Re: [Dwarf-discuss] Question about section .debug_aranges

2023-10-24 Thread David Blaikie via Dwarf-discuss
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 6:09 AM Claudio Eterno via Dwarf-discuss <
dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org> wrote:

> Hi, I'm taking a look at docs.
> On dwarf-2.0.0.pdf I see at "7.20 Address Range Table"
>

For what it's worth, I'd encourage you to consider other options for
address lookup, as the plan at the moment is to remove this feature in
DWARFv6 ( https://dwarfstd.org/issues/220724.1.html ) - and clang, for
instance, hasn't produced these by default for 10+ years.
-- 
Dwarf-discuss mailing list
Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org
https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss


Re: [Dwarf-discuss] Question about section .debug_aranges

2023-10-24 Thread David Anderson via Dwarf-discuss

On 10/24/23 06:08, Claudio Eterno via Dwarf-discuss wrote:

Hi, I'm taking a look at docs.
On dwarf-2.0.0.pdf I see at "7.20 Address Range Table"
/This header is followed by a series of tuples.
Each tuple consists of an address and a length, each in the size 




on Dwarf3.pdf is identical.


DWARF5 is also identical.

Yes, you have understood it. All correct.
David Anderson
--
Overflow on /dev/null, please empty the bit bucket.
-- seen on slashdot.org

--
Dwarf-discuss mailing list
Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org
https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss