Re:[Elecraft] Faulty resistor pack
Hi Bob, ( and Reflector readers) If you have a look at the Control board diagram, you will see that RP3 is 5 x 47k individual resistors. The one I took out is also correctly marked A 473G RP3 1/2 is used with U10a in the ALC circuit RP3 3/4 and 5/6 is in series with the sidetone cct and U10b RP3 7/8 is with U10d ( V bfo) RP3 9/10 is with U10c ( V Bias-xfil) The fact I can measure it end to end or to any leg with varying resistances up to 93k would indicate it is indeed 100% faulty. I recorded it on the reflector as I don't recall it being mentioned before. I suspect it is a component that has fallen through the cracks at the time of manufacture, and probably somewhat unusual. Cheers...Ron ZL1TW ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
[Elecraft] Remote K2
Due to antenna restrictions, I am thinking of controlling my K2 remotely and would be interested in any advice. I want to run the K2 control software from my home computer and connect to the radio over a virtual serial port via telephone or UHF link. I could use a second phone line or UHF link to get audio back and forth. I currently use N4PY software to control the radio via my computer. Anyone tried this? What equipment would I need? What software for the link? Do I need a computer at the remote site? Thanks in advance. 73 de NA8M John ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
[Elecraft] K2 Audio problem..a different solution
I had a problem with my K2 with low audio as well, after more than a couple years of no problems. I had used many headphone sets in that time aiming at the epitome for me. In my zeal I had exercised the phone plug too much, a call To Elecraft pointed out the cure: it had to be replaced. It felt alomost right inserting the phone plug, but it wasn't switching correctly. The plug itself is not easy to find locally. The folks at Elecraft new the issue and quickly sent a new phone plug. The front panel comes off very easily and the new plug solders on without a problem. My audio problem solved. Thanks Elecraft. 73 de Dave K1OPQ in NH ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Re: [Elecraft] Remote K2
John: Check out http://www.trx-manager.com for rig control and http://www.skype.com for audio. Both work great. TRX Manager can be controlled over tcp-ip and skype does an excellent job with audio. You really need a high speed connection for it to work well. I'm currently running a TS-480 via remote and its almost plug and play. TRX will handle rotor control, cw and will give you full software control of the K2. You will need a computer at both ends as Skype uses the sound card to get audio back and forth. One of these days when I build a K2 I will remote it also. Also check out N8LP's web site at http://www.telepostinc.com/n8lp.html he has quite a few good ideas with diagrams along with some downloadable software. I don't have any connection with the above links, I'm just a happy user. I've been running remote since the late 90's and this is the best system by far. 73, Rich - N5ZC - Original Message - From: John Huffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 5:12 AM Subject: [Elecraft] Remote K2 Due to antenna restrictions, I am thinking of controlling my K2 remotely and would be interested in any advice. I want to run the K2 control software from my home computer and connect to the radio over a virtual serial port via telephone or UHF link. I could use a second phone line or UHF link to get audio back and forth. I currently use N4PY software to control the radio via my computer. Anyone tried this? What equipment would I need? What software for the link? Do I need a computer at the remote site? Thanks in advance. 73 de NA8M John ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Re: [Elecraft] Remote K2
Richard - Thanks for the info. I'd like to avoid tcp/ip if I could because of what I assume is the latency involved. I want to operate a remote radio and yet still want to have QSK CW. Does your set-up allow QSK? I don't have an internet connection faster than dial-up and doubt I could get anything better at a remote site. The latency may be an incorrect assumption on my part and I'd appreciate being corrected. Thanks again, 73 de NA8M John John: Check out http://www.trx-manager.com for rig control and http://www.skype.com for audio. Both work great. TRX Manager can be controlled over tcp-ip and skype does an excellent job with audio. You really need a high speed connection for it to work well. I'm currently running a TS-480 via remote and its almost plug and play. TRX will handle rotor control, cw and will give you full software control of the K2. You will need a computer at both ends as Skype uses the sound card to get audio back and forth. One of these days when I build a K2 I will remote it also. Also check out N8LP's web site at http://www.telepostinc.com/n8lp.html he has quite a few good ideas with diagrams along with some downloadable software. I don't have any connection with the above links, I'm just a happy user. I've been running remote since the late 90's and this is the best system by far. 73, Rich - N5ZC ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
[Elecraft] KSB2 filter, IF signal path impedances, T1/T2 turns ratio
Hi Folks. I have several questions regarding the impedances involved in the K2's I.F., and their impact on the design of the KSB2's filter and matching transformers. I poked around the K2 mail archives and saw a similar question posted some time ago (http://www.ac6rm.net/mailarchive/html/elecraft-list/2003-05/msg01686.html), but found no definitive answer or information. Several assumptions that I believe are true: * The impedance of the K2's I.F. signal path is 150 ohms. The input impedance of the MC1350 I.F. amplifier chip is around 2000 ohms. This is matched to 150 ohms through T7, a toroidal transformer with a 20:5 turns ratio (16:1 impedance transformation). * The impedance of the crystal filter in the KSB2 is 1500 ohms. T1 on the KSB2 board transforms the 150 ohm I.F. impedance to 1500 ohms (22:7 turns ratio, 10:1 impedance ratio). T1 is terminated either by R11 (150 ohms) on the KSB2 board, or the post mixer I.F. amplifier/noise blanker (150 ohms), depending on whether the transceiver is transmitting or receiving. * T2, on the OTHER side of the crystal filter, has a 22:4 turns ratio, yielding a 30:1 impedance ratio (a 50 ohm impedance, rather than 150). * The KSB2's crystal filter is operated in opposite directions in transmit and receive. On transmit, the input is on the side of T2, and on receive, the input is on the side of T1. * On transmit, the balanced modulator provides a proper 1500 ohm source impedance for the crystal filter. R11 provides the proper 150 ohm termination after T1. --- HOWEVER --- * On receive, the output of the KSB2's crystal filter is mismatched by a factor of 3 to 1 (T2's output is 50 ohms, and it is feeding a 150 ohm I.F. amplifier). * The KI6WX +10db modifications appear to treat the output of T2 as being 150 ohms (or at least something higher than 82 ohms, the value of the emitter follower's emitter resistor), rather than 50 ohms, yielding a significant impedance mismatch on transmit. Impact: * Many of the crystal filter response measurements, such as those conducted using programs such as Spectrogram and Baudline, have been performed with the K2 in RECEIVE mode only. Since the filter appears to be terminated differently depending on whether the K2 is in transmit or receive mode, the results may not tell the whole story. Confession: I built my K2 last year and performed the KI6WX KSB2 filter and +10dB gain modifications. The improvement in frequency response on receive was substantial, but I have never been satisfied with my on-air audio quality (despite reports to the contrary). I ran sweeps of the TX chain and found my transmitted frequency response to be around 2 kHz after performing the 2.5 kHz mod. Results are posted at http://www.qsl.net/kd2bd/ksb2.html I put the results of these tests out of my mind for the past 10 months. Yesterday I checked the batch of 82 ohm resistors I used for the +10dB gain modification and found they were all measuring between 120 to 140 ohms! Reflected through T2, this would yield a filter source impedance of about 6000 ohms, a significant mismatch for a 1500 ohm filter. The higher-than-normal source impedance might explain the narrow filter bandwidth I am experiencing on transmit (but not on receive). Before I change the defective resistor, I would like to get a better understanding of the true terminating impedance of the filter. T2's turns ratio might suggest that even an 82 ohm resistor is too high for proper termination. If the KSB2 is truly operating in a 150 ohm I.F. signal path, why aren't T1 and T2 wound with the same turns ratio? Possible solutions: * Decrease the resistance of the 82 ohm resistor to provide a closer match to the 50 ohm impedance provided by T2. * Decrease T2's turns ratio to that of T1 to bring the output impedance of the filter from 50 ohms to 150 ohms for a better match to both the I.F. amplifier on receive, and the KI6WX +10dB gain modification on transmit. Suggestions? Comments? Thanks in advance. 73, de John, KD2BD K2/100 #3563 = Visit John on the Web at: http://www.qsl.net/kd2bd/ __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Re: [Elecraft] Remote K2
