Re: [dwm] Cycle urgent windows patch for dwm-4.9
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 08:22:27PM -0400, Jeremy O'Brien wrote: On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 03:01:15PM +0200, Martin Oppegaard wrote: Have updated the patch for mercurial tip. I also add a patch which implements one layout per tag. Haven't looked at the old one, so I can't say if it's an update or not. Hi there. I tried your cycleurgent patch, and I like it alot. Only one minor problem. It won't cycle if you are on an empty tag. Not sure if that was intended or not, and I understand people won't typically be on a blank tag, but I figured you'd want to know for robustness and whatnot. Thank you. Indeed it is a design feature. Not hard to change, tho, which I will do while I fix a real bug I found with having mutiple tags selected.
Re: [dwm] Monocle question
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 11:40:32PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/4/08, Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In other words you would propose the attached patch. nice, i like it (except an unnecessary space) I noticed that two after sending the patch ;). Copy Paste in VIM sucks sometimes. Thanks, I applied this patch to hg tip, I considered a similiar solution, but I delay this thought for now. It was about having a nextclient() function which works on lt-isfloating and which replaces nexttiled()... Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe http://www.suckless.org/ GPG key: 0D73F361
Re: [dwm] Monocle question
Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 11:40:32PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/4/08, Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In other words you would propose the attached patch. nice, i like it (except an unnecessary space) I noticed that two after sending the patch ;). Copy Paste in VIM sucks sometimes. Thanks, I applied this patch to hg tip, I considered a similiar solution, but I delay this thought for now. It was about having a nextclient() function which works on lt-isfloating and which replaces nexttiled()... There's something we overlooked (I noticed it already yesterday, but thought someone will notice it). I attached a fixing patch. Maybe you should add a hook to compile dwm before committing. Regards Matthias-Christian diff -r f7a24c410801 dwm.c --- a/dwm.c Sat Apr 05 19:53:25 2008 +0200 +++ b/dwm.c Sat Apr 05 19:54:11 2008 +0200 @@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ Client *c; for(c = clients; c; c = c-next) - if((lt-isfloating || !c-floating) isvisible(c)) + if((lt-isfloating || !c-isfloating) isvisible(c)) resize(c, mox, moy, mow - 2 * c-bw, moh - 2 * c-bw, RESIZEHINTS); }