Re: i915 build error on drm-misc-next

2024-02-23 Thread Abhinav Kumar




On 2/23/2024 11:35 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 09:47:11AM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:

CC Dmitry

Hi Rodrigo

On 2/23/2024 9:00 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 08:50:06AM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:

With the x86_64_defconfig I see the following when building drm-misc-next:

CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crt.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_dcs_backlight.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lvds.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.o
CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.o
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c: In function
‘intel_write_dp_vsc_sdp’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:4232:15: error: implicit declaration
of function ‘intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack’; did you mean ‘drm_dp_vsc_sdp_pack’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   4232 | len = intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack(vsc, , sizeof(sdp));
|   ^
|   drm_dp_vsc_sdp_pack

Is this a known issue?


o.O - what a mistery!

it looks that drm-misc-next has only part of the patch:
31a5b6ed88c7 ("drm/i915/display: Unify VSC SPD preparation")

without the patch itself...

I couldn't even trace back to understand how the declaration is
gone from the drm-misc-next...



Looks like the issue here is that the below patch which landed in
drm-misc-next

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/579128/?series=130145=1

was based on top of drm-tip because the intel CI runs on drm-tip and not
drm-misc-next.

But, https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/572622/ is not present in
drm-misc-next.

Hence this broke the compilation.

How would you prefer to fix this? We revert
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130145/ from drm-misc and land it
through i915 tree and can you provide us a tag from the i915 tree to rebase
our msm-next tree on?


The revert from drm-misc is a possibility, then you squash
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240223191548.392185-1-rodrigo.v...@intel.com/
in and merge it again.

or if drm-misc and drm maintainers are okay we can simply add
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240223191548.392185-1-rodrigo.v...@intel.com/
on top of drm-misc-next



I am totally fine with this second option. Have given my R-b.



and on any conflict later the resolution is simply deleting this line
anyway.





-Jeff


Re: i915 build error on drm-misc-next

2024-02-23 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 09:47:11AM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> CC Dmitry
> 
> Hi Rodrigo
> 
> On 2/23/2024 9:00 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 08:50:06AM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > > With the x86_64_defconfig I see the following when building drm-misc-next:
> > > 
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crt.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_dcs_backlight.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lvds.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.o
> > >CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.o
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c: In function
> > > ‘intel_write_dp_vsc_sdp’:
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:4232:15: error: implicit 
> > > declaration
> > > of function ‘intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack’; did you mean ‘drm_dp_vsc_sdp_pack’?
> > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > >   4232 | len = intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack(vsc, , sizeof(sdp));
> > >|   ^
> > >|   drm_dp_vsc_sdp_pack
> > > 
> > > Is this a known issue?
> > 
> > o.O - what a mistery!
> > 
> > it looks that drm-misc-next has only part of the patch:
> > 31a5b6ed88c7 ("drm/i915/display: Unify VSC SPD preparation")
> > 
> > without the patch itself...
> > 
> > I couldn't even trace back to understand how the declaration is
> > gone from the drm-misc-next...
> > 
> 
> Looks like the issue here is that the below patch which landed in
> drm-misc-next
> 
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/579128/?series=130145=1
> 
> was based on top of drm-tip because the intel CI runs on drm-tip and not
> drm-misc-next.
> 
> But, https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/572622/ is not present in
> drm-misc-next.
> 
> Hence this broke the compilation.
> 
> How would you prefer to fix this? We revert
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130145/ from drm-misc and land it
> through i915 tree and can you provide us a tag from the i915 tree to rebase
> our msm-next tree on?

The revert from drm-misc is a possibility, then you squash
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240223191548.392185-1-rodrigo.v...@intel.com/
in and merge it again.

or if drm-misc and drm maintainers are okay we can simply add
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240223191548.392185-1-rodrigo.v...@intel.com/
on top of drm-misc-next

and on any conflict later the resolution is simply deleting this line
anyway.

> 
> > > 
> > > -Jeff


Re: i915 build error on drm-misc-next

2024-02-23 Thread Abhinav Kumar

CC Dmitry

Hi Rodrigo

On 2/23/2024 9:00 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 08:50:06AM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:

With the x86_64_defconfig I see the following when building drm-misc-next:

   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crt.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_dcs_backlight.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lvds.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.o
   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.o
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c: In function
‘intel_write_dp_vsc_sdp’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:4232:15: error: implicit declaration
of function ‘intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack’; did you mean ‘drm_dp_vsc_sdp_pack’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  4232 | len = intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack(vsc, , sizeof(sdp));
   |   ^
   |   drm_dp_vsc_sdp_pack

Is this a known issue?


o.O - what a mistery!

it looks that drm-misc-next has only part of the patch:
31a5b6ed88c7 ("drm/i915/display: Unify VSC SPD preparation")

without the patch itself...

I couldn't even trace back to understand how the declaration is
gone from the drm-misc-next...



Looks like the issue here is that the below patch which landed in 
drm-misc-next


https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/579128/?series=130145=1

was based on top of drm-tip because the intel CI runs on drm-tip and not 
drm-misc-next.


But, https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/572622/ is not present in 
drm-misc-next.


Hence this broke the compilation.

How would you prefer to fix this? We revert 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130145/ from drm-misc and land 
it through i915 tree and can you provide us a tag from the i915 tree to 
rebase our msm-next tree on?




-Jeff


Re: i915 build error on drm-misc-next

2024-02-23 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 08:50:06AM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> With the x86_64_defconfig I see the following when building drm-misc-next:
> 
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crt.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_dcs_backlight.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lvds.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.o
>   CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.o
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c: In function
> ‘intel_write_dp_vsc_sdp’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:4232:15: error: implicit declaration
> of function ‘intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack’; did you mean ‘drm_dp_vsc_sdp_pack’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>  4232 | len = intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack(vsc, , sizeof(sdp));
>   |   ^
>   |   drm_dp_vsc_sdp_pack
> 
> Is this a known issue?

o.O - what a mistery!

it looks that drm-misc-next has only part of the patch:
31a5b6ed88c7 ("drm/i915/display: Unify VSC SPD preparation")

without the patch itself...

I couldn't even trace back to understand how the declaration is
gone from the drm-misc-next...

> 
> -Jeff


i915 build error on drm-misc-next

2024-02-23 Thread Jeffrey Hugo

With the x86_64_defconfig I see the following when building drm-misc-next:

  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crt.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_dcs_backlight.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lvds.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.o
  CC  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.o
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c: In function 
‘intel_write_dp_vsc_sdp’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:4232:15: error: implicit 
declaration of function ‘intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack’; did you mean 
‘drm_dp_vsc_sdp_pack’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

 4232 | len = intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack(vsc, , sizeof(sdp));
  |   ^
  |   drm_dp_vsc_sdp_pack

Is this a known issue?

-Jeff