RE: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl

2019-01-14 Thread Zengtao (B)
>-Original Message-
>From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
>Sent: Friday, January 04, 2019 9:53 AM
>To: Zengtao (B) ; sumit.sem...@linaro.org
>Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve Hjønnevåg
>; Todd Kjos ; Martijn Coenen
>; Joel Fernandes ;
>de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
>linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl
>
>On 1/3/19 5:42 PM, Zengtao (B) wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2019 6:31 AM
>>> To: Zengtao (B) ;
>sumit.sem...@linaro.org
>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve
>Hjønnevåg
>>> ; Todd Kjos ; Martijn
>Coenen
>>> ; Joel Fernandes ;
>>> de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
>>> linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update
>>> ioctl
>>>
>>> On 12/23/18 6:47 PM, Zengtao (B) wrote:
>>>> Hi laura:
>>>>
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 4:50 AM
>>>>> To: Zengtao (B) ;
>>> sumit.sem...@linaro.org
>>>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve
>>> Hjønnevåg
>>>>> ; Todd Kjos ; Martijn
>>> Coenen
>>>>> ; Joel Fernandes ;
>>>>> de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
>>>>> linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update
>>>>> ioctl
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/19/18 5:39 PM, Zengtao (B) wrote:
>>>>>> Hi laura:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 2:10 AM
>>>>>>> To: Zengtao (B) ;
>>>>> sumit.sem...@linaro.org
>>>>>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve
>>>>> Hjønnevåg
>>>>>>> ; Todd Kjos ; Martijn
>>>>> Coenen
>>>>>>> ; Joel Fernandes ;
>>>>>>> de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
>>>>>>> linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag
>>>>>>> update ioctl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/19/18 9:19 AM, Zeng Tao wrote:
>>>>>>>> In some usecases, the buffer cached attribute is not determined
>>>>>>>> at allocation time, it's determined just before the real cpu
>mapping.
>>>>>>>> And from the memory view of point, a buffer should not have
>the
>>>>>>> cached
>>>>>>>> attribute util is really mapped by the cpu. So in this patch, we
>>>>>>>> introduced the new ioctl command to target the requirement.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is racy and error prone. Can you explain more what problem
>>> you
>>>>>>> are trying to solve?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My use case is like this:
>>>>>> 1.  There are two process A and B, A takes case of ion buffer
>>>>>> allocation,
>>>>> and
>>>>>> pass the buffer fd to B, then B maps and uses it.
>>>>>> 2.  Process B need to map the buffer with different cached
>>>>>> attribute for different use case, for example, if the buffer is
>>>>>> used for pure software algorithm, then we need to map it as
>>>>>> cached, otherwise non-cached, and B needs to deal with both
>cases.
>>>>>> And unfortunately the mmap syscall takes no cached flags and we
>>>>>> can't decide the cache attribute when we are doing the mmap, so I
>>>>>> introduce new the ioctl even though I think the solution is not as
>>> good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the explanation, this was about the use case I expected.
>>>>> I'm pretty sure I had this exact problem once upon a time and we
>>>>> didn't come up with a sol

Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl

2019-01-03 Thread Laura Abbott

On 1/3/19 5:42 PM, Zengtao (B) wrote:

-Original Message-
From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2019 6:31 AM
To: Zengtao (B) ; sumit.sem...@linaro.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve Hjønnevåg
; Todd Kjos ; Martijn Coenen
; Joel Fernandes ;
de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl

On 12/23/18 6:47 PM, Zengtao (B) wrote:

Hi laura:


-Original Message-
From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 4:50 AM
To: Zengtao (B) ;

sumit.sem...@linaro.org

Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve

Hjønnevåg

; Todd Kjos ; Martijn

Coenen

; Joel Fernandes ;
de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update
ioctl

On 12/19/18 5:39 PM, Zengtao (B) wrote:

Hi laura:


-Original Message-
From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 2:10 AM
To: Zengtao (B) ;

sumit.sem...@linaro.org

Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve

Hjønnevåg

; Todd Kjos ; Martijn

Coenen

; Joel Fernandes ;
de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update
ioctl

On 12/19/18 9:19 AM, Zeng Tao wrote:

In some usecases, the buffer cached attribute is not determined at
allocation time, it's determined just before the real cpu mapping.
And from the memory view of point, a buffer should not have the

cached

attribute util is really mapped by the cpu. So in this patch, we
introduced the new ioctl command to target the requirement.



This is racy and error prone. Can you explain more what problem

you

are trying to solve?


My use case is like this:
1.  There are two process A and B, A takes case of ion buffer
allocation,

and

pass the buffer fd to B, then B maps and uses it.
2.  Process B need to map the buffer with different cached attribute
for different use case, for example, if the buffer is used for pure
software algorithm, then we need to map it as cached, otherwise
non-cached, and B needs to deal with both cases.
And unfortunately the mmap syscall takes no cached flags and we
can't decide the cache attribute when we are doing the mmap, so I
introduce new the ioctl even though I think the solution is not as

good.





Thanks for the explanation, this was about the use case I expected.
I'm pretty sure I had this exact problem once upon a time and we
didn't come up with a solution. I'd still like to get rid of uncached
buffers in general and just use cached buffers (see
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/201
8-N
ovember/128842.html)
What's your usecase for uncached buffers?


Some buffers are only used by HW, in this case, we tend to use

uncached buffers.

But sometimes the SW need to read few buffer contents for debug
purpose and no synchronization is needed.



If this is primarily for debug, that's not really a compelling reason to
support uncached buffers. It's incredibly difficult to do uncached buffers
correctly I'd rather spend effort on making the cached use cases work
better.


No, not only for debug, I meant if the buffers are uncached, the SW will only 
mmap
them for debug or even don't need to mmap them.
So for the two kinds of buffers:
1.  uncached: only the HW need to access it, the SW don't need to mmap it or 
just for debug.
2.  cached: both the HW and the SW need to access it.
The ION is designed as a generalized memory manager, I think we should cover as 
many
requirements as we can in the ION design, so I 'd rather that we keep the 
uncached support.
And I don’t quite understand the difficulty you mentioned to support the 
uncached buffers, would
you explain a little more about it.



We end up with aliasing problems. Each kernel page still has a cached
mapping so it's very difficult to keep the two mappings in sync.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181120164636.jcw7li2uaa3cmwc3@DESKTOP-E1NTVVP.localdomain/
This thread does a better job of explaining the problem and the
objections to uncached buffers.

And if the software never touches the buffer, why does it
matter if the buffer is uncached?

Laura


Thanks
Zengtao








Signed-off-by: Zeng Tao 
---
 drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c |  4 
 drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c   | 17

+

 drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h   |  1 +
 drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h  | 22

++

 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
index a8d3cc4..60bb702 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c

RE: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl

2019-01-03 Thread Zengtao (B)
>-Original Message-
>From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
>Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2019 6:31 AM
>To: Zengtao (B) ; sumit.sem...@linaro.org
>Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve Hjønnevåg
>; Todd Kjos ; Martijn Coenen
>; Joel Fernandes ;
>de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
>linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl
>
>On 12/23/18 6:47 PM, Zengtao (B) wrote:
>> Hi laura:
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 4:50 AM
>>> To: Zengtao (B) ;
>sumit.sem...@linaro.org
>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve
>Hjønnevåg
>>> ; Todd Kjos ; Martijn
>Coenen
>>> ; Joel Fernandes ;
>>> de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
>>> linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update
>>> ioctl
>>>
>>> On 12/19/18 5:39 PM, Zengtao (B) wrote:
>>>> Hi laura:
>>>>
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 2:10 AM
>>>>> To: Zengtao (B) ;
>>> sumit.sem...@linaro.org
>>>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve
>>> Hjønnevåg
>>>>> ; Todd Kjos ; Martijn
>>> Coenen
>>>>> ; Joel Fernandes ;
>>>>> de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
>>>>> linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update
>>>>> ioctl
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/19/18 9:19 AM, Zeng Tao wrote:
>>>>>> In some usecases, the buffer cached attribute is not determined at
>>>>>> allocation time, it's determined just before the real cpu mapping.
>>>>>> And from the memory view of point, a buffer should not have the
>>>>> cached
>>>>>> attribute util is really mapped by the cpu. So in this patch, we
>>>>>> introduced the new ioctl command to target the requirement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is racy and error prone. Can you explain more what problem
>you
>>>>> are trying to solve?
>>>>
>>>> My use case is like this:
>>>> 1.  There are two process A and B, A takes case of ion buffer
>>>> allocation,
>>> and
>>>>pass the buffer fd to B, then B maps and uses it.
>>>> 2.  Process B need to map the buffer with different cached attribute
>>>> for different use case, for example, if the buffer is used for pure
>>>> software algorithm, then we need to map it as cached, otherwise
>>>> non-cached, and B needs to deal with both cases.
>>>> And unfortunately the mmap syscall takes no cached flags and we
>>>> can't decide the cache attribute when we are doing the mmap, so I
>>>> introduce new the ioctl even though I think the solution is not as
>good.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the explanation, this was about the use case I expected.
>>> I'm pretty sure I had this exact problem once upon a time and we
>>> didn't come up with a solution. I'd still like to get rid of uncached
>>> buffers in general and just use cached buffers (see
>>> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/201
>>> 8-N
>>> ovember/128842.html)
>>> What's your usecase for uncached buffers?
>>
>> Some buffers are only used by HW, in this case, we tend to use
>uncached buffers.
>> But sometimes the SW need to read few buffer contents for debug
>> purpose and no synchronization is needed.
>>
>
>If this is primarily for debug, that's not really a compelling reason to
>support uncached buffers. It's incredibly difficult to do uncached buffers
>correctly I'd rather spend effort on making the cached use cases work
>better.
>
No, not only for debug, I meant if the buffers are uncached, the SW will only 
mmap
them for debug or even don't need to mmap them.
So for the two kinds of buffers:
1.  uncached: only the HW need to access it, the SW don't need to mmap it or 
just for debug.
2.  cached: both the HW and the SW need to access it.
The ION is designed as a generalized memory manager, I think we should cover as 
many 
requi

Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl

2019-01-02 Thread Laura Abbott

On 12/23/18 6:47 PM, Zengtao (B) wrote:

Hi laura:


-Original Message-
From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 4:50 AM
To: Zengtao (B) ; sumit.sem...@linaro.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve Hjønnevåg
; Todd Kjos ; Martijn Coenen
; Joel Fernandes ;
de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl

On 12/19/18 5:39 PM, Zengtao (B) wrote:

Hi laura:


-Original Message-
From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 2:10 AM
To: Zengtao (B) ;

sumit.sem...@linaro.org

Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve

Hjønnevåg

; Todd Kjos ; Martijn

Coenen

; Joel Fernandes ;
de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update
ioctl

On 12/19/18 9:19 AM, Zeng Tao wrote:

In some usecases, the buffer cached attribute is not determined at
allocation time, it's determined just before the real cpu mapping.
And from the memory view of point, a buffer should not have the

cached

attribute util is really mapped by the cpu. So in this patch, we
introduced the new ioctl command to target the requirement.



This is racy and error prone. Can you explain more what problem you
are trying to solve?


My use case is like this:
1.  There are two process A and B, A takes case of ion buffer allocation,

and

   pass the buffer fd to B, then B maps and uses it.
2.  Process B need to map the buffer with different cached attribute
for different use case, for example, if the buffer is used for pure
software algorithm, then we need to map it as cached, otherwise
non-cached, and B needs to deal with both cases.
And unfortunately the mmap syscall takes no cached flags and we can't
decide the cache attribute when we are doing the mmap, so I introduce
new the ioctl even though I think the solution is not as good.




Thanks for the explanation, this was about the use case I expected.
I'm pretty sure I had this exact problem once upon a time and we didn't
come up with a solution. I'd still like to get rid of uncached buffers in
general and just use cached buffers (see
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2018-N
ovember/128842.html)
What's your usecase for uncached buffers?


Some buffers are only used by HW, in this case, we tend to use uncached buffers.
But sometimes the SW need to read few buffer contents for debug purpose and
no synchronization is needed.



If this is primarily for debug, that's not really a compelling reason to
support uncached buffers. It's incredibly difficult to do uncached
buffers correctly I'd rather spend effort on making the cached
use cases work better.

Thanks,
Laura






Signed-off-by: Zeng Tao 
---
drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c |  4 
drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c   | 17

+

drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h   |  1 +
drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h  | 22

++

4 files changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
index a8d3cc4..60bb702 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@

union ion_ioctl_arg {
struct ion_allocation_data allocation;
+   struct ion_buffer_flag_data update;
struct ion_heap_query query;
};

@@ -83,6 +84,9 @@ long ion_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int
cmd, unsigned long arg)

break;
}
+   case ION_IOC_BUFFER_UPDATE:
+   ret = ion_buffer_update(data.update.fd, data.update.flags);
+   break;
case ION_IOC_HEAP_QUERY:
ret = ion_query_heaps();
break;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
index 9907332..f1404dc 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
@@ -436,6 +436,23 @@ int ion_alloc(size_t len, unsigned int

heap_id_mask, unsigned int flags)

return fd;
}

+int ion_buffer_update(unsigned int fd, unsigned int flags) {
+   struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
+   struct ion_buffer *buffer;
+
+   dmabuf = dma_buf_get(fd);
+
+   if (!dmabuf)
+   return -EINVAL;
+
+   buffer = dmabuf->priv;
+   buffer->flags = flags;
+   dma_buf_put(dmabuf);
+
+   return 0;
+}
+
int ion_query_heaps(struct ion_heap_query *query)
{
struct ion_device *dev = internal_dev; diff --git
a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
index c006fc1..99bf9ab 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
@@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ int ion_heap_pages_zero(struct page *page,


RE: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl

2018-12-23 Thread Zengtao (B)
Hi laura:

>-Original Message-
>From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
>Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 4:50 AM
>To: Zengtao (B) ; sumit.sem...@linaro.org
>Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve Hjønnevåg
>; Todd Kjos ; Martijn Coenen
>; Joel Fernandes ;
>de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
>linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl
>
>On 12/19/18 5:39 PM, Zengtao (B) wrote:
>> Hi laura:
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 2:10 AM
>>> To: Zengtao (B) ;
>sumit.sem...@linaro.org
>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve
>Hjønnevåg
>>> ; Todd Kjos ; Martijn
>Coenen
>>> ; Joel Fernandes ;
>>> de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
>>> linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update
>>> ioctl
>>>
>>> On 12/19/18 9:19 AM, Zeng Tao wrote:
>>>> In some usecases, the buffer cached attribute is not determined at
>>>> allocation time, it's determined just before the real cpu mapping.
>>>> And from the memory view of point, a buffer should not have the
>>> cached
>>>> attribute util is really mapped by the cpu. So in this patch, we
>>>> introduced the new ioctl command to target the requirement.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is racy and error prone. Can you explain more what problem you
>>> are trying to solve?
>>
>> My use case is like this:
>> 1.  There are two process A and B, A takes case of ion buffer allocation,
>and
>>   pass the buffer fd to B, then B maps and uses it.
>> 2.  Process B need to map the buffer with different cached attribute
>> for different use case, for example, if the buffer is used for pure
>> software algorithm, then we need to map it as cached, otherwise
>> non-cached, and B needs to deal with both cases.
>> And unfortunately the mmap syscall takes no cached flags and we can't
>> decide the cache attribute when we are doing the mmap, so I introduce
>> new the ioctl even though I think the solution is not as good.
>>
>>
>
>Thanks for the explanation, this was about the use case I expected.
>I'm pretty sure I had this exact problem once upon a time and we didn't
>come up with a solution. I'd still like to get rid of uncached buffers in
>general and just use cached buffers (see
>http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2018-N
>ovember/128842.html)
>What's your usecase for uncached buffers?

Some buffers are only used by HW, in this case, we tend to use uncached buffers.
But sometimes the SW need to read few buffer contents for debug purpose and
no synchronization is needed.

>
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Zeng Tao 
>>>> ---
>>>>drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c |  4 
>>>>drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c   | 17
>+
>>>>drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h   |  1 +
>>>>drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h  | 22
>>> ++
>>>>4 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
>>>> b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
>>>> index a8d3cc4..60bb702 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
>>>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>>>>
>>>>union ion_ioctl_arg {
>>>>struct ion_allocation_data allocation;
>>>> +  struct ion_buffer_flag_data update;
>>>>struct ion_heap_query query;
>>>>};
>>>>
>>>> @@ -83,6 +84,9 @@ long ion_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int
>>>> cmd, unsigned long arg)
>>>>
>>>>break;
>>>>}
>>>> +  case ION_IOC_BUFFER_UPDATE:
>>>> +  ret = ion_buffer_update(data.update.fd, data.update.flags);
>>>> +  break;
>>>>case ION_IOC_HEAP_QUERY:
>>>>ret = ion_query_heaps();
>>>>break;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
>>>> b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
>>>> index 9907332..f1404dc 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion

Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl

2018-12-20 Thread Laura Abbott

On 12/19/18 5:39 PM, Zengtao (B) wrote:

Hi laura:


-Original Message-
From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 2:10 AM
To: Zengtao (B) ; sumit.sem...@linaro.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve Hjønnevåg
; Todd Kjos ; Martijn Coenen
; Joel Fernandes ;
de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl

On 12/19/18 9:19 AM, Zeng Tao wrote:

In some usecases, the buffer cached attribute is not determined at
allocation time, it's determined just before the real cpu mapping.
And from the memory view of point, a buffer should not have the

cached

attribute util is really mapped by the cpu. So in this patch, we
introduced the new ioctl command to target the requirement.



This is racy and error prone. Can you explain more what problem you are
trying to solve?


My use case is like this:
1.  There are two process A and B, A takes case of ion buffer allocation, and
  pass the buffer fd to B, then B maps and uses it.
2.  Process B need to map the buffer with different cached attribute for
different use case, for example, if the buffer is used for pure software 
algorithm,
then we need to map it as cached, otherwise non-cached, and B needs to deal
with both cases.
And unfortunately the mmap syscall takes no cached flags and we can't decide
the cache attribute when we are doing the mmap, so I introduce new the ioctl
even though I think the solution is not as good.




Thanks for the explanation, this was about the use case I expected.
I'm pretty sure I had this exact problem once upon a time and we
didn't come up with a solution. I'd still like to get rid of
uncached buffers in general and just use cached buffers
(see 
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2018-November/128842.html)
What's your usecase for uncached buffers?




Signed-off-by: Zeng Tao 
---
   drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c |  4 
   drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c   | 17 +
   drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h   |  1 +
   drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h  | 22

++

   4 files changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
index a8d3cc4..60bb702 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@

   union ion_ioctl_arg {
struct ion_allocation_data allocation;
+   struct ion_buffer_flag_data update;
struct ion_heap_query query;
   };

@@ -83,6 +84,9 @@ long ion_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg)

break;
}
+   case ION_IOC_BUFFER_UPDATE:
+   ret = ion_buffer_update(data.update.fd, data.update.flags);
+   break;
case ION_IOC_HEAP_QUERY:
ret = ion_query_heaps();
break;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
index 9907332..f1404dc 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
@@ -436,6 +436,23 @@ int ion_alloc(size_t len, unsigned int

heap_id_mask, unsigned int flags)

return fd;
   }

+int ion_buffer_update(unsigned int fd, unsigned int flags) {
+   struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
+   struct ion_buffer *buffer;
+
+   dmabuf = dma_buf_get(fd);
+
+   if (!dmabuf)
+   return -EINVAL;
+
+   buffer = dmabuf->priv;
+   buffer->flags = flags;
+   dma_buf_put(dmabuf);
+
+   return 0;
+}
+
   int ion_query_heaps(struct ion_heap_query *query)
   {
struct ion_device *dev = internal_dev; diff --git
a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
index c006fc1..99bf9ab 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
@@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ int ion_heap_pages_zero(struct page *page,

size_t size, pgprot_t pgprot);

   int ion_alloc(size_t len,
  unsigned int heap_id_mask,
  unsigned int flags);
+int ion_buffer_update(unsigned int fd, unsigned int flags);

   /**
* ion_heap_init_shrinker
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h
b/drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h
index 5d70098..99753fc 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h
@@ -74,6 +74,20 @@ struct ion_allocation_data {
__u32 unused;
   };

+/**
+ * struct ion_buffer_flag_data - metadata passed from userspace for
+update
+ * buffer flags
+ * @fd:file descriptor of the buffer
+ * @flags: flags passed to the buffer
+ *
+ * Provided by userspace as an argument to the ioctl  */
+
+struct ion_buffer_flag_data {
+   __u32 fd;
+   __u32 flags;
+}
+
   #define MAX_HEAP_NAME32

   /**
@@ -116,6 +130,14 @@ 

RE: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl

2018-12-19 Thread Zengtao (B)
Hi laura:

>-Original Message-
>From: Laura Abbott [mailto:labb...@redhat.com]
>Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 2:10 AM
>To: Zengtao (B) ; sumit.sem...@linaro.org
>Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Arve Hjønnevåg
>; Todd Kjos ; Martijn Coenen
>; Joel Fernandes ;
>de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
>linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl
>
>On 12/19/18 9:19 AM, Zeng Tao wrote:
>> In some usecases, the buffer cached attribute is not determined at
>> allocation time, it's determined just before the real cpu mapping.
>> And from the memory view of point, a buffer should not have the
>cached
>> attribute util is really mapped by the cpu. So in this patch, we
>> introduced the new ioctl command to target the requirement.
>>
>
>This is racy and error prone. Can you explain more what problem you are
>trying to solve?

