Re: [dwm] suckless.org stylesheet glitch
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:59:05AM +0100, Uriel wrote: Good point, probably the werc stylesheet should be split and reorganized to avoid this kind of issues, I will think about it. Also, www.suckless.org is *SLOW* to the point of being unusable, and i'm sure that is not werc's fault because http://cat-v.org and many other werc sites are quite fast. Do you use ipv6? It's also a bit slow for me, because I use an ipv6 tunnel from Hurricane Electric. But that's ok. uriel Regards, Matthias-Christian On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:31 AM, twfb twf...@googlemail.com wrote: Greetings, suckless.org currently links to two stylesheets /pub/style/style.css and /_werc/pub/style.css both are active for media screen. The former stylesheet (/pub) uses among other things orange background for the midHeader class. This results in a split-second display of a different colour scheme (werc default?) as the stylesheets load. Posting to d...@suckless as w...@suckless was subscriber only. Regards -- TWFB - PGP: D7A420B3
Re: [dwm] Wiki date format
[2009-03-10 22:57] Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com He's probably talking about the front page, screenshot here: http://bayimg.com/image/caombaabd.jpg correct. meillo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [dwm] C unit testing
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:24:41AM +, A.S. Bradbury wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Richard Pöttler richard.poett...@gmail.com wrote: I just wanted to ask you guys if you could recommend me a tool to unit test my C code. So far I only found CUnit, Check and CuTest but haven't dug into any of them. Do you have any suggestions? I haven't yet used it, but Google have released cmockery: http://code.google.com/p/cmockery/ Thanks. I will give it a try. bye richi -- quoting guide: http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/quotingguide.html pgpyO5mkQ0Iwj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [dwm] Wiki date format
Well, that should be corrected when the frontpage is converted to a proper werc feed, that looks like this: http://ninetimes.cat-v.org/ uriel On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:06 AM, markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de wrote: [2009-03-10 22:57] Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com He's probably talking about the front page, screenshot here: http://bayimg.com/image/caombaabd.jpg correct. meillo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJt3EO6aFpZ+X9qBIRAuyUAJ0ZUisKmAR/NERwDWGUEe8ZRQOwYwCeOV3V 8e5GPmTkuzldlhKkBowWabM= =IYNf -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [dwm] Wiki date format
[2009-03-11 12:47] Uriel urie...@gmail.com Well, that should be corrected when the frontpage is converted to a proper werc feed, That might be right. I don't know about the internals ... I only made a suggestion from the user's POV. that looks like this: http://ninetimes.cat-v.org/ I think you should improve the date format, too. /mm/dd is not worst but still worse than -mm-dd. The latter one is a standard, and it is usable in filenames. Think about it. meillo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [dwm] Wiki date format
On 3/11/09, markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de wrote: /mm/dd is not worst but still worse than -mm-dd. The latter one is a standard, and it is usable in filenames. imho that's the point of '/' dates in werc, eg. see: http://ninetimes.cat-v.org/news/2009/03/06/
Re: [dwm] Wiki date format
2009/3/11 markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de: /mm/dd is not worst but still worse than -mm-dd. The latter one is a standard, and it is usable in filenames. Think about it. I'm thinking about it, but really, if slashes are not the standard FS in dates we are probably living in different worlds. OTOH, a /mm/dd structure is convenient to organize months and years in a tree structure, i.e. directories (as God intended when he created time). -- - yiyus || JGL .
Re: [dwm] Wiki date format
[2009-03-11 16:10] yy yiyu@gmail.com 2009/3/11 markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de: /mm/dd is not worst but still worse than -mm-dd. The latter one is a standard, and it is usable in filenames. Think about it. I'm thinking about it, but really, if slashes are not the standard FS in dates we are probably living in different worlds. We live in one world. You may have probably noticed that there are cultures/countries that use different separators. (In my case it's Germany that uses dd.mm.) However, the dash-separated is the standard that has the great advantage to finally solve the problem of different formats that all use slashes but have their fields differently ordered. OTOH, a /mm/dd structure is convenient to organize months and years in a tree structure, i.e. directories If /mm/dd depicts a path, I agree. Anyway, in this case it's the only way, as slash separates files in a path. But to show a date in other situations one should use -mm-dd to avoid all the confusion the slash-formats cause, to large parts of the world. Standards are to stick to, if they are good. I see no reason why ISO 8601 is bad ... meillo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [dwm] Wiki date format
* markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de [2009-03-11 16:42]: [2009-03-11 16:10] yy yiyu@gmail.com OTOH, a /mm/dd structure is convenient to organize months and years in a tree structure, i.e. directories If /mm/dd depicts a path, I agree. Anyway, in this case it's the only way, as slash separates files in a path. One can use the standard for representation, i.e. show 2042-03-11 _and_ store files in 2042/03/11 ( ... as was the intention when time was invented :o) ). What's the problem? Well, this will effectively result in URLs like http://foo.bar.bg/posts/2042/03/11/date-format-is-confusing.html which may be a bit confusing for some people, but the context (hierarchical structure) should prompt what date it is supposed to be. (if one is aware of what the intention was when time was invented) :o) -- cheers stanio_
Re: [dwm] suckless.org stylesheet glitch
Why have you change to werc? On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/3/10 Uriel urie...@gmail.com: Good point, probably the werc stylesheet should be split and reorganized to avoid this kind of issues, I will think about it. Also, www.suckless.org is *SLOW* to the point of being unusable, and i'm sure that is not werc's fault because http://cat-v.org and many other werc sites are quite fast. If it's slow it's definately werc or p9p, because even the old UML static web server (now sandbox.suckless.org) was fast enough for static pages that nobody complained ;) But I don't think that www.suckless.org is too slow. Kind regards, --Anselm
Re: [dwm] suckless.org stylesheet glitch
2009/3/11 pmarin pacog...@gmail.com: Why have you change to werc? The main reason is I'm not very keen on maintaining a web framework and Uriel spend his last year on this and I think his werc is very good. Kind regards, --Anselm
Re: [dwm] suckless.org stylesheet glitch
On 00:59 Wed 11 Mar , Uriel wrote: Also, www.suckless.org is *SLOW* to the point of being unusable Slight exaggeration perhaps... but it is a little bit slow and was indeed slow even before the switch to werc. Nothing dramatic but noticable slow for such a low graphic website. -- TWFB - PGP: D7A420B3
Re: [dwm] suckless.org stylesheet glitch
2009/3/11 twfb twf...@googlemail.com: On 00:59 Wed 11 Mar , Uriel wrote: Also, www.suckless.org is *SLOW* to the point of being unusable Slight exaggeration perhaps... but it is a little bit slow and was indeed slow even before the switch to werc. Nothing dramatic but noticable slow for such a low graphic website. Don't expect too much from a xen instance. But it's more friendly to the environment than having a full blown dedicated server idling most of the time ;) Kind regards, --Anselm
Re: [dwm] suckless.org stylesheet glitch
On 3/11/09, twfb twf...@googlemail.com wrote: On 00:59 Wed 11 Mar , Uriel wrote: Also, www.suckless.org is *SLOW* to the point of being unusable Slight exaggeration perhaps... but it is a little bit slow and was indeed slow even before the switch to werc. Nothing dramatic but noticable slow for such a low graphic website. -- TWFB - PGP: D7A420B3 I experienced up to 10 seconds to connect, but now everything is ok again here. Could be that there have been some temporary dns issues.