Yes Jack, you're right... obviously some kind of encoding is required. I guess you could invent you own, maybe using fsk, but tcp/ip is there and it works. I think he may be saying he wants to avoid an internet connection. I had excellent results using ISDN... high quality audio, low latency, two isolated channels, one for data and one for audio... total security with passwords for connection on both channels, etc. It's widely available in my area, and not too expensive (cheaper than DSL or cable at both ends). Technically you could use a modem without tcp/ip, but then you only have control of one serial port... whereas the serial servers allow control of virtually an unlimited number of serial ports. TRX-Manager also offers an excellent way of running remote control using a built-in telnet server, but it requires TRX-Manager to be running on computers at both ends which complicates things a lot. It has a number of nice features though. Larry N8LP Jack Brindle wrote: The only way to avoid TCP/IP would be to set up a dedicated twisted pair between your place and the remote location. This is a very expensive solution, and I'd bet you really don't want to spring for it. The reason that you really need to use TCP/IP is that it is the only protocol suite that is commonly passed among the internet. Pretty much all other protocols are blocked. The only alternative realistically would be to set up at least one phone line at the radio site to carry the control and data information to and from the radio. The device would have to answer the phone, connect to the radio and start controlling things. There would need to be a separate path for the voice or CW data so that rig controls data would not interfere with it - thus you would really need two lines. Of course, this could also be a phone line which carries DSL. One function of the box would be to make sure that only you can operate the rig, and that the rig does NOT transmit when you are not controlling it live. Somehow I suspect that the other TCP/IP networked solutions might actually provide what you need. There are some pretty cool ones as you are now learning... On Oct 11, 2004, at 5:56 AM, John Huffman wrote: ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Re: [Elecraft] KSB2 filter, IF signal path impedances, T1/T2 turns ratio
John - Just a random thought. Since you mentioned that several resistors marked as 82 Ohms came in around 130 Ohms: Have you verified that your Ohmmeter is giving you a correct reading? For example, have you checked it with other (new) resistors marked with different values, or compared the readings by using another instrument? New resistors will typically be reasonably close to their marked values, and usually about half of the allowed tolerance. While it is not impossible for a whole batch of resistors to be significantly out of tolerance, it is unusual. It is also possible for only one range of an Ohmmeter to be wrong, and all the rest are OK. With analog instruments, weak meter batteries can lead to confusing results. I have fooled myself occasionally by overlooking one of the basics. - Jim, KL7CC John Magliacane wrote: Hi Folks. I have several questions regarding the impedances involved in the K2's I.F., and their impact on the design of the KSB2's filter and matching transformers. I poked around the K2 mail archives and saw a similar question posted some time ago (http://www.ac6rm.net/mailarchive/html/elecraft-list/2003-05/msg01686.html), but found no definitive answer or information. Several assumptions that I believe are true: * The impedance of the K2's I.F. signal path is 150 ohms. The input impedance of the MC1350 I.F. amplifier chip is around 2000 ohms. This is matched to 150 ohms through T7, a toroidal transformer with a 20:5 turns ratio (16:1 impedance transformation). * The impedance of the crystal filter in the KSB2 is 1500 ohms. T1 on the KSB2 board transforms the 150 ohm I.F. impedance to 1500 ohms (22:7 turns ratio, 10:1 impedance ratio). T1 is terminated either by R11 (150 ohms) on the KSB2 board, or the post mixer I.F. amplifier/noise blanker (150 ohms), depending on whether the transceiver is transmitting or receiving. * T2, on the OTHER side of the crystal filter, has a 22:4 turns ratio, yielding a 30:1 impedance ratio (a 50 ohm impedance, rather than 150). * The KSB2's crystal filter is operated in opposite directions in transmit and receive. On transmit, the input is on the side of T2, and on receive, the input is on the side of T1. * On transmit, the balanced modulator provides a proper 1500 ohm source impedance for the crystal filter. R11 provides the proper 150 ohm termination after T1. --- HOWEVER --- * On receive, the output of the KSB2's crystal filter is mismatched by a factor of 3 to 1 (T2's output is 50 ohms, and it is feeding a 150 ohm I.F. amplifier). * The KI6WX +10db modifications appear to treat the output of T2 as being 150 ohms (or at least something higher than 82 ohms, the value of the emitter follower's emitter resistor), rather than 50 ohms, yielding a significant impedance mismatch on transmit. Impact: * Many of the crystal filter response measurements, such as those conducted using programs such as Spectrogram and Baudline, have been performed with the K2 in RECEIVE mode only. Since the filter appears to be terminated differently depending on whether the K2 is in transmit or receive mode, the results may not tell the whole story. Confession: I built my K2 last year and performed the KI6WX KSB2 filter and +10dB gain modifications. The improvement in frequency response on receive was substantial, but I have never been satisfied with my on-air audio quality (despite reports to the contrary). I ran sweeps of the TX chain and found my transmitted frequency response to be around 2 kHz after performing the 2.5 kHz mod. Results are posted at http://www.qsl.net/kd2bd/ksb2.html I put the results of these tests out of my mind for the past 10 months. Yesterday I checked the batch of 82 ohm resistors I used for the +10dB gain modification and found they were all measuring between 120 to 140 ohms! Reflected through T2, this would yield a filter source impedance of about 6000 ohms, a significant mismatch for a 1500 ohm filter. The higher-than-normal source impedance might explain the narrow filter bandwidth I am experiencing on transmit (but not on receive). Before I change the defective resistor, I would like to get a better understanding of the true terminating impedance of the filter. T2's turns ratio might suggest that even an 82 ohm resistor is too high for proper termination. If the KSB2 is truly operating in a 150 ohm I.F. signal path, why aren't T1 and T2 wound with the same turns ratio? Possible solutions: * Decrease the resistance of the 82 ohm resistor to provide a closer match to the 50 ohm impedance provided by T2. * Decrease T2's turns ratio to that of T1 to bring the output impedance of the filter from 50 ohms to 150 ohms for a better match to both the I.F. amplifier on receive, and the KI6WX +10dB gain modification on transmit. Suggestions? Comments? Thanks in advance. 73, de John, KD2BD K2/100 #3563 = Visit John on the Web at:
[Elecraft] SLA Amps
I'm using a SLA150 on my K2 and it works fine. I get about 120-130 watts out on most bands. The auto - band detect works fine, and unlike the cheap-o CB amps, there's tuned output for each band. I'm sure the KPA100 is fine too, but the SLA is a workable alternative 73 John ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
[Elecraft] Re: 20m net
Hi Ray, I tried sending this email a few minutes ago to the Elecraft mailing list but it was considered spam. K2HYD - Ray - VA - KX1 - 608 QNI #10 Ray was really working from North Carolina instead of from his home in Virginia. I forgot to change his state to reflect his vacation outing. But great work achieving 10 check ins with your KX1 in such a short time. Kevin. KD5ONS As I was falling asleep last night I remembered I had not put this into my net report. Sorry but I got a bit busy while I was writing the report and completely spaced it out. I live way out in the country so my ambient RF noise is very low. I will miss it if I ever have to leave since cities are so noisy. That is the reason why I can hear so well. I heard you early on, at least the K2H part and assumed it was you. Sometimes I can hear the East Coast better than either Tom or Bill can. Then I got Gary's help for the guy down in Georgia. That was amazing since Gary should be in bed by then :) You are doing very well with your KX1. I need to consider building one of those for my travelling radio. 73, Kevin. KD5ONS On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:45:16 -0400, Ray Albers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kevin, Just got home from our weeked visiting son, daughter-in-law and 18mo old grandson in NC. Thanks for your hard work and ear-strain pulling me out of the noise on 20 last night. I was hearing you FB, but barely barely heard noises from K1EV and did not hear Tom N0SS at all at all. Setup was a 50 ft wire out the window with height ranging from 12' one end to maybe 20' at the far end, and another 50' lying in the grass as a counterpoise. 73 Ray K2HYD -- ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
[Elecraft] Weller soldering iron station and auto-transformer
My K2-kit arrival is announced, so I'm checking all that I need for building it. I've a WESD51 soldering station that I bought during my journey in Texas: 120 V. 60 Hz, different than voltage we have here in Italy, 220 V. 50 Hz. I'm thinking to use an auto-trasformer that I've in the shack for reduceing voltage: in-220 V, out-110 V. Anybody could tell me if it may be any problem? What about the earth on the line that's relationed to the potential 220 Volt? Is 110 V. too low for powering my WESD51? Thanks for reading me. 73, Peppino IS0YPS ___ Nuovo Yahoo! Messenger: E' molto più divertente: Audibles, Avatar, Webcam, Giochi, Rubrica Scaricalo ora! http://it.messenger.yahoo.it ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
[Elecraft] BL1 Balun
Hi 'Crafters, With K2/100 100w out after two QSOs on 40m overall about 40 minutes the BL1 balun is quite hot to the touch. This is the first time I have used the BL1 with a CF Zepp. Amazing SWR 1:1 80m-10m, works great. I'm thinking I might need to glue a heat sink on that toroid. Anybody done this or am I too much QRO and heat is normal. hi 73, Joe, aa4nn ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
[Elecraft] Kat100/Kpa100 in EC2
I just finished building a KAT100 and KPA100 in an EC2 for a friend. This is perhaps the best way to go if you still enjoy taking your QRP K2 out into the field. Bill's K2 has the KAT1 and KIO2 in the basic radio. Now when it's on the home base, just 2 connections and it's running QRO with a QRO tuner. Nothing to mess with and what's really neat is that the K2 recognizes now that the KAT100 is hooked up and puts the KAT1 into a PassThru mode (basically the POUT mode). Wish I would have done this a couple years ago when I built mine. It has got to be the best thing since sliced bread. I took pictures thru the whole building process to document this build and it's nice to see it come together again and again on the computer. In the next couple days I'll post the pics to some webspace and put a link to the pics here. Gregg R. Lengling, W9DHI, Retired Administrator http://www.milwaukeehdtv.org K2/100 S#3075 KX1 S# 57 Member: ARRL, RSGB, RCA, WERA and ORC ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Re: [Elecraft] Weller soldering iron station and auto-transformer
At 05:46 PM 10/11/2004, Peppino Berria wrote... I've a WESD51 soldering station that I bought during my journey in Texas: 120 V. 60 Hz, different than voltage we have here in Italy, 220 V. 50 Hz. I'm thinking to use an auto-trasformer that I've in the shack for reduceing voltage: in-220 V, out-110 V. Anybody could tell me if it may be any problem? What about the earth on the line that's relationed to the potential 220 Volt? Is 110 V. too low for powering my WESD51? A 220-110 transformer will work fine. Be sure to ground the third (round) contact on the AC power cord plug(NEMA 5-15P, shown here: http://www.stayonline.com/reference/nema_straight_blade.asp ) to maintain safety and the anti-static property of the station. ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
[Elecraft] K2 #4398
Thanks to all who provided guidance and assistance ... my K2 is on freq (easy, once I figured it out), the filters are set (Spectrogram makes this a snap), and I've made enough QSO's on it now to pretty well shake down the rig. Based on my Bird wattmeter, the power output seems to be about 1W higher than what the Power control calls for, but I can sure live with that. 73, Fred K6DGW Auburn CA 95603 ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
[Elecraft] Lithium AAs in K1 KBT1?
Anyone out there using Lithium AA cells with the K1 internal battery option (KBT1)? I originally purchased the KBT1 but sold it before I installed it because I felt that it would be too much of a hassle to remove, charge and re-install NIMH cells all the time. Now after using my KX1 for some time with Lithium AAs it occurred to me that Lithium cells might also be a good idea for K1 as well especially since I tend to use it for portable operations only sporadically now that I have a KX1. Lithium cells are expensive but have a very long shelf life, a rather flat discharge curve and currently are good for about 2200 mah which should go a long way with a K1 especially for casual operation. Michael VE3WMB ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Re: [Elecraft] K2 high res picture
At 07:40 PM 10/11/2004, john wrote... Does someone have a nice high res shot of a plain K2 that I could use in a QSL card? There's a K2-100 @ the Elecraft site, but I'm looking for a vanilla K2. There's a good one on the second page of the manual, which you can download from the Elecraft site. Acrobat will let you copy a graphic, but zoom in first to get good resolution. ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Re: [Elecraft] K2 high res picture
More easier... look at http://www.elecraft.com/k2100/k2100.JPG Le 04-10-11, à 20:03, Mike S a écrit : At 07:40 PM 10/11/2004, john wrote... Does someone have a nice high res shot of a plain K2 that I could use in a QSL card? There's a K2-100 @ the Elecraft site, but I'm looking for a vanilla K2. There's a good one on the second page of the manual, which you can download from the Elecraft site. Acrobat will let you copy a graphic, but zoom in first to get good resolution. ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com === Jean-François Ménard / VA2VYZ / FN45aj [EMAIL PROTECTED] Elecraft K2 #4130 Site Internet: http://homepage.mac.com/jfmenard === ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
[Elecraft] OT: Any midwest CW nets active
I brought my K-1 with me on a trip to Wichita, Kansas. My intention was to listen in on some of the midwest CW nets. So far I've tried the Kansas QKS net, the Missouri Section Net and the Texas Net. Haven't heard a thing at 7pm central time, which is the time listed on the ARRL web site. I have been able to copy two or three QSOs in progress each evening I've tried but, so far, no apparent net activity. Does anyone know which midwest CW nets are active on 80 meters? You can reply to me directly, if you'd like to save some bandwidth on the reflector. Thanks! John Pfeifer - KL0WN Kodiak, Alaska ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
