Re: [PATCH] staging: usbip: userspace: increase version to 2.0
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 11:30:06PM -0800, Andrew Grover wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Valentina Manea valentina.mane...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 09:16:39PM +0200, Valentina Manea wrote: -AC_INIT([usbip-utils], [1.1.1], [linux-...@vger.kernel.org]) +AC_INIT([usbip-utils], [2.0], [linux-...@vger.kernel.org]) Why? What does this mean? What warrents the version change? Why have a version at all? This was part of an effort to refresh USB/IP by moving userspace out of kernel.git. Since some major changes have been made (libudev migration), Andy (cc'ed) and me thought it was worth to be promoted to version 2.0. (sorry, resending in plain text mode so vger doesn't bounce (curse you gmail :-)) Valentina did considerable work in moving usbip-utils from using the defunct libsysfs to libudev (well, part of systemd now it seems.) so some version bump seems appropriate, why not to 2.0? esp. as a heads-up to pkg maintainers - btw usbip-utils is already packaged for Debian, and I could probably see it in Fedora too, why not. As to why have a version at all, this is of course tied to whether usbip-utils will ever emerge from the belly of the whale and return to its own home. I think it should someday, if the concerns about long-term maintenance and interface stability can be addressed to your satisfaction. It would be considerable work to integrate it into the kernel build, and would need to be undone if it ever left kernel.git. One big confusion this patch caused, is that it showed up on its own before the libudev rewrite in my inbox. So all I see is this patch incrementing the version for no real reason. Valentina, please always order all of your patches so I know which order in which to apply them in. I see a bunch of follow-on patches after your larger series, what order should they be applied in? Can you just resend _all_ of these, and number them in the correct order in which they need to be applied in, so I know exactly what to do here? thanks, greg k-h ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] staging: usbip: userspace: increase version to 2.0
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 09:16:39PM +0200, Valentina Manea wrote: Signed-off-by: Valentina Manea valentina.mane...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/usbip/userspace/configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/usbip/userspace/configure.ac b/drivers/staging/usbip/userspace/configure.ac index 25bf160..607d05c 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/usbip/userspace/configure.ac +++ b/drivers/staging/usbip/userspace/configure.ac @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ dnl Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script. AC_PREREQ(2.59) -AC_INIT([usbip-utils], [1.1.1], [linux-...@vger.kernel.org]) +AC_INIT([usbip-utils], [2.0], [linux-...@vger.kernel.org]) Why? What does this mean? What warrents the version change? Why have a version at all? thanks, greg k-h This was part of an effort to refresh USB/IP by moving userspace out of kernel.git. Since some major changes have been made (libudev migration), Andy (cc'ed) and me thought it was worth to be promoted to version 2.0. Thanks, Valentina ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
[PATCH] staging: usbip: userspace: increase version to 2.0
Signed-off-by: Valentina Manea valentina.mane...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/usbip/userspace/configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/usbip/userspace/configure.ac b/drivers/staging/usbip/userspace/configure.ac index 25bf160..607d05c 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/usbip/userspace/configure.ac +++ b/drivers/staging/usbip/userspace/configure.ac @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ dnl Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script. AC_PREREQ(2.59) -AC_INIT([usbip-utils], [1.1.1], [linux-...@vger.kernel.org]) +AC_INIT([usbip-utils], [2.0], [linux-...@vger.kernel.org]) AC_DEFINE([USBIP_VERSION], [0x0111], [binary-coded decimal version number]) CURRENT=0 -- 1.8.1.2 ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Re: [PATCH] staging: usbip: userspace: increase version to 2.0
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 09:16:39PM +0200, Valentina Manea wrote: Signed-off-by: Valentina Manea valentina.mane...@gmail.com --- drivers/staging/usbip/userspace/configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/usbip/userspace/configure.ac b/drivers/staging/usbip/userspace/configure.ac index 25bf160..607d05c 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/usbip/userspace/configure.ac +++ b/drivers/staging/usbip/userspace/configure.ac @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ dnl Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script. AC_PREREQ(2.59) -AC_INIT([usbip-utils], [1.1.1], [linux-...@vger.kernel.org]) +AC_INIT([usbip-utils], [2.0], [linux-...@vger.kernel.org]) Why? What does this mean? What warrents the version change? Why have a version at all? thanks, greg k-h ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
