Re: [dwm] [ANNOUNCE] cmarkdown-0.3
Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use pre for displaying a block segment of code. Markdown.pl uses precode. I really don't know if I should use that too. I read, that it should be precode, because of the semantic behind it. pre just stands for preformated text, code normally does not change anything in the graphical view of the layout engines, but it says: this is a special kind of preformated text - it's code. I think screen readers distinguish here. That's like the difference betweeen b and strong. meillo
Re: [dwm] Characters still mess up in Xterm/RXVT
Pieter Verberne wrote: So from 'stand' and 'sys' the lines are cut off! This really makes -much- less usable. This occurs both with Xterm and rxvt. (Kai once gave me the advice to use urxvt but OpenBSD does not have a port for it.) At home, I started to use gnome-terminal. I like it. I turned off all decorations, so now it looks like xterm and urxvt: no menubar, no scrollbar, just the text. Kai
Re: [dwm] Characters still mess up in Xterm/RXVT
Kai Grossjohann dixit (2007-12-14, 10:13): So from 'stand' and 'sys' the lines are cut off! This really makes -much- less usable. This occurs both with Xterm and rxvt. (Kai once gave me the advice to use urxvt but OpenBSD does not have a port for it.) At home, I started to use gnome-terminal. I like it. I turned off all decorations, so now it looks like xterm and urxvt: no menubar, no scrollbar, just the text. Gnome-terminal seems to be a bit heavy on dependencies. I rid my system of most KDE/Gnome stuff (with the exception of kdelibs+k3b and gucharmap), the only apps from these environments I find somewhat useful Best, -- [a] signature.asc Description: Podpis cyfrowy :: Digital signature
Re: [dwm] [ANNOUNCE] cmarkdown-0.3
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 09:37:58AM +0100, Sebastian A. Liem wrote: What's bad about markdown? I've got minimal experience with it, it was cmarkdown that got me interested in txt2html converters. Little related ..but maybe this project may interest you: http://news.nopcode.org/miau/pvc.cgi?prj=xml2doc http://news.nopcode.org/miau/pvc.cgi?prj=rss2html Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use pre for displaying a block segment of code. Markdown.pl uses precode. I really don't know if I should use that too. I agree with meillo, it should be precode. More semantically correct. -- Sebastian A. Liem http://www.liem.se/
Re: [dwm] Characters still mess up in Xterm/RXVT
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:19:55AM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote: Kai Grossjohann dixit (2007-12-14, 10:13): So from 'stand' and 'sys' the lines are cut off! This really makes -much- less usable. This occurs both with Xterm and rxvt. (Kai once gave me the advice to use urxvt but OpenBSD does not have a port for it.) At home, I started to use gnome-terminal. I like it. I turned off all decorations, so now it looks like xterm and urxvt: no menubar, no scrollbar, just the text. Gnome-terminal seems to be a bit heavy on dependencies. I rid my system of most KDE/Gnome stuff (with the exception of kdelibs+k3b and gucharmap), the only apps from these environments I find somewhat useful I don't like the dependencies either. For me it is pretty important that software is not any bigger (contain more code) than necessary. (webbrowsers are my biggest irritation.)
