Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Overall adjustment - and a little bit more ..

2018-09-03 Thread Don Wilhelm

Leif,

The temperature stability of your K2 (after a 5 minute warmup period) 
should be within 20 Hz if the dial calibration and Filter BFO settings 
are correct.


You can easily optimize your filters and calibrate the dial readings on 
your K2.
The 4 MHz Reference Oscillator only needs to be correct just before 
running the CAL PLL and CAL FIL routines.  At other times, it is not 
used dynamically and only serves as a clock for the MCU.
The DAC values for the PLL and BFO are stored in EEPROM and are used in 
normal operation for displaying the K2 dial frequency, the 4 MHz 
Reference Oscillator is not used, and it can drift substantially and not 
cause any variation in the K2 frequency.


The BFO stabilty should be good unless you have mounted L33 in a manner 
where the toroid can move with temperature, and the "Thermistor Board" 
provides good temperature stability for the PLL Reference Oscillator.
If you experience extreme temperature swings when operating, you may be 
able to modify the amount of compensation by changing the value of RA on 
the thermistor board.  Download the PLL Upgrade instructions from 
http://www.elecraft.com/manual/E740046%20PLL%20upgrd%20old%20K2s%20-%20Option%20Rev%20E.pdf 
for details on how to move the RA value.


Your K2 should be frequency stable within a few HZ, but give it 5 
minutes for initial warmup.


There is information about setting the K2 dial calibration on my website 
www.w3fpr.com.


For optimizing the filter response, the only equipment you need is an 
audio spectrum analyzer running on your computer, and a broadband noise 
source feeding the K2 antenna.  Band noise on a portion of the band 
without signals can be used if you do not have a broadband noise 
generator such as the Elecraft N-Gen.


Information about optimizing your K2 filters can be found both at my 
website and at 
http://www.mmccs.com/mmarc/n0ss/k2_filters_using_gram_v5r17.pdf


If you are running a Windows computer and need Spectrogram, it is 
available on my website www.w3fpr.com.  Scroll down on the opening page, 
the links are near the bottom.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 9/3/2018 6:28 PM, Leif Hoffmann wrote:

From: SM4MNC, Leif Hoffmann

  


I have just finished building K2 #7836. A very great pleasure and about a
ton of fun too, and I sincerely hope that this "100% solder kit" will remain
in the future!

My kit was from the summer sale and contained the K2, the SSB- module, noise
blanker and antenna tuner.

Everything went almost flawless: Under Alignment and test, Part 2 there was
absolutely nothing to be heard in the headphones! What now? The problem
solved itself when I found the bag with the surface mount IF-amplifier U12.
The step to mount it was described in the errata and I had just missed that
small detail! When installed, there were no more problems here.

  


I did the initial adjustments, the transmitter and receiver were functioning
- perhaps the filters did not match perfectly, but that was a
"software-problem" to be solved later!

The SSB-unit, noise-blanker, and finally the antenna-tuner were built and
put in the radio, and everything seemed to work as it should. What an
amazing little radio this is!!

  


Two more things:

1. In my K2 there is absolutely no space between the encoder and the
front panel. Not even the best flush-cutter in the world will give enough
space there. I have read in the Elecraft Archives of paper-bits etc. I have
put on double layers of adhesive tape (tape for electrical purposes) with
the advantage that it doesn't get dislodged when you remove the control
board next time.

2. During the assembly there were some very small (in value) capacitors,
that in my kit not were similar to the pictures in the parts list, but
thanks to Stephanie, Leony, Johanna and all the other packers of the
subassemblies, I could simply rely on the number of the remaining parts (no
more - no less) and after a little examination of the parts, the problem got
a solution and as the radio is functioning, it seems that I have got all
parts in the right places!

  


Overall I can say that building the hardware actually were "the easy part"
and I have learned a lot in the process. Thanks, Elecraft!

  


BUT: I have read, and re-read many times both in the main manual and the
manual that comes with the KSB2 concerning the adjustments. The envelope
with the filter crystals for the KSB2 were marked E850006 and 3228-1,
180611. I could not recognize any of these as a calibration number between
3.2 and 3.9, so I used 3.6 as described, and when I came to the filter setup
I did exactly as shown in table 3 - with catastrophic result !! The FL1 -
under OP1 and LSB- were so high-pitch that it was practically useless, and
this is the filter-setting that I probably will use the most! With an
antenna and the loudspeaker mounted I adjusted the freq. to more like 4914.1
- 4914.2 than the 4913.5 that comes from the table. The ideal would of
course be to sweep the filters with appropriate 

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Don Wilhelm

Bill,

Audio - If you are judging from the internal speaker, all I can say is 
"don't do that", the audio is not representative of what the K3 can do. 
Either use headphones or good quality external speakers for a good audio 
sound from the K3.


The K3 to K3S options will not improve the K3 audio.  The new synths 
will improve the RX and TX phase noise (and usable sensitivity) 
considerably, and the KXV3B will improve the preamp selection on the 
higher bands.  The KIO3B is more of an operating convenience IMHO by 
virtue of its internal USB to USB converter and the internal soundcard. 
Worthy of adding if you do not have RS-232 ports on your computer.


If your operation is mainly casual, you will not notice the difference, 
but if you are into contesting and DXing, the ability to "saddle up" to 
a strong station close to your operating frequency will be quite noticeable.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 9/3/2018 2:46 PM, Bill wrote:
In the real world, is that "theoretical" improvement noticeable? The 
improvement I am looking for is significant - not small or incremental. 
Perhaps it is more than the K3 can provide?

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Jim Brown
My uses are pretty similar to Josh's. As soon as they were available,I 
added the new synth boards, and the KXVB board to get the better preamp 
to my early (2008) K3s . Like Josh, I have several good USB audio 
interfaces, including a Tascam US100 and Numark Stereo I/O.


73, Jim K9YC

On 9/3/2018 1:36 PM, Josh Fiden wrote:

Embedded comments. I'm a contester & weak signal VHF exclusively. YMMV

Sent from my mobile device


On Sep 3, 2018, at 1:08 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX  wrote:

Don't shortchange yourself by looking at only 1 or 2 parameters.

Here's the list.  Some items can be upgraded in a K3 to make it almost to the 
level of a K3S.


** Ultra low-noise synthesizer for exceptional strong-signal receive 
performance and transmit signal purity (KSYN3A)

Agree, have the upgrade.

** USB port–integrates remote control and line-level audio, eliminating the 
need for a PC sound card and audio cables

Don't care, no performance improvement.

** Second preamp for 12-6 m weak signal work (on included KXV3B module)

Have outboard preamp. No performance improvement from what I have, yes? If I 
wanted to improve on this I'd get a better outboard preamp or use something 
mast mounted for 6m. However, already running fairly short 1-1/4 Heliax so 
minimal improvement doesn't justify the complexity.

** Multiple attenuators, providing steps of -5/-10/-15 dB

You got me here. Stock single setting attenuator seems fine, but maybe I'd love 
having 3 steps on HF?

** Enhanced look and feel, with new LCD bezel, soft-touch VFO knob

Function over form for me! Decidedly don't care!!

** Lower-Loss ATU option with true bypass relay (KAT3A)

The only time I've used internal ATU is at Field Day. Running LP I use KAT500 
since it has my antennas memorized. Plus another outboard tuner for legal 
limit. Am I missing anything?

** Redesigned AF output circuitry for outstanding speaker audio

As noted only use the speaker for beeps (JT, RTTY, ..).

** Accurate, high-speed CW transmit even in SPLIT mode

I thought this came with the new synthesizer? Am I missing something here? High 
speed CW for me is low 30s ;)

** Coverage of the 630-meter band (~470 kHz), and lower1

I'm more a VHF guy than VLF, hi. Isn't this available with new synth? Are there 
any 630m contests?

73
Josh





__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to j...@audiosystemsgroup.com



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

[Elecraft] [K2] Overall adjustment - and a little bit more ..

2018-09-03 Thread Leif Hoffmann
From: SM4MNC, Leif Hoffmann

 

I have just finished building K2 #7836. A very great pleasure and about a
ton of fun too, and I sincerely hope that this "100% solder kit" will remain
in the future!

My kit was from the summer sale and contained the K2, the SSB- module, noise
blanker and antenna tuner.

Everything went almost flawless: Under Alignment and test, Part 2 there was
absolutely nothing to be heard in the headphones! What now? The problem
solved itself when I found the bag with the surface mount IF-amplifier U12.
The step to mount it was described in the errata and I had just missed that
small detail! When installed, there were no more problems here.

 

I did the initial adjustments, the transmitter and receiver were functioning
- perhaps the filters did not match perfectly, but that was a
"software-problem" to be solved later!

The SSB-unit, noise-blanker, and finally the antenna-tuner were built and
put in the radio, and everything seemed to work as it should. What an
amazing little radio this is!!

 

Two more things: 

1. In my K2 there is absolutely no space between the encoder and the
front panel. Not even the best flush-cutter in the world will give enough
space there. I have read in the Elecraft Archives of paper-bits etc. I have
put on double layers of adhesive tape (tape for electrical purposes) with
the advantage that it doesn't get dislodged when you remove the control
board next time.

2. During the assembly there were some very small (in value) capacitors,
that in my kit not were similar to the pictures in the parts list, but
thanks to Stephanie, Leony, Johanna and all the other packers of the
subassemblies, I could simply rely on the number of the remaining parts (no
more - no less) and after a little examination of the parts, the problem got
a solution and as the radio is functioning, it seems that I have got all
parts in the right places!

 

Overall I can say that building the hardware actually were "the easy part"
and I have learned a lot in the process. Thanks, Elecraft!

 

BUT: I have read, and re-read many times both in the main manual and the
manual that comes with the KSB2 concerning the adjustments. The envelope
with the filter crystals for the KSB2 were marked E850006 and 3228-1,
180611. I could not recognize any of these as a calibration number between
3.2 and 3.9, so I used 3.6 as described, and when I came to the filter setup
I did exactly as shown in table 3 - with catastrophic result !! The FL1 -
under OP1 and LSB- were so high-pitch that it was practically useless, and
this is the filter-setting that I probably will use the most! With an
antenna and the loudspeaker mounted I adjusted the freq. to more like 4914.1
- 4914.2 than the 4913.5 that comes from the table. The ideal would of
course be to sweep the filters with appropriate equipment - which I have
none!

So that now I have all the filters (both for SSB and CW) adjusted "by ear".
I do have a radio that I can use, even if it's not optimal. It's pleasant to
listen to and a couple of good reports "on air" too. I just wonder: How many
of the previous kit-builders have experienced the same problems - and done
what I have done?

 

Finally: How accurate are the settings over time? The 4 MHz oscillator on
the control board is of course the most critical part here. But - yesterday
evening I had the radio adjusted to within +/- 10 Hz compared to my big
transceiver. When I turned on the K2 today it was about 320 Hz high. I have
- again - re-run the frequency calibration procedure, the CAL PLL and now
again the display shows inside of +/- 20 Hz. Can this be a temperature
problem? It was rather warm in my shack yesterday and pretty cold today when
I came in.

The small capacitor C22 is of course critical here! And a small suggestion:
The adjustment would be much more calm if there were two trim-capacitors.
One 8-50 pF(as C22 is), and in parallel with that another adjustable
capacitor on 1-2 pF for the fine-adjustment.

 

Naturally, I don't expect this little radio to have the same stability as my
big radio, with its X-tal oven and that can zero-in on WWV to within +/- 1
Hz, but on the other hand, I don't know what to expect from the K2. Will it
be within +/- 10 Hz, +/- 100 Hz or perhaps +/- 500 Hz? How will it perform
under field conditions? Actually, it is not that very important, as long as
my #7836 performs "as expected". Can you say anything about what stability I
can expect from a K2?

