Re: [Dspace-tech] Handle server + funky firewall

2007-09-19 Thread Graham Triggs
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 22:16 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On the configuration wizard, i gave the external IP, and sent the zip
 file to handle.net
 Then, I've changed in config.dct the bind_address the external IP to
 the 10.x.x.x 

Yes, you should initially register the external IP address.

Note that you can simply remove the bind_address entry from the
config.dct, and the handle server will bind to all available addresses
on that machine.

G
This email has been scanned by Postini.
For more information please visit http://www.postini.com


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
DSpace-tech mailing list
DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech


Re: [Dspace-tech] Handle server + funky firewall

2007-09-18 Thread E. Stuart Hicks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Well, this is what I had to do just to get it to start up.  The latest
on this is that the handle server starts and seems alright; however, it
absolutely _refuses_ to accept the fact that it's the authority for our
handle subdomain.

We opted to use a setup like 1234.abc where the numbers are our
top-level domain and the letters after the period are the institution
code that we're setting DSpace up for.  Handle.net seems to be perfectly
fine with this less-than-common setup but I'm wondering how happy DSpace
is with it.

Since DSpace replaces the handle.net database backend with its own, not
only does 1234.abc need to be compatible with handle.net (something I
checked on before registering it) but also with the DSpace code.  Unless
I hear back on here, I'm going to post to the developers list tomorrow
asking this very question and, if I turn out to be correct, how soon
they could have a bug fix patch ready.

I think I'll also mention how nice it would be if the next version of
DSpace used the handle.net daemon's API rather than hijacking its entire
backend.

- --
E. Stuart Hicks
Access Manager / Systems Engineer
OhioLINK
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I had this problem while our Dspace was in the internal network.
 
 It had an internal addr 10.x.x.x, and an external IP, that would be
 translated to it's internal IP, to all outside requests.
 
 What was the problem with the handle:
 
 Since you have an external IP you have to configure that external IP in
 the handle.net, but you cannot start the deamon because the machine has
 an internal IP, and not the one you providade to handle.net
 
   To test the handle server i did a little workaround. Don't know if all
 the users agree with this situation, or if there's a better situation,
 but i did the following:
 
 On the configuration wizard, i gave the external IP, and sent the zip
 file to handle.net
 Then, I've changed in config.dct the bind_address the external IP to
 the 10.x.x.x
 
 Then, started the handle and everything was working. The only problem i
 had: When you are on the internal network and you acess you Dspace by
 it's internal IP, when acessing via handle, will go to it's external IP.
 Altough it's untested, you can avoid this by using it's name, instead
 the IP.
 
 Hope this helps,
 
 Marcelo
 
 Citando E. Stuart Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
 We have a rather unorthidox firewall setup and I'm having problems
 getting the DSpace handle.net server to work through it.
 
 Basically, the DSpace server doesn't actually know what its
 world-accessable IP is - it's on a 10. IP and has its traffic
 translated/routed by a firewall.  This appears to cause problems with
 the handle.net service and I'm not even able to home it properly.  Has
 anyone encountered this before and been able to come up with a viable
 solution that didn't require overhauling the network configuration?
 
 Frankly, we would prefer to put the handle service on an entirely
 separate box because this will not be the only DSpace instance that
 we'll be hosting; however, that doesn't appear to be an option right
 now.  Does anyone know if 1.5 will support this?
 
 Any help at all is appreciated.  We have an end-of-the-week deadline to
 meet and this is the final hurdle to overcome.
 
 
 --
 E. Stuart Hicks
 Access Manager / Systems Engineer
 OhioLINK
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


- -
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
DSpace-tech mailing list
DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech



 

 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
 Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/


 

 ___
 DSpace-tech mailing list
 DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG8G/yqmBbivzHElIRAnAuAKCLOg7SARthuca+bfv5wGfj32zOXQCfReeD
9yQWwU6QD2/KxYJBrzRVMwI=
=QDII
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
DSpace-tech mailing list
DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net