My use case is like this:
1.  There are two process A and B, A takes case of ion buffer allocation, and
 pass the buffer fd to B, then B maps and uses it.
2.  Process B need to map the buffer with different cached attribute for 
different use case, for example, if the buffer is used for pure software 
algorithm, 
then we need to map it as cached, otherwise non-cached, and B needs to deal
with both cases.
And unfortunately the mmap syscall takes no cached flags and we can't decide 
the cache attribute when we are doing the mmap, so I introduce new the ioctl 
even though I think the solution is not as good. 


>
>> Signed-off-by: Zeng Tao 
>> ---
>>   drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c |  4 
>>   drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c   | 17 +
>>   drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h   |  1 +
>>   drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h  | 22
>++
>>   4 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
>> b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
>> index a8d3cc4..60bb702 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>>
>>   union ion_ioctl_arg {
>>  struct ion_allocation_data allocation;
>> +struct ion_buffer_flag_data update;
>>  struct ion_heap_query query;
>>   };
>>
>> @@ -83,6 +84,9 @@ long ion_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
>> unsigned long arg)
>>
>>  break;
>>  }
>> +case ION_IOC_BUFFER_UPDATE:
>> +ret = ion_buffer_update(data.update.fd, data.update.flags);
>> +break;
>>  case ION_IOC_HEAP_QUERY:
>>  ret = ion_query_heaps();
>>  break;
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
>> b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
>> index 9907332..f1404dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
>> @@ -436,6 +436,23 @@ int ion_alloc(size_t len, unsigned int
>heap_id_mask, unsigned int flags)
>>  return fd;
>>   }
>>
>> +int ion_buffer_update(unsigned int fd, unsigned int flags) {
>> +struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
>> +struct ion_buffer *buffer;
>> +
>> +dmabuf = dma_buf_get(fd);
>> +
>> +if (!dmabuf)
>> +return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +buffer = dmabuf->priv;
>> +buffer->flags = flags;
>> +dma_buf_put(dmabuf);
>> +
>> +return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   int ion_query_heaps(struct ion_heap_query *query)
>>   {
>>  struct ion_device *dev = internal_dev; diff --git
>> a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
>> b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
>> index c006fc1..99bf9ab 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
>> @@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ int ion_heap_pages_zero(struct page *page,
>size_t size, pgprot_t pgprot);
>>   int ion_alloc(size_t len,
>>unsigned int heap_id_mask,
>>unsigned int flags);
>> +int ion_buffer_update(unsigned int fd, unsigned int flags);
>>
>>   /**
>>* ion_heap_init_shrinker
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h
>> b/drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h
>> index 5d70098..99753fc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h
>> @@ -74,6 +74,20 @@ struct ion_allocation_data {
>>  __u32 unused;
>>   };
>>
>> +/**
>> + * struct ion_buffer_flag_data - metadata passed from userspace for
>> +up

Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl

2018-12-19 Thread Laura Abbott

On 12/19/18 9:19 AM, Zeng Tao wrote:

In some usecases, the buffer cached attribute is not determined at
allocation time, it's determined just before the real cpu mapping.
And from the memory view of point, a buffer should not have the cached
attribute util is really mapped by the cpu. So in this patch, we
introduced the new ioctl command to target the requirement.



This is racy and error prone. Can you explain more what
problem you are trying to solve?