 

Yours,

 

SM4MNC, Leif

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Josh Fiden
Embedded comments. I'm a contester & weak signal VHF exclusively. YMMV

Sent from my mobile device

> On Sep 3, 2018, at 1:08 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX  wrote:
> 
> Don't shortchange yourself by looking at only 1 or 2 parameters.
> 
> Here's the list.  Some items can be upgraded in a K3 to make it almost to the 
> level of a K3S.
> 
> 
> ** Ultra low-noise synthesizer for exceptional strong-signal receive 
> performance and transmit signal purity (KSYN3A)
Agree, have the upgrade. 
> 
> ** USB port–integrates remote control and line-level audio, eliminating the 
> need for a PC sound card and audio cables
Don't care, no performance improvement. 
> 
> ** Second preamp for 12-6 m weak signal work (on included KXV3B module)
Have outboard preamp. No performance improvement from what I have, yes? If I 
wanted to improve on this I'd get a better outboard preamp or use something 
mast mounted for 6m. However, already running fairly short 1-1/4 Heliax so 
minimal improvement doesn't justify the complexity. 
> 
> ** Multiple attenuators, providing steps of -5/-10/-15 dB
You got me here. Stock single setting attenuator seems fine, but maybe I'd love 
having 3 steps on HF?
> 
> ** Enhanced look and feel, with new LCD bezel, soft-touch VFO knob
Function over form for me! Decidedly don't care!!
> 
> ** Lower-Loss ATU option with true bypass relay (KAT3A)
The only time I've used internal ATU is at Field Day. Running LP I use KAT500 
since it has my antennas memorized. Plus another outboard tuner for legal 
limit. Am I missing anything?
> 
> ** Redesigned AF output circuitry for outstanding speaker audio
As noted only use the speaker for beeps (JT, RTTY, ..). 
> 
> ** Accurate, high-speed CW transmit even in SPLIT mode
I thought this came with the new synthesizer? Am I missing something here? High 
speed CW for me is low 30s ;) 
> 
> ** Coverage of the 630-meter band (~470 kHz), and lower1
I'm more a VHF guy than VLF, hi. Isn't this available with new synth? Are there 
any 630m contests? 

73
Josh


> 
> 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Bob McGraw K4TAX

Don't shortchange yourself by looking at only 1 or 2 parameters.

Here's the list.  Some items can be upgraded in a K3 to make it almost 
to the level of a K3S.



** Ultra low-noise synthesizer for exceptional strong-signal receive 
performance and transmit signal purity (KSYN3A)


** USB port–integrates remote control and line-level audio, eliminating 
the need for a PC sound card and audio cables


** Second preamp for 12-6 m weak signal work (on included KXV3B module)

** Multiple attenuators, providing steps of -5/-10/-15 dB

** Enhanced look and feel, with new LCD bezel, soft-touch VFO knob

** Lower-Loss ATU option with true bypass relay (KAT3A)

** Redesigned AF output circuitry for outstanding speaker audio

** Accurate, high-speed CW transmit even in SPLIT mode

** Coverage of the 630-meter band (~470 kHz), and lower1


Yes, I'm convinced there is a difference.


73
Bob, K4TAX


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Grant Youngman
Feed the line-out into a P-P 6V6 amp (e.g., Eico HF-20, Heath A-9x, an old 6V6 
PA amp, etc.) and into a pair (or one if your’e not using both output channels) 
of bass reflex speakers or AR-somethings.  

I did that with a string of pre-K3 “modern” radios (and quite a few vintage 
radios with puny audio output), including the K3 for a while, before a major 
downsizing of stuff.  Worked and played great.  Now I just use a pair of 
E’craft SP-3s on my K3, which work fine .. and are a lot easier to move around 
:-)  I have no complaints about K3 audio.

Since the days of big 6V6 audio in vintage gear (think SX-28, NC-183D, etc), 
radio vendors have mostly paid attention to everything but audio stage quality. 
 Maybe the new output stage in the K3S makes a big difference .. not owning 
one, (unfortunately, E’craft didn't make the new main board available for 
upgrade) I couldn’t say.  But if you pick the audio up at line-out and amplify 
it with a decent amp and good speakers, you won’t be disappointed with the 
result.

Grant NQ5T
K3 #2091 KX3 #8342

> On Sep 3, 2018, at 2:46 PM, Bill  wrote:
> 
> In the real world, is that "theoretical" improvement noticeable? The 
> improvement I am looking for is significant - not small or incremental. 
> Perhaps it is more than the K3 can provide?
> 


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Josh Fiden
I have the new synth boards, since that was clearly worthwhile. Already have 
outboard preamp & don't care about USB since at this point seems like I've 
accumulated a herd of USB/RS232 converters that work fine, plus Tascam audio 
interface. 

I'll have to check DSP board rev. Was there a specific serial number for that 
changeover?

Thanks for the info!

73,
Josh W6XU

Sent from my mobile device

> On Sep 3, 2018, at 8:40 AM, Don Wilhelm  wrote:
> 
> Josh,
> 
> Yes, the K3S has some improvement to the audio in that there is an extra gain 
> stage that distributes the audio gain a bit better.  I do not consider it 
> worthwhile for my K3 - the DSP board would have to be replaced.  There was a 
> change to the K3 DSP board much earlier that added a low pass filter as well 
> as lower frequency audio response to the original K3 audio.  For a time, 
> there wa a DSP board swap program to upgrade the DSP board, but that has now 
> been retired, but you can still purchase the low pass filter add-on.  If you 
> have the Rev D DSP board, it is already installed.
> 
> The new synthesizer will get you the most "bang for the buck" improvement in 
> the K3 RF performance, and the new KXV3B adds the 20 dB preamp for 17 meters 
> and above.  The KIO3B can add the USB interface rather than the RS-232 as 
> well as an internal soundcard.
> 
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
>> 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Josh Fiden
The only thing I use the speaker for is monitoring digital modes where as long 
as I hear beeps, it's all good :)

My operating on CW & phone is exclusively headphones. So, if the improvement is 
exclusive to driving low impedance loads at higher power, doesn't matter. 

73
Josh W6XU

Sent from my mobile device

> On Sep 3, 2018, at 8:48 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX  wrote:
> 
> Here is a link to the K3S as originally announced.   Note that it has; " 
> Redesigned AF output circuitry for outstanding speaker audio" among other 
> added items.
> 
> http://www.elecraft.com/manual/k3s%20data%20sheet_Rev_A2%20.pdf
> 
> 73
> 
> Bob, K4TAX
> 
> 
>> On 9/3/2018 9:56 AM, Josh Fiden wrote:
>> I have two original K3. Wondering if I missed something. The "S" has 
>> improvements to receive audio? Or is this just referring to the new 
>> synthesizer?
>> 
>> Thanks & 73,
>> Josh W6XU
>> 
>> Sent from my mobile device
>> 
>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 7:24 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX
>>> Then came along the K3S with its advertised improvements.  Namely in 
>>> receive audio.
>> 
> 
> 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Bob McGraw K4TAX
Personally having used two different K3 radios and then my K3S, the 
difference was enough for me to buy a new K3S.  Small or 
incrementalnah, very noticeable specially coming from someone 
{me} who worked in professional audio and recording studio environment 
most of my career.  Of course you may have other objectives.   Operator 
skill and correctly setting up the radio parameters is a major key to 
ones overall success and satisfaction.   In fact, one can adjust the 
various parameters where the radio sounds and performs poorly.  That's 
not the radio's fault.


 I'll say the overall performance enhancements and difference is indeed 
a complication of improvements, not just solely the audio.


With a compilation of older and newer radios,  a IC-756pro II, a 
TS-590S, and an Orion at my disposal, they don't stand anywhere near the 
performance and overall signal quality of the K3S.   As to whistles and 
bells offered by the others.toot toot and ding-a-ling.  They 
don't impress me.


73

Bob, K4TAX


On 9/3/2018 1:46 PM, Bill wrote:
In the real world, is that "theoretical" improvement noticeable? The 
improvement I am looking for is significant - not small or 
incremental. Perhaps it is more than the K3 can provide?


Bill W2BLC K-Line


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to rmcg...@blomand.net




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Bill
In the real world, is that "theoretical" improvement noticeable? The 
improvement I am looking for is significant - not small or incremental. 
Perhaps it is more than the K3 can provide?


Bill W2BLC K-Line


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX2 KXIO2 RTC Adjustment

2018-09-03 Thread Tim McDonough N9PUZ

Thank you Don and Richard.

The KXIO2 clock is working properly again. I do not know if it was one 
of the things below or the combination of all of them but I'll share 
what I did in hopes it might help someone else.


My KX2 was purchased used so I do not know if it was assembled by the 
original owner or by Elecraft.


Step 1: I removed external power and the internal battery. Then I let 
the radio sit for a couple of days so the backup cap could discharge and 
things would really be "off".


