Hi Vatsala,
On 4/26/19 3:43 AM, Vatsala Narang wrote:
> Replace explicitely with explicitly to get rid of checkpatch warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vatsala Narang
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> -added this patch to patchset to fix spelling mistake.
>
When you create a series, it is a good thing to include a cover letter,
in particular in cases like this, in which there is no v1 of this
patch. Notice that you have just created a v2 of a previously
non-existent series. This can create confusion for maintainers
were you addressing a more complex task.
I might be a bit picky here, but be sure that any extra time you
invest in the first stages as a kernel contributor will pay off
in the future. :)
Anyway, here is my
Acked-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
for both patches.
Thanks and keep contributing.
--
Gustavo
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_wx.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_wx.c
> b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_wx.c
> index 2044ae27b973..9631331b79d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_wx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_wx.c
> @@ -396,7 +396,8 @@ int ieee80211_wx_set_encode(struct ieee80211_device *ieee,
> (*crypt)->priv);
> sec.flags |= BIT(key);
> /* This ensures a key will be activated if no key is
> - * explicitely set */
> + * explicitly set
> + */
> if (key == sec.active_key)
> sec.flags |= SEC_ACTIVE_KEY;
> ieee->tx_keyidx = key;
>
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
