Re: [DuMux] Non isothermal coupled exercise
Hi Suzon, line 324 in porousmediumsubproblem.hh is incorrect. You have defined values before. So when writing *auto values = couplingManager().couplingData().massCouplingCondition(element, fvGeometry, elemVolVars, scvf);* you declare it within the if statement. This is exactly what the compiler tells you. Did you also check if the massCouplingCondition also implements the energy coupling condition? Best, Martin On 05.04.24 17:08, Suzon Jammes wrote: Hi Edward, Thank you for you answer, it did help. The code is now compiling (with a warning-> porousmediumsubproblem.hh:324:19: warning: variable ‘values’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]) but doesn't run :-(! The linear solver doesn't converge so there is still a problem somewhere. To keep it simple, I just added a constant temperature in the initialAtPos function in the porousmediumsubproblem and a freeflowsubproblem but it doesn't work. Any idea why it doesn't converge ? I am attaching the .hh files that I am using that are a slightly modified version of the exercises/exercise-coupling-ff-pm/models. Thank you for your help, Suzon On 02/04/2024 16:25, Coltman, Edward wrote: Hello Suzon, I'm not sure if this is really where you are working, but assuming: - the error you are working on is coming from the "evaluateInterfaceFluxes" function, - in porousmediumsubproblem.hh header file, - and you have added a call to evaluate the face-wise flux at somepoint that looks like this: > NumEqVector flux = couplingManager().couplingData().massCouplingCondition(element, fvGeometry, elemVolVars, scvf) * scvf.area() * elemVolVars[scvf.insideScvIdx()].extrusionFactor() * FluidSystem::molarMass(1) * -1.0 * 86400.0; > (taken from the exercise solution) Then there will be a compatibility problem between the call to the "massCouplingCondition(...)" function, and the type NumEqVector. NumEqVector will have three entries (FieldVector<[...],3>, including the added temperature), and the returned vector from the massCouplingCondition(...) function will only have two entries (FieldVector<[...],2>, only evaluating the mass fluxes). To fix this, you can use the correct type (for this I would recommend to simply use the auto type). If this is not where your error is coming from, it would be very helpful if you could send us a bit more output from the compiler error. This is just a best guess based on the line number and error you have mentioned. Best, Ned *From:* DuMux on behalf of Suzon Jammes *Sent:* Tuesday, April 2, 2024 4:01 PM *To:* DuMux User Mailing List *Subject:* Re: [DuMux] Non isothermal coupled exercise Hi Christoph, I was able to use non isothermal condition with another example using TwoPNCNI model so I guess that the problem comes from the coupling part. I assume that indeed the temperature should be taken into at the coupling interface but I am not sure how to do that. Should I modify something in the couplingManager ? Thanks for your help, — Suzon Jammes Researcher & Consultant M sas, Geology by Research www.mandu-geology.fr su...@mandu-geology.fr / +33(0)768692934 Ce message est confidentiel. Son contenu ne représente en aucun cas un engagement de la part de M SAS sous reserve de tout accord conclu par écrit avec la société. Toute publication, utilisation ou diffusion, meme partielle, doit être autorisée préalablement. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur ou par email :cont...@mandu-geology.fr. This message is confidential. Its contents do not constitute a commitment by M SAS except where provided for in a written agreement with the company. Any unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or with the following email: cont...@mandu-geology.fr On 30 Mar 2024, at 16:23, Christoph Grüninger wrote: Hi Suzon, I did not look into the code, so I might guess wrong. I suspect that by adding temperature, you got a third primary variable. The error points out that you are using a vector with two entries (representing two primary variables) at a place where you should use a vector with three entries (for all three primary vars). I hope this helps you figuring out what went wrong. Bye Christoph Am 29.03.24 um 11:14 schrieb Suzon Jammes: Hi all, I am now working from the coupled exercise (exercises/exercise-coupling-ff-pm/models) with a 2pnc model. I wanted to make it non-isothermal so I change TwoPNC by TwoPNCNI and NavierStockesNC by NavierStockesNCNI in the properties file but I get the following error : error: conversion from ‘FieldVector<[...],2>’ to non-scalar type ‘FieldVector<[..
Re: [DuMux] Non isothermal coupled exercise
Hi Suzon, check if the linear system is set up correctly. Reduce the grid size to as small as possible (like 1x6) and check if the matrix contains entries everywhere you expect it. If non-zero entries are missing in the linear system (matrix), you have an indictaion where to look for the error. Bye Christoph -- L'enjeu est de bâtir la France de nos enfants, pas de ressasser la France de notre enfance. [Emmanuel Macron, 2022] ___ DuMux mailing list DuMux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
Re: [DuMux] Non isothermal coupled exercise
Hi Edward, Thank you for you answer, it did help. The code is now compiling (with a warning-> porousmediumsubproblem.hh:324:19: warning: variable ‘values’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]) but doesn't run :-(! The linear solver doesn't converge so there is still a problem somewhere. To keep it simple, I just added a constant temperature in the initialAtPos function in the porousmediumsubproblem and a freeflowsubproblem but it doesn't work. Any idea why it doesn't converge ? I am attaching the .hh files that I am using that are a slightly modified version of the exercises/exercise-coupling-ff-pm/models. Thank you for your help, Suzon On 02/04/2024 16:25, Coltman, Edward wrote: Hello Suzon, I'm not sure if this is really where you are working, but assuming: - the error you are working on is coming from the "evaluateInterfaceFluxes" function, - in porousmediumsubproblem.hh header file, - and you have added a call to evaluate the face-wise flux at somepoint that looks like this: > NumEqVector flux = couplingManager().couplingData().massCouplingCondition(element, fvGeometry, elemVolVars, scvf) * scvf.area() * elemVolVars[scvf.insideScvIdx()].extrusionFactor() * FluidSystem::molarMass(1) * -1.0 * 86400.0; > (taken from the exercise solution) Then there will be a compatibility problem between the call to the "massCouplingCondition(...)" function, and the type NumEqVector. NumEqVector will have three entries (FieldVector<[...],3>, including the added temperature), and the returned vector from the massCouplingCondition(...) function will only have two entries (FieldVector<[...],2>, only evaluating the mass fluxes). To fix this, you can use the correct type (for this I would recommend to simply use the auto type). If this is not where your error is coming from, it would be very helpful if you could send us a bit more output from the compiler error. This is just a best guess based on the line number and error you have mentioned. Best, Ned *From:* DuMux on behalf of Suzon Jammes *Sent:* Tuesday, April 2, 2024 4:01 PM *To:* DuMux User Mailing List *Subject:* Re: [DuMux] Non isothermal coupled exercise Hi Christoph, I was able to use non isothermal condition with another example using TwoPNCNI model so I guess that the problem comes from the coupling part. I assume that indeed the temperature should be taken into at the coupling interface but I am not sure how to do that. Should I modify something in the couplingManager ? Thanks for your help, — Suzon Jammes Researcher & Consultant M sas, Geology by Research www.mandu-geology.fr su...@mandu-geology.fr / +33(0)768692934 Ce message est confidentiel. Son contenu ne représente en aucun cas un engagement de la part de M SAS sous reserve de tout accord conclu par écrit avec la société. Toute publication, utilisation ou diffusion, meme partielle, doit être autorisée préalablement. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur ou par email :cont...@mandu-geology.fr. This message is confidential. Its contents do not constitute a commitment by M SAS except where provided for in a written agreement with the company. Any unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or with the following email: cont...@mandu-geology.fr On 30 Mar 2024, at 16:23, Christoph Grüninger wrote: Hi Suzon, I did not look into the code, so I might guess wrong. I suspect that by adding temperature, you got a third primary variable. The error points out that you are using a vector with two entries (representing two primary variables) at a place where you should use a vector with three entries (for all three primary vars). I hope this helps you figuring out what went wrong. Bye Christoph Am 29.03.24 um 11:14 schrieb Suzon Jammes: Hi all, I am now working from the coupled exercise (exercises/exercise-coupling-ff-pm/models) with a 2pnc model. I wanted to make it non-isothermal so I change TwoPNC by TwoPNCNI and NavierStockesNC by NavierStockesNCNI in the properties file but I get the following error : error: conversion from ‘FieldVector<[...],2>’ to non-scalar type ‘FieldVector<[...],3>’ requested 263 | elemVolVars[scvf.insideScvIdx()].extrusionFactor() * FluidSystem::molarMass(1) * -1.0 * 86400.0; I don't understand what does it mean. Does anybody know how to fix this problem ? Thank you Suzon Jammes ___ DuMux mailing list DuMux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux -- L'enjeu est de bâtir la France de nos enfants, pas de ressasser la France de no
Re: [DuMux] Non isothermal coupled exercise
Hello Suzon, I'm not sure if this is really where you are working, but assuming: - the error you are working on is coming from the "evaluateInterfaceFluxes" function, - in porousmediumsubproblem.hh header file, - and you have added a call to evaluate the face-wise flux at somepoint that looks like this: > NumEqVector flux = couplingManager().couplingData().massCouplingCondition(element, fvGeometry, elemVolVars, scvf) * scvf.area() * elemVolVars[scvf.insideScvIdx()].extrusionFactor() * FluidSystem::molarMass(1) * -1.0 * 86400.0; > (taken from the exercise solution) Then there will be a compatibility problem between the call to the "massCouplingCondition(...)" function, and the type NumEqVector. NumEqVector will have three entries (FieldVector<[...],3>, including the added temperature), and the returned vector from the massCouplingCondition(...) function will only have two entries (FieldVector<[...],2>, only evaluating the mass fluxes). To fix this, you can use the correct type (for this I would recommend to simply use the auto type). If this is not where your error is coming from, it would be very helpful if you could send us a bit more output from the compiler error. This is just a best guess based on the line number and error you have mentioned. Best, Ned From: DuMux on behalf of Suzon Jammes Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 4:01 PM To: DuMux User Mailing List Subject: Re: [DuMux] Non isothermal coupled exercise Hi Christoph, I was able to use non isothermal condition with another example using TwoPNCNI model so I guess that the problem comes from the coupling part. I assume that indeed the temperature should be taken into at the coupling interface but I am not sure how to do that. Should I modify something in the couplingManager ? Thanks for your help, — Suzon Jammes Researcher & Consultant M sas, Geology by Research www.mandu-geology.fr su...@mandu-geology.fr / +33(0)768692934 [M LOGO-25.tif] Ce message est confidentiel. Son contenu ne représente en aucun cas un engagement de la part de M SAS sous reserve de tout accord conclu par écrit avec la société. Toute publication, utilisation ou diffusion, meme partielle, doit être autorisée préalablement. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur ou par email :cont...@mandu-geology.fr. This message is confidential. Its contents do not constitute a commitment by M SAS except where provided for in a written agreement with the company. Any unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or with the following email: cont...@mandu-geology.fr On 30 Mar 2024, at 16:23, Christoph Grüninger wrote: Hi Suzon, I did not look into the code, so I might guess wrong. I suspect that by adding temperature, you got a third primary variable. The error points out that you are using a vector with two entries (representing two primary variables) at a place where you should use a vector with three entries (for all three primary vars). I hope this helps you figuring out what went wrong. Bye Christoph Am 29.03.24 um 11:14 schrieb Suzon Jammes: Hi all, I am now working from the coupled exercise (exercises/exercise-coupling-ff-pm/models) with a 2pnc model. I wanted to make it non-isothermal so I change TwoPNC by TwoPNCNI and NavierStockesNC by NavierStockesNCNI in the properties file but I get the following error : error: conversion from ‘FieldVector<[...],2>’ to non-scalar type ‘FieldVector<[...],3>’ requested 263 | elemVolVars[scvf.insideScvIdx()].extrusionFactor() * FluidSystem::molarMass(1) * -1.0 * 86400.0; I don't understand what does it mean. Does anybody know how to fix this problem ? Thank you Suzon Jammes ___ DuMux mailing list DuMux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux -- L'enjeu est de bâtir la France de nos enfants, pas de ressasser la France de notre enfance. [Emmanuel Macron, 2022] ___ DuMux mailing list DuMux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux ___ DuMux mailing list DuMux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
Re: [DuMux] Non isothermal coupled exercise