Step 2: I removed the KXIO2 board using the installation instructions as 
a guide. I carefully applied a small amount of DeoxIT "D Series" cleaner 
to the contacts on the four headers. (Use VERY little, I could barely 
see that I had applied any.) This was in case there might be any small 
amount of corrosion that was not visible.


Step 3: I reassembled everything, put the battery back in and connected 
external power. Then, I used the KX2 utility program to set the clock to 
match my PC with the "calibration value set to "0". I turned the radio off.


Step 4: About a day or so later I compared the two times. The KX2 was a 
few seconds fast so I bumped the calibration to "1". Having done all of 
that the radio seems to be about a minute fast after a week. Plenty good 
enough for me and well within what Elecraft claims it should do.


Tim N9PUZ

On 8/26/2018 11:00 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:

Tim,

I would suggest trying again to recalibrate it.  The recalibration can 
be a long process of trial and error with the results measured over 
several days.
That is a lot less expensive than buying a new one or sending it to 
Elecraft.


I do not expect the long term accuracy of any rig's real time clock to 
be correct over a period of days.  Even gaining a minute a day is 
sufficient for logging during an outing.
Actually, I do not use it, I use the Timex on my wrist for accurate 
timekeeping, and it is easier for me than pulling up the RTC display 
on the KX2 when doing paper logging.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 8/25/2018 5:20 PM, Tim McDonough N9PUZ wrote:
I have a KX2 with the internal tuner and the KXIO2 clock module which 
I purchased used and it is long out of warranty. The clock gains a 
nearly minute per day in spite of having performed the 
calibration/adjustment.


Elecraft advised that while they are more than happy to repair it by 
the time I pay for labor and shipping both ways it is probably better 
to buy a new KXIO2 module which will have a warranty. I can 
appreciate that and don't fault them a bit for the price but I'm just 
wondering if anyone has a suggestion for a DIY repair. I spend plenty 
of money on the hobby but am just wondering if I can get a working 
internal clock for less than $80 plus shipping?




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread RIchard Williams via Elecraft
Josh,
Theoretically, the answer is yes.  From the FAQ blurb on the Elecraft site: 
"Redesigned speakeramplifier -  Stereo speaker outputs now have lower total 
harmonic distortion(THD) for reduced listening fatigue".
Dick, K8ZTT
     On Monday, September 3, 2018, 8:56:45 AM MDT, Josh Fiden 
 wrote:  
 
 I have two original K3. Wondering if I missed something. The "S" has 
improvements to receive audio? Or is this just referring to the new synthesizer?

Thanks & 73,
Josh W6XU

Sent from my mobile device

> On Sep 3, 2018, at 7:24 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX 

> Then came along the K3S with its advertised improvements.  Namely in receive 
> audio.  

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to richarddw1...@yahoo.com
  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Dave Cole (NK7Z)

Don,

I have some P3 displays of what happens when two stations upgrade to the 
new Synthesizers at:


https://www.nk7z.net/

Just select the top blog entry.  There are some P3 graphs there showing 
just how much improvement the new synthesizers actually add.  Two of us 
upgraded, and we did it in stages, I managed to document most of the 
changes in steps, showing the RX station, then the TX stations, etc.  It 
was all quite interesting, and a big improvement as the numbers show.


73s and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z/NNR0DC)
https://www.nk7z.net
ARRL Technical Specialist

On 09/03/2018 08:40 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
The new synthesizer will get you the most "bang for the buck" 
improvement in the K3 RF performance



73,
Don W3FPR

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Bob McGraw K4TAX
Here is a link to the K3S as originally announced.   Note that it has; " 
Redesigned AF output circuitry for outstanding speaker audio" among 
other added items.


http://www.elecraft.com/manual/k3s%20data%20sheet_Rev_A2%20.pdf

73

Bob, K4TAX


On 9/3/2018 9:56 AM, Josh Fiden wrote:

I have two original K3. Wondering if I missed something. The "S" has 
improvements to receive audio? Or is this just referring to the new synthesizer?

Thanks & 73,
Josh W6XU

Sent from my mobile device


On Sep 3, 2018, at 7:24 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX
Then came along the K3S with its advertised improvements.  Namely in receive 
audio.





__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Don Wilhelm

Josh,

Yes, the K3S has some improvement to the audio in that there is an extra 
gain stage that distributes the audio gain a bit better.  I do not 
consider it worthwhile for my K3 - the DSP board would have to be 
replaced.  There was a change to the K3 DSP board much earlier that 
added a low pass filter as well as lower frequency audio response to the 
original K3 audio.  For a time, there wa a DSP board swap program to 
upgrade the DSP board, but that has now been retired, but you can still 
purchase the low pass filter add-on.  If you have the Rev D DSP board, 
it is already installed.


The new synthesizer will get you the most "bang for the buck" 
improvement in the K3 RF performance, and the new KXV3B adds the 20 dB 
preamp for 17 meters and above.  The KIO3B can add the USB interface 
rather than the RS-232 as well as an internal soundcard.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 9/3/2018 10:56 AM, Josh Fiden wrote:

I have two original K3. Wondering if I missed something. The "S" has 
improvements to receive audio? Or is this just referring to the new synthesizer?


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Josh Fiden
I have two original K3. Wondering if I missed something. The "S" has 
improvements to receive audio? Or is this just referring to the new synthesizer?

Thanks & 73,
Josh W6XU

Sent from my mobile device

> On Sep 3, 2018, at 7:24 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX 

> Then came along the K3S with its advertised improvements.  Namely in receive 
> audio.  

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Bob McGraw K4TAX
I had assembled two K3 radios for friends that didn't believe they were 
competent to do so.  In doing this, I was able to use these radios for a 
few weeks.   I noted some artifacts regarding the receive audio and 
elected not to purchase one for my station at that time.


Then came along the K3S with its advertised improvements.  Namely in 
receive audio.  I opted to purchase one and I am totally delighted that 
I waited.  The RX audio performance is outstanding in all respects.   I 
know this is not the answer you wanted to read.   However, Don, W3FPR 
has an excellent paper on his site that details adjustments regarding 
the K3 and its "noisy audio". Without a doubt, a correctly configured 
radio will offer outstanding performance.


My 55 year ham history comes from a long line of Tentec, Kenwood, ICOM, 
and Yaesu radios.   Needless to say,  I find the K3S is superior to 
anything I've had access to use.


73

Bob, K4TAX



On 9/3/2018 8:48 AM, Bill wrote:
I have been using my K3/P3 since new in early 2013. Initially, I had a 
devil of a time getting the RX audio to sound pleasing. Understand - 
that is pleasing to me. There was always a high percentage of 
background white noise.


Eventually, after a lot of experimentation, I settled on various EQ, 
AGC, ATT, RF Gain etc. All this was to make it comfortable for 
long-term armchair copy on 40, 75, and 160 meters. I also bought a 
pair of Behringer MS40 speakers to improve things.  All told, I was 
relatively pleased with the results - - - until.. I bought an Icom 
7300.


The 7300 is quiet. Nearly zero background noise - signals just jump 
out. During the daytime it is close to that of 2-meter FM. Understand 
that my QTH has nearly zero noise.


Where am I going with this? Simple - I am looking for suggestions on 
eliminating the K3's white noise problem. Please do not email, as I am 
sure I am not the only K3 user similarly interested. Sharing would be 
great.


Thanks,

Bill W2BLC K-Line


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to rmcg...@blomand.net



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Don Wilhelm

Bill,

The AGC Threshold has a lot to do with it.  Check out the "Noisy K3" 
article on my website www.w3fpr.com.  Set it to suit the noise at your 
QTH, there is no 'one size to fit all'.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 9/3/2018 9:48 AM, Bill wrote:
I have been using my K3/P3 since new in early 2013. Initially, I had a 
devil of a time getting the RX audio to sound pleasing. Understand - 
that is pleasing to me. There was always a high percentage of background 
white noise.


Eventually, after a lot of experimentation, I settled on various EQ, 
AGC, ATT, RF Gain etc. All this was to make it comfortable for long-term 
armchair copy on 40, 75, and 160 meters. I also bought a pair of 
Behringer MS40 speakers to improve things.  All told, I was relatively 
pleased with the results - - - until.. I bought an Icom 7300.


The 7300 is quiet. Nearly zero background noise - signals just jump out. 
During the daytime it is close to that of 2-meter FM. Understand that my 
QTH has nearly zero noise.


Where am I going with this? Simple - I am looking for suggestions on 
eliminating the K3's white noise problem. Please do not email, as I am 
sure I am not the only K3 user similarly interested. Sharing would be 
great.


Thanks,

Bill W2BLC K-Line


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to donw...@embarqmail.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

[Elecraft] K3: Audio settings

2018-09-03 Thread Bill
I have been using my K3/P3 since new in early 2013. Initially, I had a 
devil of a time getting the RX audio to sound pleasing. Understand - 
that is pleasing to me. There was always a high percentage of background 
white noise.


Eventually, after a lot of experimentation, I settled on various EQ, 
AGC, ATT, RF Gain etc. All this was to make it comfortable for long-term 
armchair copy on 40, 75, and 160 meters. I also bought a pair of 
Behringer MS40 speakers to improve things.  All told, I was relatively 
pleased with the results - - - until.. I bought an Icom 7300.


The 7300 is quiet. Nearly zero background noise - signals just jump out. 
During the daytime it is close to that of 2-meter FM. Understand that my 
QTH has nearly zero noise.


Where am I going with this? Simple - I am looking for suggestions on 
eliminating the K3's white noise problem. Please do not email, as I am 
sure I am not the only K3 user similarly interested. Sharing would be great.


Thanks,

Bill W2BLC K-Line


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] Why some satellites reverse the sidebands

2018-09-03 Thread Paul Stoetzer
Though there may be technical reasons behind it, the biggest reason is
practical.

If you don't invert the sidebands, the total Doppler shift is the sum
of the shift on two bands. For a satellite in a standard LEO orbit
with an uplink at 2 meters and downlink at 70 cm, the total Doppler
shift is +/- 3.5 kHz on 2 meters and +/- 10 kHz on 70 cm. If the
sidebands were not inverted, the total Doppler shift through the pass
would be +/- 13.5 kHz. If you invert the sidebands, the total Doppler
shift is the difference between the shift on two bands, or +/-  6.5
kHz. That's far easier to deal with if you're compensating for the
Doppler shift manually.

73,

Paul, N8HM
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 9:13 AM Jim Rogers  wrote:
>
> A common LO (local Oscillator) for the receiver and the transmitter is
> the only reason I can think of.
>
> Jim
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to n...@arrl.net
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] KPA500 intermittent LCD & Keying issues

2018-09-03 Thread TL_Netvision
Hello all,

My KPA500 # 1090 (driven by K3 & followed by KAT500) basically functions as
advertised at 12-35w input level. BUT the following occurs randomly (no
matter band \ mode \ power) with a tendency to repeat more often, from day
to day :

1. At some point in the operating cycle (minutes from "ON" - can be 3 or 43)
the amp will not key when  triggered by my K3.   There is a "double click"
sound similar to a relay bounce. Usually On the next PTT  from the K3 it
will key  as before, and perhaps a few cycles later this might happen again.


2. Either starting the amp from cold or after some idle time the LCD
characters dim, become unreadable  and finally disappear. The LCD remains
lit but empty. This might or might not fix itself when powering the amp off
and on again. At the  time of writing this post it is the steady state.

3. The keying issue in "1" above isn't necessarily linked to issue "2", but
sometimes both occur at the  same time.

4. So far even with empty LCD the amp is amplifying; RF & SWR LEDs indicate
expected readings. 


Any ideas please?
TIA & 73

Isaac, 4Z1TL



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] Why some satellites reverse the sidebands

2018-09-03 Thread Jim Rogers
A common LO (local Oscillator) for the receiver and the transmitter is 
the only reason I can think of.


Jim

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KAT1 f/w revision

2018-09-03 Thread Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS
Graziano,

not so much info about that but what I found on Elecraft pages is:

KAT1 F/W Upgrade to 1.3.  
"Increases matching range for loads that caused PLO message."





-
73 - Petr, OK1RP 
"Apple & Elecraft freak" 
B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com
G+:http://goo.gl/w3u2s9
G+: http://goo.gl/gP99xq
--
Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com