[Bug 1648] R200 SWTCL path doesn't do projtex right

2009-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1648


ajax at nwnk dot net  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|CVS |git




--- Comment #7 from ajax at nwnk dot net   2009-08-24 12:22:47 
PST ---
Mass version move, cvs -> git


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel


[Bug 1648] R200 SWTCL path doesn't do projtex right

2005-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
   
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. 
   
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1648  
 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-02-10 10:31 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> First I thought
> if (tnl->render_inputs & _TNL_BITS_TEX_ANY)
> might not be up to date, but at least in projtex it seems so.
Thought that too first, but then I guessed if _TNL_BITS_TEX_ANY wouldn't be up
to date, it would not work correctly at all, since the code would incorrectly
select the tiny vertex format in cases where it shouldn't.
Applied to cvs.
  
 
 
--   
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel


[Bug 1648] R200 SWTCL path doesn't do projtex right

2005-02-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to 
   
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. 
   
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1648  
 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dri-
   ||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-02-06 10:50 ---
your patch seems to work well at least for projtex.
First I thought
if (tnl->render_inputs & _TNL_BITS_TEX_ANY)
might not be up to date, but at least in projtex it seems so.

Someone here to try this patch with other programs that make use of projtex ?   
   
 
 
--   
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel