drm/radeon/kms: request for rebasing
Dave, we have some commits in drm-linus that are not present in drm-radeon-testing. Maybe this is the case with other active branches as well, don't know. Could you rebase branches to be more clear, please? Maybe rebasing agains .33 even? -- Rafał -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: drm/radeon/kms: request for rebasing
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 10:42 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: Dave, we have some commits in drm-linus that are not present in drm-radeon-testing. Maybe this is the case with other active branches as well, don't know. Could you rebase branches to be more clear, please? Maybe rebasing agains .33 even? I think it's great to keep branches based on the last release as long as possible. It allows testing DRM changes easily without pulling in random other changes. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer |http://www.vmware.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: drm/radeon/kms: request for rebasing
W dniu 25 lutego 2010 10:46 użytkownik Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net napisał: On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 10:42 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: Dave, we have some commits in drm-linus that are not present in drm-radeon-testing. Maybe this is the case with other active branches as well, don't know. Could you rebase branches to be more clear, please? Maybe rebasing agains .33 even? I think it's great to keep branches based on the last release as long as possible. It allows testing DRM changes easily without pulling in random other changes. OK, I don't insist on 2.6.33. But that should not be the case when we have few patches commited to drm-linus and few to drm-radeon-testing. It makes some work impossible. -- Rafał -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
