[ECOLOG-L] Need Trirhabda beetles

2010-08-27 Thread Tania Kim
Hi all, 
Does anyone have live Trirhabda virgata beetles? I need 30-50 of them, 
will pay for shipping and provide all the necessary paperwork to ship out 
of state.

Thanks!

Tania Kim
Florida State University


[ECOLOG-L] Institutionalized perversion of original intent? Re: [ECOLOG-L] Powdermill Nature Reserve important!!

2010-08-27 Thread Wayne Tyson

Malcolm and Ecolog:

I know nothing about the trustees, nor do I know anything about the museum's 
charter, but I do have a bit of experience with other museums and am 
acquainted with present and past (some fired in proportion to their 
dedication to principle) staff members of a number of museums and other 
institutions.


There has been a trend toward populating boards and CEO positions with 
individuals of great political power, but with increasing rarity, any 
significant qualifications in fields relevant to the originally stated 
purposes of the institution. I will not go into a litany of horror stories 
that span the last forty years or so, but it should suffice to say that such 
boards and directors are commonly impervious to persuasion, often as a 
point of pride (a bunch of pointy-headed, nattering nabobs of negativism, 
etc. are not going to tell ME what to do; these people just don't understand 
how an enterprise must be run, and a museum is just another kind of 
business, etc.). CEO is an indicator species.


I will say that once these kinds of ideologies are in place it takes more 
than a few letters to move them. It takes a STRATEGY, and it has to be 
appealing to power if it is to be persuasive. Threats are 
counter-productive, and placation and diversion are almost instinctive among 
such people (they did not get where they are without people skills); they 
will promise anything then morph back into their original forms when the 
crowd of environmentalists aren't looking.


The staffs of such organizations are understandably horrified at such 
prospects and commonly set up quite a fuss, which gains them little but 
makes them feel better (or worse). Often they get laid off. Often they are 
replaced with more cooperative staff, especially those willing to kiss 
butt and screw their way up the ladder.


Interim CEO's can be even worse, and writing them can often serve as useful 
intelligence, providing time and data for counter-insurgency planning and 
execution.


I would get a list of the trustees, get a copy of the charter and any other 
governing authority (Carnegie's original will, statement of intent or 
purpose etc.), and a list of members, even if they can't vote. Many 
museum's do not permit members to vote, this right having been taken away 
by legal (or illegal) modification of the charter, sometimes by making 
associate membership only available to the general public (not part of 
the chosen clique).


If it comes to a real (as opposed to a straw-man) showdown, then, and only 
then, is an all-out fight called for--but once begun must be for the 
duration and fought hard, letting them know that you are in it 'till the 
end. Even dirty tricks of a sort might be required; that's where good 
intelligence pays off. It's a lot of hard work, and it's often for no 
reward. Most people are gullible enough to buy the sweet-talk cranked out by 
the powerful, but enough carefully thought-out  hell-raising, if it comes to 
that, may be absolutely necessary to amplify your power, largely through the 
media. The other way is through the courts, and it may be that there is 
enough shady stuff going on to prevail. Get to the staff (and be VERY 
careful WHICH staff), get them to understand that it's best for them to keep 
quiet and feed you information as part of a best possible strategy. That is, 
try persuasion, then barely evident, subtle implicit threats with any 
connection to the main effort concealed (e.g. public opinion), then if those 
don't work, go to the mat with all you've got! Don't give up, and don't be 
misled by smooth talk--get it all in writing.


Have others had similar experiences? Other ideas?

I'm reluctant to write until I know more about the strategic plan, but 
certainly will once I think it will do more good than harm--not that I have 
a dog in this fight, just because I love dogs, particularly brave underdogs.


WT


- Original Message - 
From: malcolm McCallum malcolm.mccal...@herpconbio.org

To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:32 AM
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Powdermill Nature Reserve important!!


I have recently become aware that Carnegie Museum trustees are currently
considering allowing gas wells in the Powdermill Nature Preserve.

(article: 
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/westmoreland/s_696394.html)


For those of you who are unfamiliar with PNR, here is a link:

http://www.carnegiemnh.org/powdermill/

This reserve in Pennsylvania has been the focus of many different kinds of
field/wildlife ecology research.  There has been extensive marking of
wildlife on the grounds.  Birds have been marked since 1961, and
they have in excess of 100,000 marked at last report.

I cannot over-emphasize the travesty that this decision would bring.

It would be good for people to voice their disenchantment with this
possible decision.

Notice, they HAVE NOT MADE THIS DECISION YET, BUT THEY ARE CONSIDERING
IT SERIOUSLY.

I 

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Powdermill Nature Reserve important!!

2010-08-27 Thread Martin Meiss
Dear Mr. McCallum,
   I can well understand why you would hate to see a nature reserve
despoiled by drilling, but perhaps there is an important scientific
opportunity here to affect decisions about drilling in the whole Marcellus
Shales region and beyond. Has the research conducted at the Powdermill
Nature Preserve produced enough data to serve as a baseline of various
ecological metrics that would allow an objective and quantitative assessment
of the impacts of drilling?  If it seems like the pro-drilling forces are
going to steam-roller the issue to have their way, perhaps you could at
least hold out for concessions, such as funding for future research to
gather the data needed for comparison with existing baseline data, or even
to get more baseline data before drilling begins.
 The resulting information would be very important for other
communities confronted with the issue of whether to accept or fight drilling
plans, and could provide evidence to support their decisions.  This would be
at least as valuable a contribution to society as just looking at how
gradual reforestation affects ecological metrics.
  Martin M. Meiss



2010/8/26 malcolm McCallum malcolm.mccal...@herpconbio.org

 I have recently become aware that Carnegie Museum trustees are currently
 considering allowing gas wells in the Powdermill Nature Preserve.

 (article:
 http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/westmoreland/s_696394.html
 )

 For those of you who are unfamiliar with PNR, here is a link:

 http://www.carnegiemnh.org/powdermill/

 This reserve in Pennsylvania has been the focus of many different kinds of
 field/wildlife ecology research.  There has been extensive marking of
 wildlife on the grounds.  Birds have been marked since 1961, and
 they have in excess of 100,000 marked at last report.

 I cannot over-emphasize the travesty that this decision would bring.

 It would be good for people to voice their disenchantment with this
 possible decision.

 Notice, they HAVE NOT MADE THIS DECISION YET, BUT THEY ARE CONSIDERING
 IT SERIOUSLY.

 I strongly encourage people to forward letters and notes voicing your
 disenchantment
 with the proposed policy change.

 As the reserve does not currently have a director, you should forward
 letters or
 emails to:

 David M. Hillenbrand, President and CEO,
 Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh
 4400 Forbes Avenue
 Pittsburgh, PA 15213
 hillenbra...@carnegiemuseums.org


 Below is exerpted from Meshaka, WE, J.N. Huff, and R.C. Leberman.
 2008.  Amphibians and Reptiles of Powdermill
 Nature Reserve in Western Pennsylvania. Journal of Kansas Herpetology
 25:12-18 (available at:
 http://www.cnah.org/pdf_files/942.pdf).


 Powdermill Nature reserve (PNR) is an 890.3 ha field station located in the
 the Laurel Ridge of the Allegheny Mountains in w...@estmoreland County
 of western Pennsylvania. PNR was founded in 1956 by Dr. M. Graham
 Netting, herpetologist
 and Director of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh.  The
 initial gift of 469.4 ha (1160 a) that year brought Netting's dream of
 a proteccted long-term
 research field station into reality.  The reserve now encompasses
 890.3 ha of mixed
 forests, fields, ponds, and streams located in the Ligonier Valley
 southeast of Pittsburgh.
 Netting's goal in establishing
 the Reserve was to provide Museum scientists and researchers from
 other institutions
 a permanent area for long-term studies of ecosystems and the flora and
 fauna comprising
 them.  In addition to being a wild area for natural history research
 the reserve was to
 provide a venue for natural history eduction.
  In 1961, PNR initiated what is now one of the longest coninuous
 runnning bird banding programs
 in the country.  Herpetologically, a demographic study of the Wood
 Turtle and Eastern
 Box Turtle has been in progress since 1960.  The single greatest
 change to the landscape of
 PNR since its founding has been a gradual succession from farmland to
 mixed deciduous forest.



 --
 Malcolm L. McCallum
 Managing Editor,
 Herpetological Conservation and Biology
 Peer pressure is designed to contain anyone with a sense of drive -
 Allan Nation

 1880's: There's lots of good fish in the sea  W.S. Gilbert
 1990's:  Many fish stocks depleted due to overfishing, habitat loss,
 and pollution.
 2000:  Marine reserves, ecosystem restoration, and pollution reduction
   MAY help restore populations.
 2022: Soylent Green is People!

 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
 attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
 contain confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized
 review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not
 the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and
 destroy all copies of the original message.



[ECOLOG-L] Making Species Co-Occurrence Matrix

2010-08-27 Thread Jane Shevtsov
Is there a fast way to make a species co-occurrence matrix given a
site-species matrix or lists of species found at each site? I'm
looking for a spreadsheet or database method (preferably OpenOffice)
or R function.

Thanks,
Jane

-- 
-
Jane Shevtsov
Ecology Ph.D. candidate, University of Georgia
co-founder, www.worldbeyondborders.org
Check out my blog, http://perceivingwholes.blogspot.comPerceiving Wholes

The whole person must have both the humility to nurture the
Earth and the pride to go to Mars. --Wyn Wachhorst, The Dream
of Spaceflight


Re: [ECOLOG-L] Making Species Co-Occurrence Matrix

2010-08-27 Thread Andy Rominger
Hi Jane,

I think someone may have asked something similar on the r-sig-eco email list
(which is a good resource in general:
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology)

I think the answer may have been there there's a function in the vegan
package for R (http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html).

But it would be pretty simple to write something up in R.  Here's one way of
doing it (if I'm correct in my interpretation of a co-occurrence matrix!).
The actual function (called `spp.cooc') is really only 2 lines long--the
code just looks longer from making up example data and adding in the
comments.

Hope this might do the trick for you!  Note that in it's current form you
would have to give the function a matrix or data.frame of ONLY NUMBERS in
which species are columns and sites are rows.  This could be changed by
manipulating the MARGIN argument of the apply command below, i.e., site.list
- apply(matrx,1,...)

Hope this helps--
Andy


# make some example data
sppXsite - matrix(rpois(15,0.5),nrow=3)
colnames(sppXsite) - paste(spp,1:5,sep=)
rownames(sppXsite) - paste(site,1:3,sep=)
sppXsite# here's what it looks like

# now make a function to compute the co-occurrence matrix
spp.cooc - function(matrx) {
# first we make a list of all the sites where each spp is found
site.list - apply(matrx,2,function(x) which(x  0))
# then we see which spp are found at the same sites
sapply(site.list,function(x1)
{
sapply(site.list,function(x2) 1*any(x2 %in% x1))
})
# the result is returned in a symmetrical matrix of dimension
# equal to the number of spp
}

# here's how it works
co.matrix - spp.cooc(sppXsite)
co.matrix




On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Jane Shevtsov jane@gmail.com wrote:

 Is there a fast way to make a species co-occurrence matrix given a
 site-species matrix or lists of species found at each site? I'm
 looking for a spreadsheet or database method (preferably OpenOffice)
 or R function.

 Thanks,
 Jane

 --
 -
 Jane Shevtsov
 Ecology Ph.D. candidate, University of Georgia
 co-founder, www.worldbeyondborders.org
 Check out my blog, http://perceivingwholes.blogspot.comPerceiving Wholes

 The whole person must have both the humility to nurture the
 Earth and the pride to go to Mars. --Wyn Wachhorst, The Dream
 of Spaceflight



[ECOLOG-L] Postdoc: models and experiments of disease in insect outbreaks

2010-08-27 Thread David Inouye

TWO TO FIVE YEAR POSTDOC - USING MODELS AND EXPERIMENTS TO UNDERSTAND
THE ROLE OF DISEASE IN INSECT OUTBREAKS
with Greg Dwyer, University of Chicago

In this project, we will use a combination of mathematical modeling and
field experiments to understand how host-pathogen coevolution and
induced plant defenses affect the dynamics of a viral disease of gypsy
moths.  Gypsy moth populations in North America undergo boom-bust
population fluctuations, and the goal of our research is to understand
how coevolution and host-plant defenses modulate the effect of the virus
on these fluctuations.  We are looking for a field biologist with strong
quantitative skills, who knows both how to execute logistically
challenging field experiments, and how to use maximum likelihood and
nonlinear fitting routines to fit mechanistic mathematical models to
data.  We do not expect a high degree of expertise in both tasks, but
some experience with each is crucial.  Submit a C.V., two manuscripts
from your Ph.D. or post-doctoral research (in prep., in press, or
already published) and arrange to have 3 letters of reference sent to:
gdw...@uchicago.edu  The ideal start date is roughly 1 January 2011, but
if you are interested in earlier or later dates you are welcome to
ask.   Review of applications will begin about 20 September 2010, and
will continue until the position is filled.   Salary and benefits are
competitive.  No commuters, please.

Greg Dwyer
1101 E 57th St
Ecology  Evolution
U Chicago
Chicago IL  60637-1573
USA