Hi Christoph, I was able to use non isothermal condition with another example using TwoPNCNI model so I guess that the problem comes from the coupling part. I assume that indeed the temperature should be taken into at the coupling interface but I am not sure how to do that. Should I modify something in the couplingManager ? Thanks for your help, — Suzon Jammes Researcher & Consultant M sas, Geology by Research www.mandu-geology.fr su...@mandu-geology.fr / +33(0)768692934  Ce message est confidentiel. Son contenu ne représente en aucun cas un engagement de la part de M SAS sous reserve de tout accord conclu par écrit avec la société. Toute publication, utilisation ou diffusion, meme partielle, doit être autorisée préalablement. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur ou par email :cont...@mandu-geology.fr. This message is confidential. Its contents do not constitute a commitment by M SAS except where provided for in a written agreement with the company. Any unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or with the following email: cont...@mandu-geology.fr > On 30 Mar 2024, at 16:23, Christoph Grüninger wrote: > > Hi Suzon, > I did not look into the code, so I might guess wrong. > > I suspect that by adding temperature, you got a third primary variable. The > error points out that you are using a vector with two entries (representing > two primary variables) at a place where you should use a vector with three > entries (for all three primary vars). > > I hope this helps you figuring out what went wrong. > > Bye > Christoph > > > Am 29.03.24 um 11:14 schrieb Suzon Jammes: >> Hi all, >> I am now working from the coupled exercise >> (exercises/exercise-coupling-ff-pm/models) with a 2pnc model. I wanted to >> make it non-isothermal so I change TwoPNC by TwoPNCNI and NavierStockesNC by >> NavierStockesNCNI in the properties file but I get the following error : >> error: conversion from ‘FieldVector<[...],2>’ to non-scalar type >> ‘FieldVector<[...],3>’ requested >> 263 | elemVolVars[scvf.insideScvIdx()].extrusionFactor() * >> FluidSystem::molarMass(1) * -1.0 * 86400.0; >> I don't understand what does it mean. Does anybody know how to fix this >> problem ? >> Thank you >> Suzon Jammes >> ___ >> DuMux mailing list >> DuMux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de >> https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux > > -- > L'enjeu est de bâtir la France de nos enfants, > pas de ressasser la France de notre enfance. > [Emmanuel Macron, 2022] > ___ > DuMux mailing list > DuMux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de > https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux ___ DuMux mailing list DuMux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
Re: [DuMux] Non isothermal coupled exercise
Hi Suzon, I did not look into the code, so I might guess wrong. I suspect that by adding temperature, you got a third primary variable. The error points out that you are using a vector with two entries (representing two primary variables) at a place where you should use a vector with three entries (for all three primary vars). I hope this helps you figuring out what went wrong. Bye Christoph Am 29.03.24 um 11:14 schrieb Suzon Jammes: Hi all, I am now working from the coupled exercise (exercises/exercise-coupling-ff-pm/models) with a 2pnc model. I wanted to make it non-isothermal so I change TwoPNC by TwoPNCNI and NavierStockesNC by NavierStockesNCNI in the properties file but I get the following error : error: conversion from ‘FieldVector<[...],2>’ to non-scalar type ‘FieldVector<[...],3>’ requested 263 | elemVolVars[scvf.insideScvIdx()].extrusionFactor() * FluidSystem::molarMass(1) * -1.0 * 86400.0; I don't understand what does it mean. Does anybody know how to fix this problem ? Thank you Suzon Jammes ___ DuMux mailing list DuMux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux -- L'enjeu est de bâtir la France de nos enfants, pas de ressasser la France de notre enfance. [Emmanuel Macron, 2022] ___ DuMux mailing list DuMux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
[DuMux] Non isothermal coupled exercise
Hi all, I am now working from the coupled exercise (exercises/exercise-coupling-ff-pm/models) with a 2pnc model. I wanted to make it non-isothermal so I change TwoPNC by TwoPNCNI and NavierStockesNC by NavierStockesNCNI in the properties file but I get the following error : error: conversion from ‘FieldVector<[...],2>’ to non-scalar type ‘FieldVector<[...],3>’ requested 263 | elemVolVars[scvf.insideScvIdx()].extrusionFactor() * FluidSystem::molarMass(1) * -1.0 * 86400.0; I don't understand what does it mean. Does anybody know how to fix this problem ? Thank you Suzon Jammes ___ DuMux mailing list DuMux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
