Re: [DX-CHAT] How do we make better DXers?

2006-08-03 Thread Pete D';Elia





98% of the operators going to rare & semi-rare entities are very good 
at what they do. 99% of the problems with these operations are caused by us, the 
callers, by not following DXpedition’s instructions & requests, callers not 
knowing there own call signs, call area, country or continent, 20 people 
screaming up, lid, or 59 to some guy that forget to check which VFO he was on, 
etc.. That’s what really slows the rate down. 
 
It’s like a child saying they didn’t get good grades, 
because it was the teacher fault. They won’t admit that they didn’t pay 
attention, follow instructions or study.  

 
Most of us, including myself forget that these ops are typically in 
extremely hot or cold climates, sleeping in tents, constant generator noises, 
running to filling generators, using temporary stations/antennas, physically and 
mentally drained from hauling, setting up and anticipating breakdown, sleep 
deprived, constant buzz saw noise of thousands constantly calling and fitting 
off insects and rodents. With all that, they must be thrilled to hear, what 
about 2s you skipped over us, why are working JAs instead of NA, is this an 
SSB operation only - why, you worked eight 1s and only six 2s, your splits to 
wide, can you go to 12 CW right now I need you there, listen for my friend he's 
going to call you next, are you going to use LoTW, etc. by of a bunch of guys sitting in their 
comfortable shacks. 
 
Whoever is going or pay the bills should have the 
final word on how they want to run THEIR operation. All we should say 
to them is; thank you for being there, I appreciate your sacrifice, expense 
and what you're doing for us.  
 
73
Pete N2LM

  - Original Message - 
  From: Dan Zimmerman N3OX 
  To: dx-chat@njdxa.org 
  Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 10:15 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] How do we make 
  better DXers?
  The US call districts are still mostly populated by the right 
  numbers,though this is a good point, especially when taken 
  worldwide.Calling one 1 and then one 2 and one 3 and so forth has the 
  advantageof NOT taking into account propagation (you're not trying to get 
  only1's, 2's, 3's before the band closes)What it does do if done 
  correctly is slashes the pileup size onaverage by a factor of TEN and 
  makes the other 9 numbers very patientbecause they know that in a few 
  QSO's they get their chance.They can, as Charlie said, go get some 
  coffee, or they can spend thenext nine QSO's listening and coming up with 
  a calling strategy.  Ittakes the pressure off. It's less stressful 
  than taking ten or twentyfrom each district as propagation fades 
  out.  Having workedDXpeditions that are using this method, I think 
  it's a great way tothin a pileup.  Since a lot of successful pileup 
  breaking is listeningand thinking, this gives you 9 out of every 10 QSO's 
  to work on thatinstead of yelling into the 
  microphone.73,DanSubscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, 
  problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chatTo post a 
  message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.orgThis is the 
  DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org


[DX-CHAT] YK3R

2006-02-26 Thread Pete D';Elia



Hi all,
Worked YK3R the other day on 30 meter, but can't find any information about 
the call. Does anyone have any information about this call? Probably a 
slim, but thought I'd ask just in case.
 
Thank you,
Pete N2LM


[DX-CHAT] KP5 Approved

2006-02-22 Thread Pete D';Elia



The 3C0V operation had all the necessary documentation and we're also asked 
to leave. That operation didn't have a problem acquiring DXCC 
approval. If the ops from KP5 had the proper paperwork to operate from 
there, then the operation should be valid for DXCC.
 
73,
Pete N2LM