On 28 May 2000 17:25:18 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wen-Feng
Hsiao) wrote:
Dear Ulrich,
Thanks for your reply. I now have more confidence in analyzing my data
with PCA. However, you mentioned that 43 subjects are too thin to obtain
a stable/converge result. This incurs me another question -- how many
subjects are enough to obtain a stable result, if the same set of
stimuli are rated by a 5-point scale? 50? (supposed that each rating
point needs 10 subjects.)
...
The rule-of-thumb is 10 subjects per variable, and that is assuming
the sort of correlations and structure common in clinical research and
many other places. With dichotomous measures, you might need more,
since the correlations are attenuated. With unambiguous structure,
you would need less.
--
Rich Ulrich, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html
===
This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, less thoughtful
people send inappropriate messages. Please DO NOT COMPLAIN TO
THE POSTMASTER about these messages because the postmaster has no
way of controlling them, and excessive complaints will result in
termination of the list.
For information about this list, including information about the
problem of inappropriate messages and information about how to
unsubscribe, please see the web page at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
===