Signed-off-by: Zeng Tao 
---
  drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c |  4 
  drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c   | 17 +
  drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h   |  1 +
  drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h  | 22 ++
  4 files changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c 
b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
index a8d3cc4..60bb702 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion-ioctl.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
  
  union ion_ioctl_arg {

struct ion_allocation_data allocation;
+   struct ion_buffer_flag_data update;
struct ion_heap_query query;
  };
  
@@ -83,6 +84,9 @@ long ion_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
  
  		break;

}
+   case ION_IOC_BUFFER_UPDATE:
+   ret = ion_buffer_update(data.update.fd, data.update.flags);
+   break;
case ION_IOC_HEAP_QUERY:
ret = ion_query_heaps();
break;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c 
b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
index 9907332..f1404dc 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
@@ -436,6 +436,23 @@ int ion_alloc(size_t len, unsigned int heap_id_mask, 
unsigned int flags)
return fd;
  }
  
+int ion_buffer_update(unsigned int fd, unsigned int flags)

+{
+   struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
+   struct ion_buffer *buffer;
+
+   dmabuf = dma_buf_get(fd);
+
+   if (!dmabuf)
+   return -EINVAL;
+
+   buffer = dmabuf->priv;
+   buffer->flags = flags;
+   dma_buf_put(dmabuf);
+
+   return 0;
+}
+
  int ion_query_heaps(struct ion_heap_query *query)
  {
struct ion_device *dev = internal_dev;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h 
b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
index c006fc1..99bf9ab 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
@@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ int ion_heap_pages_zero(struct page *page, size_t size, 
pgprot_t pgprot);
  int ion_alloc(size_t len,
  unsigned int heap_id_mask,
  unsigned int flags);
+int ion_buffer_update(unsigned int fd, unsigned int flags);
  
  /**

   * ion_heap_init_shrinker
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h 
b/drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h
index 5d70098..99753fc 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/uapi/ion.h
@@ -74,6 +74,20 @@ struct ion_allocation_data {
__u32 unused;
  };
  
+/**

+ * struct ion_buffer_flag_data - metadata passed from userspace for update
+ * buffer flags
+ * @fd:file descriptor of the buffer
+ * @flags: flags passed to the buffer
+ *
+ * Provided by userspace as an argument to the ioctl
+ */
+
+struct ion_buffer_flag_data {
+   __u32 fd;
+   __u32 flags;
+}
+
  #define MAX_HEAP_NAME 32
  
  /**

@@ -116,6 +130,14 @@ struct ion_heap_query {
  struct ion_allocation_data)
  
  /**

+ * DOC: ION_IOC_BUFFER_UPDATE - update the specified ion buffer flags
+ *
+ * Takes an ion_buffer_flag_data structure and returns the result of the
+ * buffer flag update operation.
+ */
+#define ION_IOC_BUFFER_UPDATE  _IOWR(ION_IOC_MAGIC, 1, \
+ struct ion_buffer_flag_data)
+/**
   * DOC: ION_IOC_HEAP_QUERY - information about available heaps
   *
   * Takes an ion_heap_query structure and populates information about



___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel


Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: add buffer flag update ioctl

2018-12-19 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Zeng,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on staging/staging-testing]
[also build test ERROR on v4.20-rc7 next-20181219]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help 
improve the system]

url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Zeng-Tao/staging-android-ion-add-buffer-flag-update-ioctl/20181219-231147
config: i386-randconfig-x079-201850 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h:22:0,
from drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c:30:
>> drivers/staging/android/ion/../uapi/ion.h:99:1: error: expected ';', 
>> identifier or '(' before 'struct'
struct ion_heap_data {
^~

vim +99 drivers/staging/android/ion/../uapi/ion.h

02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07   92  
02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07   93  /**
02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07   94   * struct ion_heap_data - data about a 
heap
02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07   95   * @name - first 32 characters of the 
heap name
02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07   96   * @type - heap type
02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07   97   * @heap_id - heap id for the heap
02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07   98   */
02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07  @99  struct ion_heap_data {
02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07  100   char name[MAX_HEAP_NAME];
02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07  101   __u32 type;
02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07  102   __u32 heap_id;
02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07  103   __u32 reserved0;
02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07  104   __u32 reserved1;
02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07  105   __u32 reserved2;
02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07  106  };
02b23803 Laura Abbott 2016-09-07  107  

:: The code at line 99 was first introduced by commit
:: 02b23803c6af399473703e26703f74cfff3f22f8 staging: android: ion: Add 
ioctl to query available heaps

:: TO: Laura Abbott 
:: CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman 

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructureOpen Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all   Intel Corporation


.config.gz
Description: application/gzip
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel