always room to let
them return a map-info value that describes the situation or
limitations to the VMM.

BR,
-R

> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> >
> > BR,
> > -R
> >
> >> Regards,
> >> Christian.
> >>
> >>> BR,
> >>> -R
> >>>
>  Regards,
>  Christian.
> 
> > BR,
> > -R
> >
> >> If the hardware can't use the caching information from the host CPU 
> >> page
> >> tables directly then that pretty much completely breaks the concept 
> >> that
> >> the exporter is responsible for setting up those page tables.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Christian.
> >>
> >>>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c| 63 
> >>> +++--
> >>>  include/linux/dma-buf.h  | 11 ++
> >>>  include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 68 
> >>> 
> >>>  3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> >>> index 32f55640890c..262c4706f721 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> >>> @@ -125,6 +125,32 @@ static struct file_system_type dma_buf_fs_type = 
> >>> {
> >>>  .kill_sb = kill_anon_super,
> >>>  };
> >>>
> >>> +static int __dma_buf_mmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct 
> >>> vm_area_struct *vma)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* check if buffer supports mmap */
> >>> + if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = dmabuf->ops->mmap(dmabuf, vma);
> >>> +
> >>> + /*
> >>> +  * If the exporter claims to support coherent access, ensure the
> >>> +  * pgprot flags match the claim.
> >>> +  */
> >>> + if ((dmabuf->map_info != DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT) && !ret) {
> >>> + pgprot_t wc_prot = 
> >>> pgprot_writecombine(vma->vm_page_prot);
> >>> + if (dmabuf->map_info == DMA_BUF_COHERENT_WC) {
> >>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) != 
> >>> pgprot_val(wc_prot));
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) == 
> >>> pgprot_val(wc_prot));
> >>> + }
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dma-buf: Add ioctl to query mmap coherency/cache info

2022-08-18 Thread Christian König

Am 17.08.22 um 15:44 schrieb Rob Clark:

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:57 AM Christian König
 wrote:

[SNIP]

The resulting cache attrs from combination of S1 and S2 translation
can differ.  So ideally we setup the S2 pgtables in guest aligned with
host userspace mappings
Well exactly that is not very convincing.

What you want to do is to use one channel for the address and a
different one for the cache attrs, that's not something I would
recommend doing in general.

How would that work.. mmap() is the channel for the address, we'd need
to introduce a new syscall that returned additional information?


The channel for the address is not mmap(), but rather the page faults. 
mmap() is just the function setting up that channel.


The page faults then insert both the address as well as the caching 
attributes (at least on x86).


That we then need to forward the caching attributes manually once more 
seems really misplaced.



Instead the client pgtables should be setup in a way so that host can
overwrite them.

How?  That is completely not how VMs work.  Even if the host knew
where the pgtables were and somehow magically knew the various guest
userspace VAs, it would be racey.


Well you mentioned that the client page tables can be setup in a way 
that the host page tables determine what caching to use. As far as I can 
see this is what we should use here.


Regards,
Christian.



BR,
-R


Regards,
Christian.


BR,
-R


Regards,
Christian.


BR,
-R


If the hardware can't use the caching information from the host CPU page
tables directly then that pretty much completely breaks the concept that
the exporter is responsible for setting up those page tables.

Regards,
Christian.


 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c| 63 +++--
 include/linux/dma-buf.h  | 11 ++
 include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 68 
 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 32f55640890c..262c4706f721 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -125,6 +125,32 @@ static struct file_system_type dma_buf_fs_type = {
 .kill_sb = kill_anon_super,
 };

+static int __dma_buf_mmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ /* check if buffer supports mmap */
+ if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = dmabuf->ops->mmap(dmabuf, vma);
+
+ /*
+  * If the exporter claims to support coherent access, ensure the
+  * pgprot flags match the claim.
+  */
+ if ((dmabuf->map_info != DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT) && !ret) {
+ pgprot_t wc_prot = pgprot_writecombine(vma->vm_page_prot);
+ if (dmabuf->map_info == DMA_BUF_COHERENT_WC) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) != 
pgprot_val(wc_prot));
+ } else {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) == 
pgprot_val(wc_prot));
+ }
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
 static int dma_buf_mmap_internal(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct 
*vma)
 {
 struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
@@ -134,16 +160,12 @@ static int dma_buf_mmap_internal(struct file *file, 
struct vm_area_struct *vma)

 dmabuf = file->private_data;

- /* check if buffer supports mmap */
- if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
- return -EINVAL;
-
 /* check for overflowing the buffer's size */
 if (vma->vm_pgoff + vma_pages(vma) >
 dmabuf->size >> PAGE_SHIFT)
 return -EINVAL;

- return dmabuf->ops->mmap(dmabuf, vma);
+ return __dma_buf_mmap(dmabuf, vma);
 }

 static loff_t dma_buf_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
@@ -326,6 +348,27 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, const 
char __user *buf)
 return 0;
 }

+static long dma_buf_info(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, void __user *uarg)
+{
+ struct dma_buf_info arg;
+
+ if (copy_from_user(, uarg, sizeof(arg)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ switch (arg.param) {
+ case DMA_BUF_INFO_MAP_INFO:
+ arg.value = dmabuf->map_info;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (copy_to_user(uarg, , sizeof(arg)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
 static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
   unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 {
@@ -369,6 +412,9 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
 case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B:
 return dma_buf_set_name(dmabuf, (const char __user *)arg);

+ case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_INFO:
+ return dma_buf_info(dmabuf, (void __user *)arg);
+
 default:
 return -ENOTTY;
 }
@@ -530,6 +576,7 @@ struct dma_buf *dma_buf_export(const struct 
dma_buf_export_info *exp_info)
 dmabuf->priv = exp_info->priv;
 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dma-buf: Add ioctl to query mmap coherency/cache info

2022-08-17 Thread Rob Clark
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:57 AM Christian König
 wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 16.08.22 um 19:29 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 9:51 AM Christian König
> >  wrote:
> >> Am 16.08.22 um 16:26 schrieb Rob Clark:
> >>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 1:27 AM Christian König
> >>>  wrote:
>  Am 15.08.22 um 23:15 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > From: Rob Clark 
> >
> > This is a fairly narrowly focused interface, providing a way for a VMM
> > in userspace to tell the guest kernel what pgprot settings to use when
> > mapping a buffer to guest userspace.
> >
> > For buffers that get mapped into guest userspace, virglrenderer returns
> > a dma-buf fd to the VMM (crosvm or qemu).  In addition to mapping the
> > pages into the guest VM, it needs to report to drm/virtio in the guest
> > the cache settings to use for guest userspace.  In particular, on some
> > architectures, creating aliased mappings with different cache attributes
> > is frowned upon, so it is important that the guest mappings have the
> > same cache attributes as any potential host mappings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark 
> > ---
> > v2: Combine with coherency, as that is a related concept.. and it is
> >relevant to the VMM whether coherent access without the SYNC 
> > ioctl
> >is possible; set map_info at export time to make it more clear
> >that it applies for the lifetime of the dma-buf (for any mmap
> >created via the dma-buf)
>  Well, exactly that's a conceptual NAK from my side.
> 
>  The caching information can change at any time. For CPU mappings even
>  without further notice from the exporter.
> >>> You should look before you criticize, as I left you a way out.. the
> >>> idea was that DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT should indicate that the buffer
> >>> cannot be mapped to the guest.  We could ofc add more DMA_BUF_MAP_*
> >>> values if something else would suit you better.  But the goal is to
> >>> give the VMM enough information to dtrt, or return an error if mapping
> >>> to guest is not possible.  That seems better than assuming mapping to
> >>> guest will work and guessing about cache attrs
> >> Well I'm not rejecting the implementation, I'm rejecting this from the
> >> conceptual point of view.
> >>
> >> We intentional gave the exporter full control over the CPU mappings.
> >> This approach here breaks that now.
> >>
> >> I haven't seen the full detailed reason why we should do that and to be
> >> honest KVM seems to mess with things it is not supposed to touch.
> >>
> >> For example the page reference count of mappings marked with VM_IO is a
> >> complete no-go. This is a very strong evidence that this was based on
> >> rather dangerous halve knowledge about the background of the handling here.
> >>
> >> So as long as I don't see a full explanation why KVM is grabbing
> >> reference to pages while faulting them and why we manually need to
> >> forward the caching while the hardware documentation indicates otherwise
> >> I will be rejecting this whole approach.
> > Didn't we cover this on the previous iteration already.  From a host
> > kernel PoV these are just normal host userspace mappings.  The
> > userspace VMM mapping becomes the "physical address" in the guest and
> > the stage 2 translation tables map it to the guest userspace.
> >
> > The resulting cache attrs from combination of S1 and S2 translation
> > can differ.  So ideally we setup the S2 pgtables in guest aligned with
> > host userspace mappings
>
> Well exactly that is not very convincing.
>
> What you want to do is to use one channel for the address and a
> different one for the cache attrs, that's not something I would
> recommend doing in general.

How would that work.. mmap() is the channel for the address, we'd need
to introduce a new syscall that returned additional information?

> Instead the client pgtables should be setup in a way so that host can
> overwrite them.

How?  That is completely not how VMs work.  Even if the host knew
where the pgtables were and somehow magically knew the various guest
userspace VAs, it would be racey.

BR,
-R

> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> >
> > BR,
> > -R
> >
> >> Regards,
> >> Christian.
> >>
> >>> BR,
> >>> -R
> >>>
>  If the hardware can't use the caching information from the host CPU page
>  tables directly then that pretty much completely breaks the concept that
>  the exporter is responsible for setting up those page tables.
> 
>  Regards,
>  Christian.
> 
> > drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c| 63 +++--
> > include/linux/dma-buf.h  | 11 ++
> > include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 68 
> > 
> > 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > index 32f55640890c..262c4706f721 100644
> > 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dma-buf: Add ioctl to query mmap coherency/cache info

2022-08-17 Thread Christian König




Am 16.08.22 um 19:29 schrieb Rob Clark:

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 9:51 AM Christian König
 wrote:

Am 16.08.22 um 16:26 schrieb Rob Clark:

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 1:27 AM Christian König
 wrote:

Am 15.08.22 um 23:15 schrieb Rob Clark:

From: Rob Clark 

This is a fairly narrowly focused interface, providing a way for a VMM
in userspace to tell the guest kernel what pgprot settings to use when
mapping a buffer to guest userspace.

For buffers that get mapped into guest userspace, virglrenderer returns
a dma-buf fd to the VMM (crosvm or qemu).  In addition to mapping the
pages into the guest VM, it needs to report to drm/virtio in the guest
the cache settings to use for guest userspace.  In particular, on some
architectures, creating aliased mappings with different cache attributes
is frowned upon, so it is important that the guest mappings have the
same cache attributes as any potential host mappings.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark 
---
v2: Combine with coherency, as that is a related concept.. and it is
   relevant to the VMM whether coherent access without the SYNC ioctl
   is possible; set map_info at export time to make it more clear
   that it applies for the lifetime of the dma-buf (for any mmap
   created via the dma-buf)

Well, exactly that's a conceptual NAK from my side.

The caching information can change at any time. For CPU mappings even
without further notice from the exporter.

You should look before you criticize, as I left you a way out.. the
idea was that DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT should indicate that the buffer
cannot be mapped to the guest.  We could ofc add more DMA_BUF_MAP_*
values if something else would suit you better.  But the goal is to
give the VMM enough information to dtrt, or return an error if mapping
to guest is not possible.  That seems better than assuming mapping to
guest will work and guessing about cache attrs

Well I'm not rejecting the implementation, I'm rejecting this from the
conceptual point of view.

We intentional gave the exporter full control over the CPU mappings.
This approach here breaks that now.

I haven't seen the full detailed reason why we should do that and to be
honest KVM seems to mess with things it is not supposed to touch.

For example the page reference count of mappings marked with VM_IO is a
complete no-go. This is a very strong evidence that this was based on
rather dangerous halve knowledge about the background of the handling here.

So as long as I don't see a full explanation why KVM is grabbing
reference to pages while faulting them and why we manually need to
forward the caching while the hardware documentation indicates otherwise
I will be rejecting this whole approach.

Didn't we cover this on the previous iteration already.  From a host
kernel PoV these are just normal host userspace mappings.  The
userspace VMM mapping becomes the "physical address" in the guest and
the stage 2 translation tables map it to the guest userspace.

The resulting cache attrs from combination of S1 and S2 translation
can differ.  So ideally we setup the S2 pgtables in guest aligned with
host userspace mappings


Well exactly that is not very convincing.

What you want to do is to use one channel for the address and a 
different one for the cache attrs, that's not something I would 
recommend doing in general.


Instead the client pgtables should be setup in a way so that host can 
overwrite them.


Regards,
Christian.



BR,
-R


Regards,
Christian.


BR,
-R


If the hardware can't use the caching information from the host CPU page
tables directly then that pretty much completely breaks the concept that
the exporter is responsible for setting up those page tables.

Regards,
Christian.


drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c| 63 +++--
include/linux/dma-buf.h  | 11 ++
include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 68 
3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 32f55640890c..262c4706f721 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -125,6 +125,32 @@ static struct file_system_type dma_buf_fs_type = {
.kill_sb = kill_anon_super,
};

+static int __dma_buf_mmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ /* check if buffer supports mmap */
+ if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = dmabuf->ops->mmap(dmabuf, vma);
+
+ /*
+  * If the exporter claims to support coherent access, ensure the
+  * pgprot flags match the claim.
+  */
+ if ((dmabuf->map_info != DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT) && !ret) {
+ pgprot_t wc_prot = pgprot_writecombine(vma->vm_page_prot);
+ if (dmabuf->map_info == DMA_BUF_COHERENT_WC) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) != 
pgprot_val(wc_prot));
+ } else {
+ 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dma-buf: Add ioctl to query mmap coherency/cache info

2022-08-16 Thread Rob Clark
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 9:51 AM Christian König
 wrote:
>
> Am 16.08.22 um 16:26 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 1:27 AM Christian König
> >  wrote:
> >> Am 15.08.22 um 23:15 schrieb Rob Clark:
> >>> From: Rob Clark 
> >>>
> >>> This is a fairly narrowly focused interface, providing a way for a VMM
> >>> in userspace to tell the guest kernel what pgprot settings to use when
> >>> mapping a buffer to guest userspace.
> >>>
> >>> For buffers that get mapped into guest userspace, virglrenderer returns
> >>> a dma-buf fd to the VMM (crosvm or qemu).  In addition to mapping the
> >>> pages into the guest VM, it needs to report to drm/virtio in the guest
> >>> the cache settings to use for guest userspace.  In particular, on some
> >>> architectures, creating aliased mappings with different cache attributes
> >>> is frowned upon, so it is important that the guest mappings have the
> >>> same cache attributes as any potential host mappings.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark 
> >>> ---
> >>> v2: Combine with coherency, as that is a related concept.. and it is
> >>>   relevant to the VMM whether coherent access without the SYNC ioctl
> >>>   is possible; set map_info at export time to make it more clear
> >>>   that it applies for the lifetime of the dma-buf (for any mmap
> >>>   created via the dma-buf)
> >> Well, exactly that's a conceptual NAK from my side.
> >>
> >> The caching information can change at any time. For CPU mappings even
> >> without further notice from the exporter.
> > You should look before you criticize, as I left you a way out.. the
> > idea was that DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT should indicate that the buffer
> > cannot be mapped to the guest.  We could ofc add more DMA_BUF_MAP_*
> > values if something else would suit you better.  But the goal is to
> > give the VMM enough information to dtrt, or return an error if mapping
> > to guest is not possible.  That seems better than assuming mapping to
> > guest will work and guessing about cache attrs
>
> Well I'm not rejecting the implementation, I'm rejecting this from the
> conceptual point of view.
>
> We intentional gave the exporter full control over the CPU mappings.
> This approach here breaks that now.
>
> I haven't seen the full detailed reason why we should do that and to be
> honest KVM seems to mess with things it is not supposed to touch.
>
> For example the page reference count of mappings marked with VM_IO is a
> complete no-go. This is a very strong evidence that this was based on
> rather dangerous halve knowledge about the background of the handling here.
>
> So as long as I don't see a full explanation why KVM is grabbing
> reference to pages while faulting them and why we manually need to
> forward the caching while the hardware documentation indicates otherwise
> I will be rejecting this whole approach.

Didn't we cover this on the previous iteration already.  From a host
kernel PoV these are just normal host userspace mappings.  The
userspace VMM mapping becomes the "physical address" in the guest and
the stage 2 translation tables map it to the guest userspace.

The resulting cache attrs from combination of S1 and S2 translation
can differ.  So ideally we setup the S2 pgtables in guest aligned with
host userspace mappings

BR,
-R

>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> >
> > BR,
> > -R
> >
> >> If the hardware can't use the caching information from the host CPU page
> >> tables directly then that pretty much completely breaks the concept that
> >> the exporter is responsible for setting up those page tables.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Christian.
> >>
> >>>drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c| 63 +++--
> >>>include/linux/dma-buf.h  | 11 ++
> >>>include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 68 
> >>>3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> >>> index 32f55640890c..262c4706f721 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> >>> @@ -125,6 +125,32 @@ static struct file_system_type dma_buf_fs_type = {
> >>>.kill_sb = kill_anon_super,
> >>>};
> >>>
> >>> +static int __dma_buf_mmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct vm_area_struct 
> >>> *vma)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* check if buffer supports mmap */
> >>> + if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = dmabuf->ops->mmap(dmabuf, vma);
> >>> +
> >>> + /*
> >>> +  * If the exporter claims to support coherent access, ensure the
> >>> +  * pgprot flags match the claim.
> >>> +  */
> >>> + if ((dmabuf->map_info != DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT) && !ret) {
> >>> + pgprot_t wc_prot = pgprot_writecombine(vma->vm_page_prot);
> >>> + if (dmabuf->map_info == DMA_BUF_COHERENT_WC) {
> >>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) != 
> >>> 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dma-buf: Add ioctl to query mmap coherency/cache info

2022-08-16 Thread Christian König

Am 16.08.22 um 16:26 schrieb Rob Clark:

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 1:27 AM Christian König
 wrote:

Am 15.08.22 um 23:15 schrieb Rob Clark:

From: Rob Clark 

This is a fairly narrowly focused interface, providing a way for a VMM
in userspace to tell the guest kernel what pgprot settings to use when
mapping a buffer to guest userspace.

For buffers that get mapped into guest userspace, virglrenderer returns
a dma-buf fd to the VMM (crosvm or qemu).  In addition to mapping the
pages into the guest VM, it needs to report to drm/virtio in the guest
the cache settings to use for guest userspace.  In particular, on some
architectures, creating aliased mappings with different cache attributes
is frowned upon, so it is important that the guest mappings have the
same cache attributes as any potential host mappings.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark 
---
v2: Combine with coherency, as that is a related concept.. and it is
  relevant to the VMM whether coherent access without the SYNC ioctl
  is possible; set map_info at export time to make it more clear
  that it applies for the lifetime of the dma-buf (for any mmap
  created via the dma-buf)

Well, exactly that's a conceptual NAK from my side.

The caching information can change at any time. For CPU mappings even
without further notice from the exporter.

You should look before you criticize, as I left you a way out.. the
idea was that DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT should indicate that the buffer
cannot be mapped to the guest.  We could ofc add more DMA_BUF_MAP_*
values if something else would suit you better.  But the goal is to
give the VMM enough information to dtrt, or return an error if mapping
to guest is not possible.  That seems better than assuming mapping to
guest will work and guessing about cache attrs


Well I'm not rejecting the implementation, I'm rejecting this from the 
conceptual point of view.


We intentional gave the exporter full control over the CPU mappings. 
This approach here breaks that now.


I haven't seen the full detailed reason why we should do that and to be 
honest KVM seems to mess with things it is not supposed to touch.


For example the page reference count of mappings marked with VM_IO is a 
complete no-go. This is a very strong evidence that this was based on 
rather dangerous halve knowledge about the background of the handling here.


So as long as I don't see a full explanation why KVM is grabbing 
reference to pages while faulting them and why we manually need to 
forward the caching while the hardware documentation indicates otherwise 
I will be rejecting this whole approach.


Regards,
Christian.



BR,
-R


If the hardware can't use the caching information from the host CPU page
tables directly then that pretty much completely breaks the concept that
the exporter is responsible for setting up those page tables.

Regards,
Christian.


   drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c| 63 +++--
   include/linux/dma-buf.h  | 11 ++
   include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 68 
   3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 32f55640890c..262c4706f721 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -125,6 +125,32 @@ static struct file_system_type dma_buf_fs_type = {
   .kill_sb = kill_anon_super,
   };

+static int __dma_buf_mmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ /* check if buffer supports mmap */
+ if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = dmabuf->ops->mmap(dmabuf, vma);
+
+ /*
+  * If the exporter claims to support coherent access, ensure the
+  * pgprot flags match the claim.
+  */
+ if ((dmabuf->map_info != DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT) && !ret) {
+ pgprot_t wc_prot = pgprot_writecombine(vma->vm_page_prot);
+ if (dmabuf->map_info == DMA_BUF_COHERENT_WC) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) != 
pgprot_val(wc_prot));
+ } else {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) == 
pgprot_val(wc_prot));
+ }
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
   static int dma_buf_mmap_internal(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct 
*vma)
   {
   struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
@@ -134,16 +160,12 @@ static int dma_buf_mmap_internal(struct file *file, 
struct vm_area_struct *vma)

   dmabuf = file->private_data;

- /* check if buffer supports mmap */
- if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
- return -EINVAL;
-
   /* check for overflowing the buffer's size */
   if (vma->vm_pgoff + vma_pages(vma) >
   dmabuf->size >> PAGE_SHIFT)
   return -EINVAL;

- return dmabuf->ops->mmap(dmabuf, vma);
+ return __dma_buf_mmap(dmabuf, vma);
   }

   static loff_t dma_buf_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
@@ -326,6 +348,27 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dma-buf: Add ioctl to query mmap coherency/cache info

2022-08-16 Thread Rob Clark
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 1:27 AM Christian König
 wrote:
>
> Am 15.08.22 um 23:15 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > From: Rob Clark 
> >
> > This is a fairly narrowly focused interface, providing a way for a VMM
> > in userspace to tell the guest kernel what pgprot settings to use when
> > mapping a buffer to guest userspace.
> >
> > For buffers that get mapped into guest userspace, virglrenderer returns
> > a dma-buf fd to the VMM (crosvm or qemu).  In addition to mapping the
> > pages into the guest VM, it needs to report to drm/virtio in the guest
> > the cache settings to use for guest userspace.  In particular, on some
> > architectures, creating aliased mappings with different cache attributes
> > is frowned upon, so it is important that the guest mappings have the
> > same cache attributes as any potential host mappings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark 
> > ---
> > v2: Combine with coherency, as that is a related concept.. and it is
> >  relevant to the VMM whether coherent access without the SYNC ioctl
> >  is possible; set map_info at export time to make it more clear
> >  that it applies for the lifetime of the dma-buf (for any mmap
> >  created via the dma-buf)
>
> Well, exactly that's a conceptual NAK from my side.
>
> The caching information can change at any time. For CPU mappings even
> without further notice from the exporter.

You should look before you criticize, as I left you a way out.. the
idea was that DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT should indicate that the buffer
cannot be mapped to the guest.  We could ofc add more DMA_BUF_MAP_*
values if something else would suit you better.  But the goal is to
give the VMM enough information to dtrt, or return an error if mapping
to guest is not possible.  That seems better than assuming mapping to
guest will work and guessing about cache attrs

BR,
-R

> If the hardware can't use the caching information from the host CPU page
> tables directly then that pretty much completely breaks the concept that
> the exporter is responsible for setting up those page tables.
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> >
> >   drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c| 63 +++--
> >   include/linux/dma-buf.h  | 11 ++
> >   include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 68 
> >   3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > index 32f55640890c..262c4706f721 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > @@ -125,6 +125,32 @@ static struct file_system_type dma_buf_fs_type = {
> >   .kill_sb = kill_anon_super,
> >   };
> >
> > +static int __dma_buf_mmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct vm_area_struct 
> > *vma)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /* check if buffer supports mmap */
> > + if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + ret = dmabuf->ops->mmap(dmabuf, vma);
> > +
> > + /*
> > +  * If the exporter claims to support coherent access, ensure the
> > +  * pgprot flags match the claim.
> > +  */
> > + if ((dmabuf->map_info != DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT) && !ret) {
> > + pgprot_t wc_prot = pgprot_writecombine(vma->vm_page_prot);
> > + if (dmabuf->map_info == DMA_BUF_COHERENT_WC) {
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) != 
> > pgprot_val(wc_prot));
> > + } else {
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) == 
> > pgprot_val(wc_prot));
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >   static int dma_buf_mmap_internal(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct 
> > *vma)
> >   {
> >   struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
> > @@ -134,16 +160,12 @@ static int dma_buf_mmap_internal(struct file *file, 
> > struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> >
> >   dmabuf = file->private_data;
> >
> > - /* check if buffer supports mmap */
> > - if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> >   /* check for overflowing the buffer's size */
> >   if (vma->vm_pgoff + vma_pages(vma) >
> >   dmabuf->size >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> >   return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - return dmabuf->ops->mmap(dmabuf, vma);
> > + return __dma_buf_mmap(dmabuf, vma);
> >   }
> >
> >   static loff_t dma_buf_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
> > @@ -326,6 +348,27 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, 
> > const char __user *buf)
> >   return 0;
> >   }
> >
> > +static long dma_buf_info(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, void __user *uarg)
> > +{
> > + struct dma_buf_info arg;
> > +
> > + if (copy_from_user(, uarg, sizeof(arg)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + switch (arg.param) {
> > + case DMA_BUF_INFO_MAP_INFO:
> > + arg.value = dmabuf->map_info;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (copy_to_user(uarg, , 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dma-buf: Add ioctl to query mmap coherency/cache info

2022-08-16 Thread Christian König

Am 15.08.22 um 23:15 schrieb Rob Clark:

From: Rob Clark 

This is a fairly narrowly focused interface, providing a way for a VMM
in userspace to tell the guest kernel what pgprot settings to use when
mapping a buffer to guest userspace.