Re: [dwm] Characters still mess up in Xterm/RXVT
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 02:30:22PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote: Yeah, webbrowsers are a major problem. I really love the vimperator extension for firefox, but can't stand firefox... Otherwise I think Opera is the best (or rather the least bad) choice currently (even though there are major annoyances both in the 9.2x and the pre_9.5x versions). I'm really looking forward to HV3 getting somewhat mainstream (it still needs better javascript support and some other things). It's quite usable right now, I use it whenever I need to quickly have a look at the web without launching any of the huge browsers and when a textmode browser is not enough. A few months ago I was browsing the WWW and got irritated again mainly because of the way to navigate the WWW. (Somethimes, I suffer a bit RSI. I also tried Vimperator but it doensn't 'feel' well. I never tried Opera (closed source).) It is very impractical to navigate the web with a keyboard. I do use Lynx sometimes but it is just not suitable for all websites. I was once talking with another student about my frustrations with the web. I said something like this; I hate webdesign. When I browse a webpage, often, I go directly to te sitemap, wich -does- have a nice navigation. From there I start browsing the webpage. I also told that all webpages should just have a tree(1)-like (hierarchical) menu on the left side, without any markup. Pretty much like suckless.org. Whatever, it just doesn't exist. Till a few weeks ago, I found out the Gopher protocol:-) And my frustration moved from the web to the fact that 'nobody is using gopher'. It's hard for me to speak out such sadness... ( :-) ) (euhk, a sgml tag)unrealistic optimism How about writing a new Gopher+ server in the 10 000-SLOC philosophy give Gopher a market share of 20% in about 5 years again? (we should also use another markup language than HTML for hypertext documents) \unrealistic optimism It would really comfort me. Pieter Verberne
Re: [dwm] Characters still mess up in Xterm/RXVT
Pieter Verberne dixit (2007-12-14, 11:13): I don't like the dependencies either. For me it is pretty important that software is not any bigger (contain more code) than necessary. (webbrowsers are my biggest irritation.) Yeah, webbrowsers are a major problem. I really love the vimperator extension for firefox, but can't stand firefox... Otherwise I think Opera is the best (or rather the least bad) choice currently (even though there are major annoyances both in the 9.2x and the pre_9.5x versions). I'm really looking forward to HV3 getting somewhat mainstream (it still needs better javascript support and some other things). It's quite usable right now, I use it whenever I need to quickly have a look at the web without launching any of the huge browsers and when a textmode browser is not enough. Regards, -- [a] signature.asc Description: Podpis cyfrowy :: Digital signature
Re: [dwm] Characters still mess up in Xterm/RXVT
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Pieter Verberne wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 02:30:22PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote: Yeah, webbrowsers are a major problem. I really love the vimperator extension for firefox, but can't stand firefox... Otherwise I think Opera is the best (or rather the least bad) choice currently (even though there are major annoyances both in the 9.2x and the pre_9.5x versions). I'm really looking forward to HV3 getting somewhat mainstream (it still needs better javascript support and some other things). It's quite usable right now, I use it whenever I need to quickly have a look at the web without launching any of the huge browsers and when a textmode browser is not enough. A few months ago I was browsing the WWW and got irritated again mainly because of the way to navigate the WWW. (Somethimes, I suffer a bit RSI. I also tried Vimperator but it doensn't 'feel' well. I never tried Opera (closed source).) It is very impractical to navigate the web with a keyboard. I do use Lynx sometimes but it is just not suitable for all websites. I was once talking with another student about my frustrations with the web. I said something like this; I hate webdesign. When I browse a webpage, often, I go directly to te sitemap, wich -does- have a nice navigation. From there I start browsing the webpage. I also told that all webpages should just have a tree(1)-like (hierarchical) menu on the left side, without any markup. Pretty much like suckless.org. Whatever, it just doesn't exist. Till a few weeks ago, I found out the Gopher protocol:-) And my frustration moved from the web to the fact that 'nobody is using gopher'. It's hard for me to speak out such sadness... ( :-) ) (euhk, a sgml tag)unrealistic optimism How about writing a new Gopher+ server in the 10 000-SLOC philosophy give Gopher a market share of 20% in about 5 years again? (we should also use another markup language than HTML for hypertext documents) \unrealistic optimism 20h did it already: http://www.r-36.net/gopher.php?u=/geomyidae.gph Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe http://www.suckless.org/ GPG key: 0D73F361
Re: [dwm] How to restart after re-compiling dwm without destroying of existing clients?
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:44:19 -0500 Evan Gates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks to all! You can just kill dwm (default keybinding Mod1+shift+q) making sure you have a shell open, then restart dwm from that shell. -Evan On Dec 13, 2007 1:39 PM, Taras Ivashchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everybody, sorry if this question already was asked. Is there way or may be patch to restart after re-compiling dwm without destroying of existing clients? Something like restart feature in xmonad? Thanks. -- Taras Ivashchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software is like SEX - it's better when it's FREE - Linus Torvalds -- Taras Ivashchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software is like SEX - it's better when it's FREE - Linus Torvalds
Re: [dwm] Characters still mess up in Xterm/RXVT
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:55:02PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Pieter Verberne wrote: (euhk, a sgml tag)unrealistic optimism How about writing a new Gopher+ server in the 10 000-SLOC philosophy give Gopher a market share of 20% in about 5 years again? (we should also use another markup language than HTML for hypertext documents) \unrealistic optimism 20h did it already: http://www.r-36.net/gopher.php?u=/geomyidae.gph Awesome. I didn't find that app while looking for servers.
