[Dx4win] DX4WIN New Version

2004-04-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J. F. Samuels)
I like MMTTY and continue to use it for just the neat RTTY tuning indicator.
I have carefully compared my KAM, MMTTY and MixW for receiving
RTTY, and MixW definitely has the edge, with MMTTY second.

MixW is appealing also since it runs CW, Packet, FSK31, AMTOR, PACTOR
(receive only), MFSK, Throb, MT63, Hellschreiber, FAX and SSTV, as well as
BPSK31 and QPSK31.  I do not use its logging capabilities.

73, John, K2CIB

- Original Message - 
From: Roy Dancy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bob Check [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] DX4WIN New Version


 I must agree about MMTTY.  I operate 99% RTTY and much like MMTTY.

 73 y'all  N4AN

 - Original Message -
 From: Bob Check [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:44 AM
 Subject: Re: [Dx4win] DX4WIN New Version


  Yes, I will be changing programs soon if we can't get RTTY and the other
  fix's  changes mentioned, 2 years between updates is way to long!
 
  73, Bob w8gc
 
  Heartily concur.so many others have done it - and quite some time
ago.
 
  73,
  Joe
  WD0M
 
  At 09:22 AM 4/13/2004, Steve GW4BLE wrote:
 
   Although not a particular RTTY aficionado, it still seems (to me) a
   pity an
   MMTTY interface is *not* planned for the new release, but we have to
 wait
   until the one after.
  
   73
  
   Steve
   GW4BLE
 
 
 
  ___
  Dx4win mailing list
  Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 
 
 
  ___
  Dx4win mailing list
  Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win


 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win





[Dx4win] entering data

2004-04-15 Thread Darrell Earnshaw
You can reduce the number of 'active' fields, and hence tabbing, through 
the Preferences' menus, if you're prepared to accept the defaults for 
the 'not displayed' fields.

Ideally, a tool that allowed one to personalize the main QSO window, 
such as which fields are displayed, in what order, and the formats for 
those fields, would be address nearly everybody's 'complaints'. But... 
to incorporate such complexity (bug-free, of course), maintain it and 
troubleshoot the resulting myriad of possible user configurations would 
be a horrendous. Not impossible, but would probably entail more 
time/effort than the developers can devote to this product. In the 
meantime, we have something which is somewhat configurable, reliable and 
predictable.

73, Darrell


Clive GM3POI wrote:

 What I find annoying is that if I was to have a lot of fields activated to
 be filled in, once I have gone past the callsign I have to tab through a
 load of junk to get back to the callsign in order to change say a letter. It
 would be much better to have the use of say the page up or up arrow key to
 flip back a field or two rather than having to go in only a forward
 direction. And I'm NOT interested in using a mouse if I'm running a pileup.
 73 Clive GM3POI
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Rick Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 1:47 AM
 Subject: RE: [Dx4win] entering data
 
 
 
Only if you worked him before and entered all the data in. 95% of my
contacts are first-timers.

I'll just have to get used to the extra steps of saving the call and then
hitting F10.

73 DE AS3J, er AI3W - Now I have to hit F10! :)

For example, when you work KK3HD, and find out it is actually KK4HD,
the notes for the call, the state and county etc. will be updated when you
make the correction.

Paul


___
Dx4win mailing list
Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 
 
 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win


[Dx4win] entering data

2004-04-15 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
--- Darrell Earnshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 You can reduce the number of 'active' fields, and hence tabbing, through 
 the Preferences' menus, if you're prepared to accept the defaults for 
 the 'not displayed' fields.

I forgot about this one.  I believe the menu item is in the logging window
itself, under QSO - Disable Fields.

Note that if you disable fields, you can't tab into them using F8 to search
(TAB will skip over them).  Thus you need to maintain a balance between fields
you don't want to enter (ie. date), vs. fields you want to search on (ie.
date).

73 - Jim AD1C


=
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.ad1c.com
PGP Fingerprint: D8E2 3D78 339F A7F1 8C13  1193 B5D1 4FB6 79D1 70DC