For buffers that get mapped into guest userspace, virglrenderer returns
a dma-buf fd to the VMM (crosvm or qemu).  In addition to mapping the
pages into the guest VM, it needs to report to drm/virtio in the guest
the cache settings to use for guest userspace.  In particular, on some
architectures, creating aliased mappings with different cache attributes
is frowned upon, so it is important that the guest mappings have the
same cache attributes as any potential host mappings.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark 
---
v2: Combine with coherency, as that is a related concept.. and it is
 relevant to the VMM whether coherent access without the SYNC ioctl
 is possible; set map_info at export time to make it more clear
 that it applies for the lifetime of the dma-buf (for any mmap
 created via the dma-buf)


Well, exactly that's a conceptual NAK from my side.

The caching information can change at any time. For CPU mappings even 
without further notice from the exporter.


If the hardware can't use the caching information from the host CPU page 
tables directly then that pretty much completely breaks the concept that 
the exporter is responsible for setting up those page tables.


Regards,
Christian.



  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c| 63 +++--
  include/linux/dma-buf.h  | 11 ++
  include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 68 
  3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 32f55640890c..262c4706f721 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -125,6 +125,32 @@ static struct file_system_type dma_buf_fs_type = {
.kill_sb = kill_anon_super,
  };
  
+static int __dma_buf_mmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

+{
+   int ret;
+
+   /* check if buffer supports mmap */
+   if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
+   return -EINVAL;
+
+   ret = dmabuf->ops->mmap(dmabuf, vma);
+
+   /*
+* If the exporter claims to support coherent access, ensure the
+* pgprot flags match the claim.
+*/
+   if ((dmabuf->map_info != DMA_BUF_MAP_INCOHERENT) && !ret) {
+   pgprot_t wc_prot = pgprot_writecombine(vma->vm_page_prot);
+   if (dmabuf->map_info == DMA_BUF_COHERENT_WC) {
+   WARN_ON_ONCE(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) != 
pgprot_val(wc_prot));
+   } else {
+   WARN_ON_ONCE(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) == 
pgprot_val(wc_prot));
+   }
+   }
+
+   return ret;
+}
+
  static int dma_buf_mmap_internal(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct 
*vma)
  {
struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
@@ -134,16 +160,12 @@ static int dma_buf_mmap_internal(struct file *file, 
struct vm_area_struct *vma)
  
  	dmabuf = file->private_data;
  
-	/* check if buffer supports mmap */

-   if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
-   return -EINVAL;
-
/* check for overflowing the buffer's size */
if (vma->vm_pgoff + vma_pages(vma) >
dmabuf->size >> PAGE_SHIFT)
return -EINVAL;
  
-	return dmabuf->ops->mmap(dmabuf, vma);

+   return __dma_buf_mmap(dmabuf, vma);
  }
  
  static loff_t dma_buf_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

@@ -326,6 +348,27 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, const 
char __user *buf)
return 0;
  }
  
+static long dma_buf_info(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, void __user *uarg)

+{
+   struct dma_buf_info arg;
+
+   if (copy_from_user(, uarg, sizeof(arg)))
+   return -EFAULT;
+
+   switch (arg.param) {
+   case DMA_BUF_INFO_MAP_INFO:
+   arg.value = dmabuf->map_info;
+   break;
+   default:
+   return -EINVAL;
+   }
+
+   if (copy_to_user(uarg, , sizeof(arg)))
+   return -EFAULT;
+
+   return 0;
+}
+
  static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
  unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
  {
@@ -369,6 +412,9 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B:
return dma_buf_set_name(dmabuf, (const char __user *)arg);
  
+	case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_INFO:

+   return dma_buf_info(dmabuf, (void __user *)arg);
+
default:
return -ENOTTY;
}
@@ -530,6 +576,7 @@ struct dma_buf *dma_buf_export(const struct 
dma_buf_export_info *exp_info)
dmabuf->priv = exp_info->priv;
dmabuf->ops = exp_info->ops;
dmabuf->size = exp_info->size;
+   dmabuf->map_info = exp_info->map_info;
dmabuf->exp_name = exp_info->exp_name;
dmabuf->owner = exp_info->owner;